Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2018 Nov;28(11):4524-4533. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5414-2. Epub 2018 May 3.
This study compares metal artifact (MA) reduction in imaging of total hip replacements (THR) using virtual monoenergetic images (VMI), for MA-reduction-specialized reconstructions (MAR) and conventional CT images (CI) from detector-based dual-energy computed tomography (SDCT).
Twenty-seven SDCT-datasets of patients carrying THR were included. CI, MAR and VMI with different energy-levels (60-200 keV) were reconstructed from the same scans. MA width was measured. Attenuation (HU), noise (SD) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined in: extinction artifact, adjacent bone, muscle and bladder. Two radiologists assessed MA-reduction and image quality visually.
In comparison to CI, VMI (200 keV) and MAR showed a strong artifact reduction (MA width: CI 29.9±6.8 mm, VMI 17.6±13.6 mm, p<0.001; MAR 16.5±14.9 mm, p<0.001; MA density: CI -412.1±204.5 HU, VMI -279.7±283.7 HU; p<0.01; MAR -116.74±105.6 HU, p<0.001). In strong artifacts reduction was superior by MAR. In moderate artifacts VMI was more effective. MAR showed best noise reduction and CNR in bladder and muscle (p<0.05), whereas VMI were superior for depiction of bone (p<0.05). Visual assessment confirmed that VMI and MAR improve artifact reduction and image quality (p<0.001).
MAR and VMI (200 keV) yielded significant MA reduction. Each showed distinct advantages both regarding effectiveness of artifact reduction, MAR regarding assessment of soft tissue and VMI regarding assessment of bone.
• Spectral-detector computed tomography improves assessment of total hip replacements and surrounding tissue. • Virtual monoenergetic images and MAR reduce metal artifacts and enhance image quality. • Evaluation of bone, muscle and pelvic organs can be improved by SDCT.
本研究比较了使用虚拟单能量图像(VMI)和基于探测器的双能 CT(SDCT)进行的金属伪影(MA)校正专用重建(MAR)和常规 CT 图像(CI)在成像全髋关节置换术(THR)中的 MA 减少效果。
纳入了 27 例携带 THR 的 SDCT 数据集。从同一次扫描中重建了不同能量水平(60-200keV)的 CI、MAR 和 VMI。测量 MA 宽度。在消光伪影、相邻骨、肌肉和膀胱中测定衰减(HU)、噪声(SD)和对比噪声比(CNR)。两名放射科医生对 MA 减少和图像质量进行了视觉评估。
与 CI 相比,VMI(200keV)和 MAR 显示出较强的伪影减少(MA 宽度:CI 29.9±6.8mm,VMI 17.6±13.6mm,p<0.001;MAR 16.5±14.9mm,p<0.001;MA 密度:CI-412.1±204.5HU,VMI-279.7±283.7HU;p<0.01;MAR-116.74±105.6HU,p<0.001)。在强烈的伪影减少方面,MAR 更有效。在中度伪影中,VMI 效果更好。MAR 在膀胱和肌肉中显示出最佳的噪声降低和 CNR(p<0.05),而 VMI 则在骨骼显示方面更有优势(p<0.05)。视觉评估证实,VMI 和 MAR 可改善伪影减少和图像质量(p<0.001)。
MAR 和 VMI(200keV)可显著减少 MA。在减少伪影的效果、MAR 对软组织的评估以及 VMI 对骨骼的评估方面,每种方法都有明显的优势。