• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗治疗食管或胃食管交界处癌:一项随机临床试验的长期结果。

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2019 Feb 1;32(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy078.

DOI:10.1093/dote/doy078
PMID:30137281
Abstract

NeoRes I is a randomized phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, T1N1 or T2-3N0-1 and M0-M1a (AJCC 6th ed.), were randomized to receive three 3-weekly cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours, days 1-5 with or without the addition of concurrent radiotherapy 40 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction, 5 days a week, followed by esophageal resection with two-field lymphadenectomy. Primary endpoint was complete histopathological response rate in the primary tumor. Survival and recurrence patterns were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Between 2006 and 2013, 181 patients were enrolled in Sweden and Norway. All three chemotherapy cycles were delivered to 73% of the patients allocated to chemoradiotherapy and to 86% of the patients allocated to chemotherapy. 87% of those allocated to chemoradiotherapy received full dose radiotherapy. 87% in the chemoradiotherapy group and 86% in the chemotherapy group underwent tumor resection. Initial results showed that patients allocated to chemoradiotherapy more often responded with complete histopathological response in the primary tumor (28% vs. 9%). Treatment-related complications were similar between the groups although postoperative complications were more severe in the chemoradiotherapy group. This article reports the long-term results. Five-year progression-free survival was 38.9% (95% CI 28.9%-48.8%) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 33.0% (95% CI 23.6%-42.7%) in the chemotherapy group, P = 0.82. Five-year overall survival was 42.2% (95% CI 31.9%-52.1%) versus 39.6% (95% CI 29.5%-49.4%), P = 0.60. There were no differences in recurrence patterns between the treatment groups. This is to our knowledge that the largest completed randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophageal resection in patients with cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Despite a higher tumor tissue response in those who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, no survival advantages were seen. Consequently, the results do not support unselected addition of radiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a standard of care in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.

摘要

NeoRes I 是一项随机的 II 期临床试验,比较了新辅助放化疗与新辅助化疗在可切除食管或胃食管交界处癌中的应用。入组患者为经活检证实的腺癌或鳞癌,T1N1 或 T2-3N0-1 且 M0-M1a(AJCC 第 6 版),随机接受三个 3 周周期的顺铂 100mg/m2,第 1 天,氟尿嘧啶 750mg/m2/24 小时,第 1-5 天,联合或不联合同期放疗 40Gy,2Gy/次,每周 5 天,随后进行食管切除术和两野淋巴结清扫术。主要终点为原发肿瘤完全组织病理学缓解率。生存和复发模式为次要终点。2006 年至 2013 年间,瑞典和挪威共纳入 181 例患者。新辅助放化疗组 73%的患者和新辅助化疗组 86%的患者接受了所有三个化疗周期。87%的新辅助放化疗组患者接受了全剂量放疗。新辅助放化疗组 87%和新辅助化疗组 86%的患者接受了肿瘤切除术。初步结果显示,新辅助放化疗组原发肿瘤完全组织病理学缓解的患者比例更高(28% vs. 9%)。尽管术后并发症在新辅助放化疗组更为严重,但两组间的治疗相关并发症相似。本文报道了长期结果。新辅助放化疗组 5 年无进展生存率为 38.9%(95%CI 28.9%-48.8%),新辅助化疗组为 33.0%(95%CI 23.6%-42.7%),P=0.82。新辅助放化疗组 5 年总生存率为 42.2%(95%CI 31.9%-52.1%),新辅助化疗组为 39.6%(95%CI 29.5%-49.4%),P=0.60。两组间复发模式无差异。这是我们所知的最大规模的已完成的随机试验,比较了新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗后行食管切除术治疗食管或胃食管交界处癌患者。尽管新辅助放化疗组肿瘤组织反应更高,但未观察到生存优势。因此,结果不支持将放疗作为可切除食管癌标准治疗方案的常规治疗手段。

相似文献

1
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗治疗食管或胃食管交界处癌:一项随机临床试验的长期结果。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Feb 1;32(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy078.
2
Morbidity and mortality after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation.食管癌和胃食管交界部癌手术后的发病率和死亡率:新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗的随机临床试验
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;41(7):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.226. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
3
Induction chemotherapy improved outcomes of patients with resectable esophageal cancer who received chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery.诱导化疗改善了接受放化疗后手术的可切除食管癌患者的预后。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Oct 1;60(2):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.033.
4
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术与单纯手术治疗食管或食管胃交界癌(CROSS):一项随机对照临床试验的长期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
5
Effects on heart function of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction - a prospective cohort pilot study within a randomized clinical trial.新辅助化疗和放化疗对食管癌或胃食管交界部癌患者心脏功能的影响——一项随机临床试验中的前瞻性队列先导研究
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jan 13;10:16. doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0310-7.
6
Concurrent Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Siewert II and III Adenocarcinoma at Gastroesophageal Junction.胃食管交界部Siewert II型和III型腺癌的同步新辅助放化疗
Am J Med Sci. 2015 Jun;349(6):472-6. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000476.
7
Relief of dysphagia during neoadjuvant treatment for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.食管癌或胃食管交界癌新辅助治疗期间吞咽困难的缓解
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Jul;29(5):442-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12352. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
8
Nodal metastasis from locally advanced esophageal cancer: how neoadjuvant therapy modifies their frequency and distribution.局部晚期食管癌的淋巴结转移:新辅助治疗如何改变其频率和分布。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(13):3743-54. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1753-9. Epub 2011 May 10.
9
Outcomes and survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the esophagus: Inverse propensity score weighted analysis.新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗治疗食管癌的疗效和生存:逆倾向评分加权分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;46(12):2248-2256. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.038. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
10
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Perioperative Chemotherapy for Patients With Resectable Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.可切除食管或胃食管交界腺癌患者的术前放化疗与围手术期化疗。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(8):2282-2290. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5827-1. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a clinical retrospective study.可切除食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助免疫化疗与新辅助放化疗及新辅助化疗的比较:一项临床回顾性研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 5;25(1):1270. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14682-z.
2
The prognostic power of major pathological response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: a multi-center cohort study.新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗的食管鳞状细胞癌患者主要病理反应的预后价值:一项多中心队列研究
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 7;16:1599526. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1599526. eCollection 2025.
3
Does pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy associate with long-term survival in esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
新辅助放化疗后病理完全缓解与食管癌长期生存相关吗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03016-2.
4
Recurrence patterns and long-term survival of locally advanced esophageal cancer patients with pathological complete response after different neoadjuvant therapies followed by surgery.不同新辅助治疗后行手术治疗且达到病理完全缓解的局部晚期食管癌患者的复发模式及长期生存情况
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1135. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14548-4.
5
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: efficacy and safety outcomes.食管鳞状细胞癌患者新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗与放化疗的比较:疗效和安全性结果
J Thorac Dis. 2025 May 30;17(5):2937-2946. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2107. Epub 2025 May 23.
6
Prospects of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy or chemoradiation in esophago-gastric cancers.免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗或放化疗用于食管癌和胃癌的前景
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):1790-1794. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2157. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
7
Impact of Interval to Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Analysis.新辅助免疫化疗后行食管癌切除术的时间间隔对局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的影响:一项多中心回顾性队列分析
Thorac Cancer. 2025 Mar;16(5):e70019. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.70019.
8
Debating the Optimal Preoperative Approach: NACRT vs NACT in Locally Advanced Oesophageal Cancer.探讨局部进展期食管癌的最佳术前治疗方法:新辅助同步放化疗与新辅助化疗的比较
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;15(Suppl 4):573-580. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02073-y. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
9
Adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study.食管鳞状细胞癌患者新辅助放化疗及手术后的辅助治疗:一项真实世界研究
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Feb 14;17:17588359251316179. doi: 10.1177/17588359251316179. eCollection 2025.
10
Identification of biomarkers for tumor regression grade in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后食管鳞状细胞癌患者肿瘤消退分级生物标志物的鉴定
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 17;14:1426592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1426592. eCollection 2024.