• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注射用舒巴坦/氨苄西林与克林霉素/庆大霉素治疗盆腔炎的比较。

A comparison of parenteral sulbactam/ampicillin versus clindamycin/gentamicin in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.

作者信息

Gunning J

出版信息

Drugs. 1986;31 Suppl 2:14-7. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600312-00004.

DOI:10.2165/00003495-198600312-00004
PMID:3013567
Abstract

60 hospitalized patients with pelvic inflammatory disease entered a randomised study to compare the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of parenteral sulbactam/ampicillin with that of clindamycin/gentamicin. All 49 pathogens isolated at entry from 21 evaluable patients in the sulbactam/ampicillin group were eradicated. 34 out of 35 pathogens isolated from 18 evaluable patients in the clindamycin/gentamicin group were eradicated. All pathogens resistant to ampicillin in vitro were eradicated. The bacteriological, clinical and overall responses for the sulbactam/ampicillin group were 100%, 85.7% and 85.7%, respectively, compared with 97.1%, 94.4% and 94.4%, respectively, for the clindamycin/gentamicin group. The sulbactam/ampicillin combination was well tolerated.

摘要

60例盆腔炎住院患者进入一项随机研究,以比较注射用舒巴坦/氨苄西林与克林霉素/庆大霉素的治疗效果和耐受性。舒巴坦/氨苄西林组21例可评估患者入院时分离出的49种病原体全部被清除。克林霉素/庆大霉素组18例可评估患者分离出的35种病原体中有34种被清除。所有对氨苄西林体外耐药的病原体均被清除。舒巴坦/氨苄西林组的细菌学、临床和总体反应率分别为100%、85.7%和85.7%,而克林霉素/庆大霉素组分别为97.1%、94.4%和94.4%。舒巴坦/氨苄西林组合耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
A comparison of parenteral sulbactam/ampicillin versus clindamycin/gentamicin in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.注射用舒巴坦/氨苄西林与克林霉素/庆大霉素治疗盆腔炎的比较。
Drugs. 1986;31 Suppl 2:14-7. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600312-00004.
2
A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections.氨苄西林加舒巴坦与庆大霉素加克林霉素治疗腹腔内感染的随机对照试验:初步报告。腹腔内感染研究组
Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S583-8.
3
Randomized comparison of ampicillin-sulbactam to cefoxitin and doxycycline or clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease or endometritis.氨苄西林舒巴坦与头孢西丁及多西环素或克林霉素与庆大霉素治疗盆腔炎或子宫内膜炎的随机对照比较
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun;83(6):998-1004. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199406000-00020.
4
Sulbactam/ampicillin for treatment of polymicrobial pelvic infections.舒巴坦/氨苄西林用于治疗混合性盆腔感染。
Drugs. 1986;31 Suppl 2:22-5. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600312-00006.
5
Sulbactam/ampicillin versus metronidazole/gentamicin in the treatment of severe pelvic infections.舒巴坦/氨苄西林与甲硝唑/庆大霉素治疗严重盆腔感染的对比研究
Drugs. 1986;31 Suppl 2:11-3. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600312-00003.
6
A randomized, double-blind comparison of sulbactam/ampicillin and clindamycin for the treatment of aerobic and aerobic-anaerobic infections.舒巴坦/氨苄西林与克林霉素治疗需氧菌及需氧-厌氧菌感染的随机双盲对照研究
Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S569-75. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.supplement_5.s569.
7
A comparison of ampicillin plus sulbactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin for treatment of postpartum infection.氨苄西林加舒巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗产后感染的比较。
Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1989;2:35-9. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(89)90090-8.
8
The role of Pseudomonas species in patients treated with ampicillin and Sulbactam for gangrenous and perforated appendicitis.假单胞菌属在接受氨苄西林和舒巴坦治疗的坏疽性和穿孔性阑尾炎患者中的作用。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985 Oct;161(4):303-7.
9
Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗住院盆腔感染女性的疗效比较。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦研究组
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;83(2):280-6.
10
Ampicillin/sulbactam vs. clindamycin/gentamicin in the treatment of postpartum endometritis.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与克林霉素/庆大霉素治疗产后子宫内膜炎的比较
J Reprod Med. 1996 Aug;41(8):575-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 20;8(8):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub3.
2
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub2.
3
Ampicillin/Sulbactam vs. Cefoxitin for the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢西丁治疗盆腔炎性疾病的比较

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections of the female genital tract.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 Suppl D:105-14. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.105.
2
Selection of antimicrobial agents for treatment of infections of the female genital tract.用于治疗女性生殖道感染的抗菌药物的选择。
Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Mar-Apr;5 Suppl 1:S98-104. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.supplement_1.s98.
3
Failure of beta-lactam antibiotics to eradicate Chlamydia trachomatis in the endometrium despite apparent clinical cure of acute salpingitis.尽管急性输卵管炎表面上已临床治愈,但β-内酰胺类抗生素仍无法根除子宫内膜中的沙眼衣原体。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1997;5(5):319-25. doi: 10.1155/S1064744997000562.
4
Ampicillin/sulbactam: current status in severe bacterial infections.氨苄西林/舒巴坦:在严重细菌感染中的现状
Drugs. 2007;67(13):1829-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767130-00003.
5
Sulbactam/ampicillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use.
Drugs. 1987 Jun;33(6):577-609. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198733060-00003.
6
Treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease in the ambulatory setting: trial of cefoxitin and doxycycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam.门诊环境下急性盆腔炎的治疗:头孢西丁和多西环素对比氨苄西林舒巴坦的试验
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Aug;35(8):1651-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.8.1651.
JAMA. 1983 Nov 18;250(19):2641-5.
4
Microbiology and pathogenesis of acute salpingitis as determined by laparoscopy: what is the appropriate site to sample?通过腹腔镜检查确定的急性输卵管炎的微生物学及发病机制:合适的取样部位是哪里?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Dec 1;138(7 Pt 2):985-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)91093-5.
5
Clavulanic acid and CP-45,899: a comparison of their in vitro activity in combination with penicillins.克拉维酸与CP-45,899:二者与青霉素联合应用的体外活性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980 Mar;6(2):197-206. doi: 10.1093/jac/6.2.197.
6
Polymicrobial etiology of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.急性盆腔炎的多微生物病因
N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 24;293(4):166-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197507242930403.
7
CP-45,899, a beta-lactamase inhibitor that extends the antibacterial spectrum of beta-lactams: initial bacteriological characterization.CP-45899,一种可扩展β-内酰胺类抗菌谱的β-内酰胺酶抑制剂:初步细菌学特征
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Sep;14(3):414-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.14.3.414.