Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Feb 1;32(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy078.
NeoRes I is a randomized phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, T1N1 or T2-3N0-1 and M0-M1a (AJCC 6th ed.), were randomized to receive three 3-weekly cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours, days 1-5 with or without the addition of concurrent radiotherapy 40 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction, 5 days a week, followed by esophageal resection with two-field lymphadenectomy. Primary endpoint was complete histopathological response rate in the primary tumor. Survival and recurrence patterns were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Between 2006 and 2013, 181 patients were enrolled in Sweden and Norway. All three chemotherapy cycles were delivered to 73% of the patients allocated to chemoradiotherapy and to 86% of the patients allocated to chemotherapy. 87% of those allocated to chemoradiotherapy received full dose radiotherapy. 87% in the chemoradiotherapy group and 86% in the chemotherapy group underwent tumor resection. Initial results showed that patients allocated to chemoradiotherapy more often responded with complete histopathological response in the primary tumor (28% vs. 9%). Treatment-related complications were similar between the groups although postoperative complications were more severe in the chemoradiotherapy group. This article reports the long-term results. Five-year progression-free survival was 38.9% (95% CI 28.9%-48.8%) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 33.0% (95% CI 23.6%-42.7%) in the chemotherapy group, P = 0.82. Five-year overall survival was 42.2% (95% CI 31.9%-52.1%) versus 39.6% (95% CI 29.5%-49.4%), P = 0.60. There were no differences in recurrence patterns between the treatment groups. This is to our knowledge that the largest completed randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophageal resection in patients with cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Despite a higher tumor tissue response in those who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, no survival advantages were seen. Consequently, the results do not support unselected addition of radiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a standard of care in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
NeoRes I 是一项随机的 II 期临床试验,比较了新辅助放化疗与新辅助化疗在可切除食管或胃食管交界处癌中的应用。入组患者为经活检证实的腺癌或鳞癌,T1N1 或 T2-3N0-1 且 M0-M1a(AJCC 第 6 版),随机接受三个 3 周周期的顺铂 100mg/m2,第 1 天,氟尿嘧啶 750mg/m2/24 小时,第 1-5 天,联合或不联合同期放疗 40Gy,2Gy/次,每周 5 天,随后进行食管切除术和两野淋巴结清扫术。主要终点为原发肿瘤完全组织病理学缓解率。生存和复发模式为次要终点。2006 年至 2013 年间,瑞典和挪威共纳入 181 例患者。新辅助放化疗组 73%的患者和新辅助化疗组 86%的患者接受了所有三个化疗周期。87%的新辅助放化疗组患者接受了全剂量放疗。新辅助放化疗组 87%和新辅助化疗组 86%的患者接受了肿瘤切除术。初步结果显示,新辅助放化疗组原发肿瘤完全组织病理学缓解的患者比例更高(28% vs. 9%)。尽管术后并发症在新辅助放化疗组更为严重,但两组间的治疗相关并发症相似。本文报道了长期结果。新辅助放化疗组 5 年无进展生存率为 38.9%(95%CI 28.9%-48.8%),新辅助化疗组为 33.0%(95%CI 23.6%-42.7%),P=0.82。新辅助放化疗组 5 年总生存率为 42.2%(95%CI 31.9%-52.1%),新辅助化疗组为 39.6%(95%CI 29.5%-49.4%),P=0.60。两组间复发模式无差异。这是我们所知的最大规模的已完成的随机试验,比较了新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗后行食管切除术治疗食管或胃食管交界处癌患者。尽管新辅助放化疗组肿瘤组织反应更高,但未观察到生存优势。因此,结果不支持将放疗作为可切除食管癌标准治疗方案的常规治疗手段。