• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会流动信仰减轻了因社会地位不利而产生的敌意。

Belief in Social Mobility Mitigates Hostility Resulting From Disadvantaged Social Standing.

机构信息

1 University of Innsbruck, Austria.

2 Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Apr;45(4):541-556. doi: 10.1177/0146167218789073. Epub 2018 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1177/0146167218789073
PMID:30141360
Abstract

Comparing economically unfavorably with similar others has detrimental consequences for an individual, ultimately resulting in low physical health, delinquency, and hostility. In four studies ( N = 2,032), we examined whether believing in a mobile society-one offering fair chances and opportunity-mitigates hostile emotions resulting from disadvantaged social standing. We find that with increasing mobility belief, negative comparisons have gradually less impact on hostility. Specifically, measured (Studies 1 and 4) and manipulated (Studies 2 and 3) social mobility belief moderated the link between induced high versus low social status, experiencing relative deprivation, and hostile affect. A positive outcome on the surface, social mobility belief may indirectly contribute to the maintenance of social inequality by appeasing anger about perceived injustice.

摘要

与相似的人相比处于经济劣势对个人有不利影响,最终导致身体健康状况不佳、犯罪和敌意。在四项研究中(N=2032),我们研究了相信一个提供公平机会和机遇的流动社会是否可以减轻因社会地位低下而产生的敌对情绪。我们发现,随着流动信仰的增加,负面比较对敌意的影响逐渐减弱。具体来说,测量(研究 1 和 4)和操纵(研究 2 和 3)的社会流动信仰调节了诱导的高社会地位与低社会地位、相对剥夺感和敌对情绪之间的联系。表面上的积极结果,社会流动信仰可能通过平息对不公平的感知不满来间接地促进社会不平等的维持。

相似文献

1
Belief in Social Mobility Mitigates Hostility Resulting From Disadvantaged Social Standing.社会流动信仰减轻了因社会地位不利而产生的敌意。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Apr;45(4):541-556. doi: 10.1177/0146167218789073. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
2
Perceiving intraorganizational mobility ameliorates the effects of low-level position on detrimental workplace attitudes and behaviors.感知组织内流动可以减轻低层次职位对不良工作场所态度和行为的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Apr;234:103848. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103848. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3
The experience of deprivation: Does relative more than absolute status predict hostility?剥夺体验:相对地位而非绝对地位更能预测敌意吗?
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;58(3):515-533. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12288. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
Increasing wealth inequality may increase interpersonal hostility: The relationship between personal relative deprivation and aggression.日益加剧的财富不平等可能会增加人际间的敌意:个人相对剥夺感与攻击性之间的关系。
J Soc Psychol. 2017;157(6):766-776. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1288078. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
5
Beliefs about social mobility in young American children.美国年轻儿童的社会流动观念。
Dev Sci. 2024 Sep;27(5):e13527. doi: 10.1111/desc.13527. Epub 2024 May 22.
6
The double-edged effect of social mobility belief on socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescents' health: The mediating role of intentional self-regulation.社会流动信念对社会经济地位不利的青少年健康的双刃剑效应:意图自我调节的中介作用。
Health Psychol. 2024 Aug;43(8):570-578. doi: 10.1037/hea0001375. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
7
How economic inequality shapes mobility expectations and behaviour in disadvantaged youth.经济不平等如何塑造弱势青年的流动期望和行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Mar;3(3):214-220. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0523-0. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Hostility and facial expression in young men and women: is social regulation more important than negative affect?青年男性和女性的敌意与面部表情:社会调节是否比负面影响更重要?
Health Psychol. 2002 Jan;21(1):33-9.
9
Bracing for the worst, but behaving the best: social anxiety, hostility, and behavioral aggression.做好最坏的打算,但表现得最好:社交焦虑、敌意和行为攻击。
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Mar;24(2):260-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
10
Cardiovascular response to interpersonal provocation and mental arithmetic among high and low hostile young adult males.高低敌意水平的年轻成年男性在人际挑衅和心算时的心血管反应
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2009 Mar;34(1):27-35. doi: 10.1007/s10484-009-9076-3. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression.社会流动信念调节了社会经济地位、对贫富的归因与攻击性之间的联系。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 23;13(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03138-5.
2
The influence of social mobility perception and expectation on residents' health: the role of subjective well-being and physical exercise.社会流动感知与期望对居民健康的影响:主观幸福感与体育锻炼的作用。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 2;13:1562862. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1562862. eCollection 2025.
3
Do achievers tend to share goodness with the world? The effect of subjective social status on prosocial risky behavior.
成功者是否倾向于与世界分享善意?主观社会地位对亲社会冒险行为的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 26;13(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02485-7.
4
Lower class competence stereotypes of the upper class increase class conflict: mediation by intergroup envy and moderation by upward social mobility belief.下层阶级对上层阶级能力的刻板印象会加剧阶级冲突:群体间嫉妒起中介作用,向上社会流动信念起调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 30;15:1360951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360951. eCollection 2024.
5
Perceived Social Mobility and Smartphone Dependence in University Students: The Roles of Hope and Family Socioeconomic Status.大学生的感知社会流动性与智能手机依赖:希望和家庭社会经济地位的作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 May 1;17:1805-1817. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S455939. eCollection 2024.
6
High Social Mobility Leads to Delayed Reproduction.高社会流动性导致生育延迟。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 May;52(4):1365-1377. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02551-4. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
7
Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations.优势与后果:群体间关系中精英主义的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 19;10:2007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007. eCollection 2019.
8
The impact of personal relative deprivation on aggression over time.个人相对剥夺感对攻击行为的长期影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(6):664-675. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1549013. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
9
The experience of deprivation: Does relative more than absolute status predict hostility?剥夺体验:相对地位而非绝对地位更能预测敌意吗?
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;58(3):515-533. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12288. Epub 2018 Oct 30.