• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊环境下急性盆腔炎的治疗:头孢西丁和多西环素对比氨苄西林舒巴坦的试验

Treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease in the ambulatory setting: trial of cefoxitin and doxycycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam.

作者信息

Kosseim M, Ronald A, Plummer F A, D'Costa L, Brunham R C

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Aug;35(8):1651-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.8.1651.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.35.8.1651
PMID:1929337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC245235/
Abstract

Ampicillin-sulbactam (750 mg) given orally twice daily for 10 days was evaluated for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in an ambulatory setting in Nairobi, Kenya. The first 26 women received ampicillin-sulbactam in an open-label fashion, and the remaining 75 women were randomly selected to receive either ampicillin-sulbactam (n = 38) or cefoxitin (2 g) intramuscularly and probenecid (1 g) orally, followed by doxycycline (100 mg) orally twice daily for 10 days (n = 37). Women were enrolled in a sexually transmitted disease clinic and were followed for clinical and microbiologic responses at 1 to 2 weeks and 4 to 6 weeks posttreatment. Women had a later follow-up visit to note interim pregnancy or underwent hysterosalpingography for fertility outcome assessment. The short-term clinical response rates were 70% for ampicillin-sulbactam and 72% for cefoxitin-doxycycline (P = 0.47). Among Chlamydia trachomatis-infected women treated with ampicillin-sulbactam, three had microbiologic relapse. The post-PID tubal obstruction rates were similar in the two groups: 18% for ampicillin-sulbactam and 33% for cefoxitin-doxycycline (P = 0.31). Neither regimen was highly effective as a therapy for acute PID. These data strongly argue that primary prevention must be the goal for a reduction of PID morbidity and show that improved therapy for the treatment of PID in the ambulatory setting is needed.

摘要

在肯尼亚内罗毕的门诊环境中,评估了口服氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦(750毫克,每日两次,共10天)治疗急性盆腔炎(PID)的效果。前26名女性接受了开放标签的氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦治疗,其余75名女性被随机选择接受氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦(n = 38)或头孢西丁(2克)肌肉注射加丙磺舒(1克)口服,随后口服多西环素(100毫克,每日两次,共10天)(n = 37)。这些女性在性传播疾病诊所登记,并在治疗后1至2周和4至6周进行临床和微生物学反应随访。女性进行了后期随访以记录中期妊娠情况,或接受子宫输卵管造影以评估生育结局。氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦组的短期临床反应率为70%,头孢西丁 - 多西环素组为72%(P = 0.47)。在接受氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦治疗的沙眼衣原体感染女性中,有3例出现微生物学复发。两组的PID后输卵管阻塞率相似:氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦组为18%,头孢西丁 - 多西环素组为33%(P = 0.31)。两种治疗方案作为急性PID的治疗方法都不是非常有效。这些数据有力地表明,一级预防必须成为降低PID发病率的目标,并表明需要改进门诊环境中PID的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease in the ambulatory setting: trial of cefoxitin and doxycycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam.门诊环境下急性盆腔炎的治疗:头孢西丁和多西环素对比氨苄西林舒巴坦的试验
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Aug;35(8):1651-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.8.1651.
2
Randomized comparison of ampicillin-sulbactam to cefoxitin and doxycycline or clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease or endometritis.氨苄西林舒巴坦与头孢西丁及多西环素或克林霉素与庆大霉素治疗盆腔炎或子宫内膜炎的随机对照比较
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun;83(6):998-1004. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199406000-00020.
3
Sulbactam/ampicillin in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.
Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1989;2:13-9; discussion 47-8. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(89)90087-8.
4
Multicenter randomized trial of ofloxacin versus cefoxitin and doxycycline in outpatient treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Ambulatory PID Research Group.氧氟沙星与头孢西丁及多西环素用于门诊治疗盆腔炎的多中心随机试验。门诊盆腔炎研究组
South Med J. 1993 Jun;86(6):604-10. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199306000-00002.
5
Sulbactam/ampicillin versus cefoxitin for uncomplicated and complicated acute pelvic inflammatory disease.
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 7:39-42. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800357-00010.
6
Outpatient treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease with cefoxitin and doxycycline.用头孢西丁和多西环素对盆腔炎进行门诊治疗。
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Apr;71(4):595-600.
7
Single-agent therapy for acute pelvic inflammatory disease: sulbactam/ampicillin versus cefoxitin.
J Int Med Res. 1990;18 Suppl 4:85D-89D.
8
Treatment of acute salpingitis with sulbactam/ampicillin. Comparison with cefoxitin.
Drugs. 1986;31 Suppl 2:7-10. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600312-00002.
9
Ampicillin/Sulbactam vs. Cefoxitin for the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢西丁治疗盆腔炎性疾病的比较
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1997;5(5):319-25. doi: 10.1155/S1064744997000562.
10
[Acute bacterial salpingitis. The importance of residual inflammation. A comparative study with celioscopic control of 2 antibiotic protocols: sulbactam-ampicillin versus cefoxitin].
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1990;19(6):765-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 20;8(8):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub3.
2
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub2.
3
Penicillin kills Chlamydia following the fusion of bacteria with lysosomes and prevents genital inflammatory lesions in C. muridarum-infected mice.青霉素在细菌与溶酶体融合后杀死衣原体,并预防感染鼠衣原体的小鼠发生生殖器炎性病变。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e83511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083511. eCollection 2013.
4
Ampicillin/Sulbactam vs. Cefoxitin for the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢西丁治疗盆腔炎性疾病的比较
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1997;5(5):319-25. doi: 10.1155/S1064744997000562.
5
Inpatient treatment for uncomplicated and complicated acute pelvic inflammatory disease: ampicillin/sulbactam vs. Cefoxitin.单纯性和复杂性急性盆腔炎的住院治疗:氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢西丁的比较。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1993;1(3):123-9. doi: 10.1155/S1064744993000286.
6
Do short-term markers of treatment efficacy predict long-term sequelae of pelvic inflammatory disease?治疗效果的短期指标能否预测盆腔炎的长期后遗症?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):30.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.021.
7
Place of parenteral cephalosporins in the ambulatory setting: clinical evidence.胃肠外头孢菌素在门诊环境中的应用:临床证据
Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 3:37-46; discussion 47-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059003-00005.

本文引用的文献

1
Eradication of Chlamydia trachomatis from the urethras of men with nongonococcal urethritis by treatment with amoxicillin.
Sex Transm Dis. 1981 Apr-Jun;8(2):79-81. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198104000-00010.
2
Efficacy of treatment regimens for lower urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.女性下泌尿生殖道沙眼衣原体感染治疗方案的疗效
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jan 15;142(2):125-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32325-0.
3
Incidence, prevalence, and trends of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in industrialized countries.工业化国家急性盆腔炎及其后果的发病率、患病率和趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Dec 1;138(7 Pt 2):880-92. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)91077-7.
4
Prevention of acute pelvic inflammatory disease after hysterosalpingography: efficacy of doxycycline prophylaxis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Nov 15;147(6):623-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90438-6.
5
Therapy for acute pelvic inflammatory disease: a critique of recent treatment trials.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Feb 1;148(3):235-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(84)80061-7.
6
Sensitivity of immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cell culture.用单克隆抗体进行免疫荧光检测细胞培养中沙眼衣原体包涵体的敏感性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jul;16(1):4-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.4-7.1982.
7
Self-reported pelvic inflammatory disease in the US: a common occurrence.美国自我报告的盆腔炎:常见现象。
Am J Public Health. 1985 Oct;75(10):1216-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.10.1216.
8
Radionuclide evaluation of tubal function.
Fertil Steril. 1985 May;43(5):757-60. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48561-4.
9
Chlamydia trachomatis: its role in tubal infertility.沙眼衣原体:其在输卵管性不孕中的作用。
J Infect Dis. 1985 Dec;152(6):1275-82. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.6.1275.
10
Outpatient treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease with cefoxitin and doxycycline.用头孢西丁和多西环素对盆腔炎进行门诊治疗。
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Apr;71(4):595-600.