Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):756-765. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1748-0.
To determine whether there is any additional metal artifact reduction when virtual monochromatic images (VMI) and metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR) are applied together compared to their separate application in both phantom and clinical abdominopelvic CT studies.
An agar phantom containing a spinal prosthesis was scanned using a dual-layer, energy CT scanner (IQon, Philips Healthcare), and reconstructed with the filtered back-projection algorithm without O-MAR (FBP), filtered back-projection algorithm with O-MAR (O-MAR), VMI without O-MAR (VMI), and VMI with O-MAR (VMI + O-MAR). Abdominopelvic CT images of 47 patients with metallic prostheses were also reconstructed in the same manner for clinical study. Noise measured as the standard deviation of CT Hounsfield units was compared between the four reconstruction methods in both phantom and clinical studies. Improvements in metal artifact reduction, image quality, and diagnostic improvement were further analyzed in the clinical study.
Noise was significantly decreased when both VMI and O-MAR were applied in conjunction compared to their separate application in both phantom (16.3 HU vs. 25.0 and 26.4 HU) and clinical studies (15.8 HU vs. 19.2 and 26.2 HU). In the clinical study, the qualitative degree of artifacts was also significantly reduced with VMI + O-MAR (2.85 and 2.87) compared to VMI (2.36 and 2.26) or O-MAR (2.13 and 2.04) alone for both reviewers (P < 0.001) and improvements in image quality were observed in all 47 patients, with actual diagnostic improvements observed in three.
Metal artifacts can be additionally reduced by applying O-MAR and VMI in conjunction, compared to their separate application, thereby improving diagnostic performance.
在体模和临床腹部盆腔 CT 研究中,比较虚拟单能量图像(VMI)和骨科植入物金属伪影减少(O-MAR)联合应用与单独应用时,是否存在更多的金属伪影减少。
使用双层能谱 CT 扫描仪(IQon,飞利浦医疗保健)对含有脊柱假体的琼脂体模进行扫描,并使用滤波反投影算法(无 O-MAR 的 FBP)、带有 O-MAR 的滤波反投影算法(O-MAR)、无 O-MAR 的 VMI(VMI)和带有 O-MAR 的 VMI(VMI+O-MAR)进行重建。同样以相同的方式对 47 例带有金属假体的患者进行腹部盆腔 CT 重建,进行临床研究。在体模和临床研究中,比较了四种重建方法的噪声,噪声定义为 CT 亨氏单位标准差。在临床研究中,进一步分析了金属伪影减少、图像质量和诊断改善的改善情况。
与体模(16.3 HU 比 25.0 和 26.4 HU)和临床研究(15.8 HU 比 19.2 和 26.2 HU)中单独应用 VMI 和 O-MAR 相比,同时应用 VMI 和 O-MAR 时,噪声显著降低。在临床研究中,与单独应用 VMI(2.36 和 2.26)或 O-MAR(2.13 和 2.04)相比,VMI+O-MAR(2.85 和 2.87)在两位观察者中,伪影的定性程度也显著降低(P<0.001),并且所有 47 例患者的图像质量均有改善,其中 3 例有实际诊断改善。
与单独应用相比,O-MAR 和 VMI 联合应用可进一步减少金属伪影,从而提高诊断性能。