Kosseim M, Ronald A, Plummer F A, D'Costa L, Brunham R C
Department of Medical Microbiology University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Aug;35(8):1651-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.8.1651.
Ampicillin-sulbactam (750 mg) given orally twice daily for 10 days was evaluated for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in an ambulatory setting in Nairobi, Kenya. The first 26 women received ampicillin-sulbactam in an open-label fashion, and the remaining 75 women were randomly selected to receive either ampicillin-sulbactam (n = 38) or cefoxitin (2 g) intramuscularly and probenecid (1 g) orally, followed by doxycycline (100 mg) orally twice daily for 10 days (n = 37). Women were enrolled in a sexually transmitted disease clinic and were followed for clinical and microbiologic responses at 1 to 2 weeks and 4 to 6 weeks posttreatment. Women had a later follow-up visit to note interim pregnancy or underwent hysterosalpingography for fertility outcome assessment. The short-term clinical response rates were 70% for ampicillin-sulbactam and 72% for cefoxitin-doxycycline (P = 0.47). Among Chlamydia trachomatis-infected women treated with ampicillin-sulbactam, three had microbiologic relapse. The post-PID tubal obstruction rates were similar in the two groups: 18% for ampicillin-sulbactam and 33% for cefoxitin-doxycycline (P = 0.31). Neither regimen was highly effective as a therapy for acute PID. These data strongly argue that primary prevention must be the goal for a reduction of PID morbidity and show that improved therapy for the treatment of PID in the ambulatory setting is needed.
在肯尼亚内罗毕的门诊环境中,评估了口服氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦(750毫克,每日两次,共10天)治疗急性盆腔炎(PID)的效果。前26名女性接受了开放标签的氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦治疗,其余75名女性被随机选择接受氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦(n = 38)或头孢西丁(2克)肌肉注射加丙磺舒(1克)口服,随后口服多西环素(100毫克,每日两次,共10天)(n = 37)。这些女性在性传播疾病诊所登记,并在治疗后1至2周和4至6周进行临床和微生物学反应随访。女性进行了后期随访以记录中期妊娠情况,或接受子宫输卵管造影以评估生育结局。氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦组的短期临床反应率为70%,头孢西丁 - 多西环素组为72%(P = 0.47)。在接受氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦治疗的沙眼衣原体感染女性中,有3例出现微生物学复发。两组的PID后输卵管阻塞率相似:氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦组为18%,头孢西丁 - 多西环素组为33%(P = 0.31)。两种治疗方案作为急性PID的治疗方法都不是非常有效。这些数据有力地表明,一级预防必须成为降低PID发病率的目标,并表明需要改进门诊环境中PID的治疗方法。