• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助放化疗后食管鳞状细胞癌患者肿瘤消退分级生物标志物的鉴定

Identification of biomarkers for tumor regression grade in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

作者信息

Chen Zhifu, Wang Yan, Chen Jun, Xu Zijun, Zhang Tingjuan, Sun Lu, Zhu Lihua, Xu Liben, Wu Chaoyang, Qiu Zhiyuan, Wang Dianjun, Wu Ting

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.

Central Laboratory, The People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 17;14:1426592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1426592. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1426592
PMID:39896184
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11782036/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is a highly invasive malignancy. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy not only increases the rate of complete resection but also improves the median survival. However, a sensitive biomarker is urgently needed in clinical practice.

METHODS

60 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) were enrolled at the People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University. Patients were grouped according to tumor regression grade (TRG) criteria from the College of American Pathologists (CAP). The correlation between TRG groups, clinicopathologic characteristics, and prognosis was analyzed. Differential gene expression analysis was performed on ESCC patients before and after NCRT using the public database (GSE43519). MMP9, NFIX, and GPR56 were identified as candidate genes, and their expression and correlation with prognosis were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis.

RESULTS

Among 60 ESCC patients who underwent surgery after NCRT, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 35.0% (21/60), and the major pathological response (MPR) rate was 60.0% (36/60). Poor tumor differentiation and neural or vascular invasion were associated with inadequate tumor regression grade and were independent factors influencing TRG. ESCC patients were divided into effective (TRG 0 + 1) and ineffective (TRG 2 + 3) groups. Higher TRG was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS). Our study also identified TRG as an independent prognostic factor through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses ( < 0.05). The differentially expressed genes GPR56, MMP9, and NFIX selected from the GSE43519 dataset were significantly downregulated after NCRT ( < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that GPR56 was highly expressed in ESCC, while it was negatively expressed in paracancerous tissues. There was a significant difference in expression between cancerous and paracancerous tissues. GPR56 expression was consistent with the public dataset, and patients with high GPR56 expression had significantly shorter OS ( < 0.05). In addition, patients with inadequate MPR and high GPR56 expression had shorter OS ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that TRG serves as an independent prognostic factor for ESCC following NCRT. High GPR56 expression is found to be associated with a poor prognosis of ESCC. Downregulation of GPR56 suggests a potential significant predictive value in conjunction with MPR analysis.

摘要

背景

食管癌是一种具有高度侵袭性的恶性肿瘤。新辅助放化疗不仅能提高完全切除率,还能改善中位生存期。然而,临床实践中迫切需要一种敏感的生物标志物。

方法

选取江苏大学附属人民医院60例接受新辅助放化疗(NCRT)的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者。根据美国病理学家学会(CAP)的肿瘤退缩分级(TRG)标准对患者进行分组。分析TRG组、临床病理特征与预后之间的相关性。利用公共数据库(GSE43519)对ESCC患者NCRT前后进行差异基因表达分析。将基质金属蛋白酶9(MMP9)、核因子I/X(NFIX)和G蛋白偶联受体56(GPR56)鉴定为候选基因,并通过免疫组化分析评估它们的表达及其与预后的相关性。

结果

60例接受NCRT后手术的ESCC患者中,病理完全缓解(pCR)率为35.0%(21/60),主要病理缓解(MPR)率为60.0%(36/60)。肿瘤低分化以及神经或血管侵犯与肿瘤退缩分级不足相关,是影响TRG的独立因素。ESCC患者分为有效组(TRG 0 + 1)和无效组(TRG 2 + 3)。TRG越高,总生存期(OS)越短。我们的研究还通过单因素和多因素Cox回归分析确定TRG为独立预后因素(P < 0.05)。从GSE43519数据集中筛选出的差异表达基因GPR56、MMP9和NFIX在NCRT后显著下调(P < 0.001)。免疫组化显示,GPR56在ESCC中高表达,而在癌旁组织中呈阴性表达。癌组织与癌旁组织的表达有显著差异。GPR56表达与公共数据集一致,GPR56高表达患者的OS明显较短(P < 0.05)。此外,MPR不足且GPR56高表达的患者OS较短(P < 0.05)。

结论

研究结果表明,TRG是NCRT后ESCC的独立预后因素。发现GPR56高表达与ESCC预后不良相关。GPR56的下调结合MPR分析提示具有潜在的显著预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/eeaa330937f9/fonc-14-1426592-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/ab42cbf9ea12/fonc-14-1426592-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/adb21da01b80/fonc-14-1426592-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/754415ef6505/fonc-14-1426592-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/b4a2eb61a396/fonc-14-1426592-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/04a3f8c2e779/fonc-14-1426592-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/0a53fce7cc02/fonc-14-1426592-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/0868bcccc648/fonc-14-1426592-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/a11eecf15eb6/fonc-14-1426592-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/eeaa330937f9/fonc-14-1426592-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/ab42cbf9ea12/fonc-14-1426592-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/adb21da01b80/fonc-14-1426592-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/754415ef6505/fonc-14-1426592-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/b4a2eb61a396/fonc-14-1426592-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/04a3f8c2e779/fonc-14-1426592-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/0a53fce7cc02/fonc-14-1426592-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/0868bcccc648/fonc-14-1426592-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/a11eecf15eb6/fonc-14-1426592-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/11782036/eeaa330937f9/fonc-14-1426592-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of biomarkers for tumor regression grade in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后食管鳞状细胞癌患者肿瘤消退分级生物标志物的鉴定
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 17;14:1426592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1426592. eCollection 2024.
2
Tumor regression grade combined with lymph node status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后食管鳞癌的肿瘤退缩分级与淋巴结状态。
Cancer Med. 2022 Oct;11(19):3623-3632. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4748. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
3
Moderately differentiated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.中分化食管鳞状细胞癌在新辅助放化疗后的预后较差。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(8):706. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1815.
4
Pathologic responses and surgical outcomes after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.新辅助免疫化疗与新辅助放化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌患者的病理反应和手术结果。
Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 17;13:1052542. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1052542. eCollection 2022.
5
Correlation Between Tumor Regression Grade and Clinicopathological Parameters in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.接受新辅助放化疗的食管鳞状细胞癌患者肿瘤退缩分级与临床病理参数的相关性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(34):e1407. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001407.
6
Prognostic significance of tumor regression grade in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.新辅助放化疗后食管鳞状细胞癌中肿瘤消退分级的预后意义
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1029575. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1029575. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparison of pathologic response and survival outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.新辅助放化疗与新辅助免疫化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌患者的病理反应和生存结局比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 5;24(1):1228. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12946-8.
8
Clinical predictors of pathologically response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long term outcomes of a phase II study.食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助放化疗后病理反应的临床预测因素:一项II期研究的长期结果
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(9):5254-5259. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.88.
9
Predictive Value of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio for Tumor Regression Grade and Prognosis of Local Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值对接受新辅助放化疗的局部晚期直肠癌患者肿瘤退缩分级和预后的预测价值。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231202611. doi: 10.1177/15330338231202611.
10
A Comparison of Clinicopathologic Outcomes and Patterns of Lymphatic Spread Across Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, and Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.新辅助化疗、新辅助放化疗和新辅助免疫化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌的临床病理结局和淋巴转移模式比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;31(2):860-871. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14534-9. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Immunotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Enhanced CT Radiomics Combined with Clinical Features.通过增强CT影像组学联合临床特征预测新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗对食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251370437. doi: 10.1177/15330338251370437. Epub 2025 Aug 17.
2
A nine-gene signature with potential targets for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer.一种具有潜在靶点的九基因特征,用于预测食管癌患者的预后。
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 30;14(7):4305-4320. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2025-146. Epub 2025 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022.2022年中国癌症发病率与死亡率
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024 Feb 2;4(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery with thoracotomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: ROMIO randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜或开腹联合经胸手术治疗食管癌的随机临床试验(ROMIO)
Br J Surg. 2024 Mar 2;111(3). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae023.
3
Analysis of the risk factors of radiation pneumonitis in patients after radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
食管鳞状细胞癌放疗后患者放射性肺炎的危险因素分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 7;13:1198872. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1198872. eCollection 2023.
4
Profiles and Findings of Population-Based Esophageal Cancer Screening With Endoscopy in China: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于人群的中国内镜食管癌筛查的特征和结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jun 1;9:e45360. doi: 10.2196/45360.
5
Tumor Regression Grade and Overall Survival following Gastrectomy with Preoperative Therapy for Gastric Cancer.胃癌术前治疗行胃切除术后肿瘤退缩分级与总生存
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;30(6):3580-3589. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13151-w. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
6
Intrathoracic Robotic-Sewn Anastomosis During Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: Back to Basics?胸腔镜机器人辅助 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术中的吻合:回归基础?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 May;27(5):1034-1041. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05616-w. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
7
Prognostic significance of tumor regression grade in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.新辅助放化疗后食管鳞状细胞癌中肿瘤消退分级的预后意义
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1029575. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1029575. eCollection 2022.
8
Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.机器人辅助经胸食管切除术机器人吻合术(Ivor Lewis):手术技术和早期结果。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):941-952. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01439-7. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
9
Predictive Survival Power of Combined Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) and Lymph Node Status in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.联合肿瘤消退分级(TRG)和淋巴结状态对食管癌患者的生存预测能力
J Invest Surg. 2023 Dec;36(1):1-2. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2142869.
10
Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants.中国和美国 2022 年癌症统计数据:概况、趋势和决定因素。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Feb 9;135(5):584-590. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108.