• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

β受体阻滞剂在急性心肌梗死后虚弱老年患者中的患者重要不良事件。

Patient-Important Adverse Events of β-blockers in Frail Older Adults after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Rhode Island.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Jul 12;74(8):1277-1281. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly191.

DOI:10.1093/gerona/gly191
PMID:30137259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6625583/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the burden of adverse events caused by β-blocker use after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in frail, older nursing home (NH) residents.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used national Medicare claims linked to Minimum Data Set assessments. The study population was individuals aged ≥65 years who resided in a U.S. NH for ≥30 days, had a hospitalized AMI between May 2007 and March 2010, and returned to the NH. Exposure was new use of β-blockers versus nonuse post-AMI. Orthostasis, general hypotension, falls, dizziness, syncope, and breathlessness outcomes were measured over 90 days of follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models after 1:1 propensity score-matching of β-blocker users to nonusers.

RESULTS

Among the 10,992 NH propensity score-matched residents with an AMI, the mean age was 84 years and 70.9% were female. β-blocker users were more likely than nonusers to be hospitalized for hypotension (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.39) or experience breathlessness (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20) after AMI. With the exception of falls, other outcome estimates, though imprecise, were compatible with a potential elevated risk of orthostasis (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.96-1.35), syncope, (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.55-2.77), and dizziness (OR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.82-1.99) among β-blocker users.

CONCLUSIONS

Considered alongside prior evidence that β-blockers may worsen functional outcomes in NH residents with poor baseline functional and cognitive status, our results suggest that providers should exercise caution when prescribing for these vulnerable groups, balancing the mortality benefit against the potential for causing adverse events.

摘要

背景

我们评估了β受体阻滞剂在衰弱的老年疗养院(NH)居民中的急性心肌梗死(AMI)后使用引起的不良事件负担。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用国家医疗保险索赔与最低数据集评估相关联。研究人群为年龄≥65 岁的个体,他们在 NH 居住≥30 天,在 2007 年 5 月至 2010 年 3 月期间患有住院 AMI,并返回 NH。暴露是 AMI 后新使用β受体阻滞剂与非使用。在 90 天的随访期间,测量了体位性低血压、一般低血压、跌倒、头晕、晕厥和呼吸困难的结果。在 1:1 倾向评分匹配β受体阻滞剂使用者和非使用者后,使用多项逻辑回归模型估计结果的比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在 10992 名 AMI 匹配的 NH 倾向评分居民中,平均年龄为 84 岁,70.9%为女性。与非使用者相比,β受体阻滞剂使用者更有可能因低血压(OR=1.20,95%CI 1.03-1.39)或呼吸困难(OR=1.10,95%CI 1.01-1.20)而住院。除了跌倒之外,其他结果估计虽然不精确,但与体位性低血压(OR=1.14,95%CI 0.96-1.35)、晕厥(OR=1.24,95%CI 0.55-2.77)和头晕(OR=1.28,95%CI 0.82-1.99)的风险升高可能相关。

结论

考虑到先前的证据表明β受体阻滞剂可能会使基线功能和认知状态较差的 NH 居民的功能结果恶化,我们的结果表明,在为这些弱势群体开处方时,医务人员应谨慎行事,权衡死亡率获益与引起不良事件的潜在风险。

相似文献

1
Patient-Important Adverse Events of β-blockers in Frail Older Adults after Acute Myocardial Infarction.β受体阻滞剂在急性心肌梗死后虚弱老年患者中的患者重要不良事件。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Jul 12;74(8):1277-1281. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly191.
2
Association of β-Blockers With Functional Outcomes, Death, and Rehospitalization in Older Nursing Home Residents After Acute Myocardial Infarction.β受体阻滞剂与老年疗养院居民急性心肌梗死后功能结局、死亡及再住院的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):254-262. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7701.
3
Beta-Blocker Use in U.S. Nursing Home Residents After Myocardial Infarction: A National Study.美国心肌梗死后疗养院居民使用β受体阻滞剂的全国性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Apr;65(4):754-762. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14671. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
4
Outcomes of "diabetes-friendly" vs "diabetes-unfriendly" β-blockers in older nursing home residents with diabetes after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后老年疗养院糖尿病患者使用“适合糖尿病”与“不适合糖尿病”β受体阻滞剂的结局比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2724-2732. doi: 10.1111/dom.13451. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
5
Secondary Prevention Medication Use After Myocardial Infarction in U.S. Nursing Home Residents.美国疗养院居民心肌梗死后的二级预防药物使用情况
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Nov;65(11):2397-2404. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15144. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
6
Effects of Statins for Secondary Prevention on Functioning and Other Outcomes Among Nursing Home Residents.他汀类药物对疗养院居民功能和其他结局的二级预防作用。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Apr;21(4):500-507.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.01.102. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Older Nursing Home Residents After Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.老年疗养院心肌梗死后患者中血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Drugs Aging. 2020 Oct;37(10):755-766. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00791-w.
8
Association Between Secondary Prevention Medication Use and Outcomes in Frail Older Adults After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后体弱老年人二级预防药物使用与预后的关联
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Apr;12(4):e004942. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004942.
9
Comparative safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas among frail older adults.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂和磺酰脲类药物在虚弱老年患者中的比较安全性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Oct;69(10):2923-2930. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17371. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
Adverse outcomes of underuse of beta-blockers in elderly survivors of acute myocardial infarction.老年急性心肌梗死幸存者β受体阻滞剂使用不足的不良后果。
JAMA. 1997 Jan 8;277(2):115-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty and prescriptions of secondary prevention medications in older people with diabetes and coronary heart disease-An observational study in Vietnam.越南老年人糖尿病和冠心病患者的衰弱状况及二级预防药物处方——一项观察性研究
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Jun;44(2):e70045. doi: 10.1111/ajag.70045.
2
Therapeutic competitions and frailty among older adults in São Paulo city: a cross-sectional population-based study, 2015.2015年圣保罗市老年人的治疗竞争与身体虚弱:一项基于人群的横断面研究
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025 Apr 11;34:e20240104. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240104.en. eCollection 2025.
3
Pharmacologic Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) in Older Adults.老年人心力射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)的药物治疗
Drugs Aging. 2025 Feb;42(2):95-110. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01165-2. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
4
Identification of potentially causative drugs associated with hypotension: A scoping review.与低血压相关的潜在致病药物的识别:一项范围综述
Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 2025 Jan;358(1):e2400564. doi: 10.1002/ardp.202400564. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
5
Cholinesterase Inhibitor Initiation Does Not Increase the Risk of Fall-Related Injury in Older Adults Treated With Beta-Blockers: A Self-Controlled Case Series Design.在接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的老年人中,起始使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂不会增加与跌倒相关损伤的风险:一项自身对照病例系列设计。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Nov 1;79(11). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae219.
6
Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Older People: Comprehensive Review and Multidisciplinary Practice-Based Recommendations.老年人急性冠状动脉综合征的管理:全面综述与基于多学科实践的建议。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 28;13(15):4416. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154416.
7
Discontinuation of beta-blockers among nursing home residents at end of life.终末期养老院居民β受体阻滞剂的停药。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jan;70(1):200-207. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17493. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Older Nursing Home Residents After Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.老年疗养院心肌梗死后患者中血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Drugs Aging. 2020 Oct;37(10):755-766. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00791-w.
9
Sex-Based Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and Complications Among Older Adults Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The SILVER-AMI Study.急性心肌梗死住院老年患者在临床表现、治疗及并发症方面的性别差异:SILVER-AMI研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Oct;12(10):e005691. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005691. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
10
How many older adults receive drugs of questionable clinical benefit near the end of life? A cohort study.有多少老年人在生命末期接受了临床疗效可疑的药物治疗?一项队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):1080-1090. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854013. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of "diabetes-friendly" vs "diabetes-unfriendly" β-blockers in older nursing home residents with diabetes after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后老年疗养院糖尿病患者使用“适合糖尿病”与“不适合糖尿病”β受体阻滞剂的结局比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2724-2732. doi: 10.1111/dom.13451. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
2
Facility and State Variation in Hip Fracture in U.S. Nursing Home Residents.美国养老院居民髋部骨折的设施和州际差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Mar;66(3):539-545. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15264. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
3
Secondary Prevention Medication Use After Myocardial Infarction in U.S. Nursing Home Residents.美国疗养院居民心肌梗死后的二级预防药物使用情况
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Nov;65(11):2397-2404. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15144. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Geriatrics Literature 2016 Year in Review.《老年医学文献2016年年评》
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Oct;65(10):2146-2150. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15064. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
5
Level of Care Preferences Among Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia.养老院中患有晚期痴呆症的居民的护理水平偏好。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Sep;54(3):340-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
Guideline-Based Prescribing in Frail Elderly Patients.老年体弱患者基于指南的处方用药
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):262-263. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7714.
7
Association of β-Blockers With Functional Outcomes, Death, and Rehospitalization in Older Nursing Home Residents After Acute Myocardial Infarction.β受体阻滞剂与老年疗养院居民急性心肌梗死后功能结局、死亡及再住院的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):254-262. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7701.
8
Beta-Blocker Use in U.S. Nursing Home Residents After Myocardial Infarction: A National Study.美国心肌梗死后疗养院居民使用β受体阻滞剂的全国性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Apr;65(4):754-762. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14671. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
9
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):e344-426. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
10
Systematic review of genuine versus spurious side-effects of beta-blockers in heart failure using placebo control: recommendations for patient information.使用安慰剂对照的心力衰竭中β受体阻滞剂的真实与虚假副作用的系统评价:患者信息的建议。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3572-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.05.068. Epub 2013 Jun 21.