Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital.
Circ J. 2018 Oct 25;82(11):2887-2895. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0390. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
Basal interventricular septum (IVS) hypertrophy (BSH) with reduced basal IVS contraction and IVS-aorta angle is frequently associated with aortic stenosis (AS). BSH shape suggests compression by the longitudinally elongated ascending aorta, causing basal IVS thickening and contractile dysfunction, further suggesting the possibility of aortic wall shortening to improve the BSH. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), as opposed to transcatheter AVR (TAVR), includes aortic wall shortening by incision and stitching on the wall and may potentially improve BSH. We hypothesized that BSH configuration and its contraction improves after SAVR in patients with AS.
In 32 patients with SAVR and 36 with TAVR for AS, regional wall thickness and systolic contraction (longitudinal strain) of 18 left ventricular (LV) segments, and IVS-aorta angle were measured on echocardiography. After SAVR, basal IVS/average LV wall thickness ratio, basal IVS strain, and IVS-aorta angle significantly improved (1.11±0.24 to 1.06±0.17; -6.2±5.7 to -9.1±5.2%; 115±22 to 123±14°, P<0.001, respectively). Contractile improvement in basal IVS was correlated with pre-SAVR BSH (basal IVS/average LV wall thickness ratio or IVS-aorta angle: r=0.47 and 0.49, P<0.01, respectively). In contrast, BSH indices did not improve after TAVR.
In patients with AS, SAVR as opposed to TAVR improves associated BSH and its functional impairment.
伴有收缩期室间隔(IVS)与主动脉夹角减小的基底 IVS 肥厚(BSH)与主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)密切相关。BSH 的形态提示升主动脉的纵向拉长导致基底 IVS 增厚和收缩功能障碍,进一步提示主动脉壁缩短以改善 BSH 的可能性。与经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)相比,外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)包括通过切开和缝合主动脉壁来缩短主动脉壁,并且可能潜在地改善 BSH。我们假设 AS 患者 SAVR 后 BSH 形态及其收缩功能改善。
在 32 例接受 SAVR 和 36 例接受 TAVR 的 AS 患者中,通过超声心动图测量 18 个左心室(LV)节段的局部壁厚度和收缩期(纵向应变)以及 IVS-主动脉夹角。SAVR 后,基底 IVS/LV 壁平均厚度比、基底 IVS 应变和 IVS-主动脉夹角显著改善(1.11±0.24 至 1.06±0.17;-6.2±5.7 至-9.1±5.2%;115±22 至 123±14°,P<0.001)。基底 IVS 的收缩改善与术前 SAVR 的 BSH 相关(基底 IVS/LV 壁平均厚度比或 IVS-主动脉夹角:r=0.47 和 0.49,P<0.01)。相比之下,BSH 指数在 TAVR 后没有改善。
在 AS 患者中,与 TAVR 相比,SAVR 改善了相关的 BSH 及其功能障碍。