Suppr超能文献

玻璃化囊胚移植后出生的儿童与新鲜及玻璃化卵裂期胚胎移植后出生的儿童出现出生缺陷的风险。

The risk of birth defects among children born after vitrified blastocyst transfers and those born after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfers.

作者信息

Zhu Qianqian, Wang Ningling, Wang Bian, Wang Yun, Kuang Yanping

机构信息

Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Zhizaoju Road No. 639, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;298(4):833-840. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4870-x. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the risk of birth defects among children born after vitrified blastocyst transfers and those born after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfers.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted including infants born after fresh and vitrified day 3 embryo transfers and those born after vitrified day 5 or 6 blastocyst transfers from January 2005 through December 2016. The outcome measures included any birth defect, multiple birth defects and 13 individual categories of birth defects.

RESULTS

Any birth defect occurred in 1.15% of infants born after fresh day 3 embryo transfers, 1.75% of infants born after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers, 1.60% of infants born after vitrified day 5 blastocyst transfers and 1.10% of infants born after vitrified day 6 blastocyst transfers. There was no difference in the risk of birth defects between vitrified blastocyst-stage transfers and vitrified cleavage-stage transfers (including day 5 vs. day 3 and day 6 vs. day 3) among all births or in only singletons or twins. For infants born after cleavage-stage embryo transfers at day 3, there was no difference in the risk of birth defects between fresh embryo transfers and vitrified embryo transfers among all births or in only singletons or twins.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfer of vitrified day 5 or 6 blastocysts does not increase the risk of birth defects compared with vitrified day 3 embryos. However, randomized control trials and follow-up studies of the long-term outcome of children born after blastocyst-stage transfers are needed to confirm the clinical safety of extending embryo culture to the blastocyst stage.

摘要

目的

探讨玻璃化囊胚移植后出生儿童以及新鲜和玻璃化卵裂期胚胎移植后出生儿童的出生缺陷风险。

方法

进行一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2005年1月至2016年12月期间新鲜和玻璃化第3天胚胎移植后出生的婴儿以及玻璃化第5天或第6天囊胚移植后出生的婴儿。观察指标包括任何出生缺陷、多重出生缺陷以及13种个体出生缺陷类别。

结果

新鲜第3天胚胎移植后出生的婴儿中,1.15%出现任何出生缺陷;玻璃化第3天胚胎移植后出生的婴儿中,1.75%出现任何出生缺陷;玻璃化第5天囊胚移植后出生的婴儿中,1.60%出现任何出生缺陷;玻璃化第6天囊胚移植后出生的婴儿中,1.10%出现任何出生缺陷。在所有出生婴儿中,以及仅在单胎或双胎中,玻璃化囊胚期移植与玻璃化卵裂期移植(包括第5天与第3天、第6天与第3天)之间出生缺陷风险无差异。对于第3天卵裂期胚胎移植后出生的婴儿,在所有出生婴儿中,以及仅在单胎或双胎中,新鲜胚胎移植与玻璃化胚胎移植之间出生缺陷风险无差异。

结论

与玻璃化第3天胚胎相比,玻璃化第5天或第6天囊胚移植不会增加出生缺陷风险。然而,需要进行随机对照试验以及对囊胚期移植后出生儿童的长期结局进行随访研究,以证实将胚胎培养延长至囊胚期的临床安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验