Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Grison, Chur, Switzerland.
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Nov;13(11):1784-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
There is no approved second-line treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). On the basis of promising early results, pembrolizumab was used off-label in Switzerland and Australia. We investigated outcomes in association with clinicopathological features and expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1).
Registry data in Australia and Switzerland were pooled. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, histological subtype, and previous treatments were captured. Outcomes were assessed locally. PD-L1 expression was categorized as negative (<5%), intermediate (5%-49%), and high (≥50%).
A total of 93 patients (48 from Switzerland and 45 from Australia) were treated; 68 patients (73%) had epithelioid MPM, and 67 (72%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Pembrolizumab was the second-line treatment in 48 of 93 patients (52%). PD-L1 expression results were available for 66 patients (71%). Most (68%) were negative, 18% were intermediate, and 14% were high for PD-L1 expression. In the full cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) was 18%, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.1 months, and the median overall survival was 7.2 months. In patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and only one previous systemic treatment (n = 35), the ORR was 37%, the mPFS was 3.7 months, and the median overall survival was 10.2 months. The nonepitheloid histological subtype showed an improved ORR (24% versus 16% [p = 0.54) and mPFS (5.6 versus 2.8 months [p = 0.02]). Compared with intermediate and negative PD-L1 expression, high PD-L1 expression was associated with an improved ORR (44% versus 42% versus 11% [p = 0.01]) and mPFS (6.2 versus 3.9 versus 2.7 months [p = 0.04]). Toxicity was as expected.
These real-world data demonstrate similar response rates but inferior survival compared with those in early-phase trials. High PD-L1 expression and nonepitheloid histological subtype were associated with greater activity. Anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy is a reasonable second-line therapy in patients with MPM.
恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)目前尚无获批的二线治疗方法。基于早期有希望的结果,派姆单抗在瑞士和澳大利亚被超适应证使用。我们研究了与临床病理特征和程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达相关的结果。
对澳大利亚和瑞士的登记数据进行了汇总。记录了患者的特征,包括年龄、性别、组织学亚型和既往治疗情况。局部评估了结果。PD-L1 表达被分为阴性(<5%)、中间(5%-49%)和高(≥50%)。
共纳入 93 例患者(瑞士 48 例,澳大利亚 45 例);68 例(73%)患者为上皮样 MPM,67 例(72%)患者的东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为 0 或 1。93 例患者中有 48 例(52%)接受了派姆单抗二线治疗。66 例(71%)患者的 PD-L1 表达结果可用。大多数(68%)为阴性,18%为中间表达,14%为高表达。在全队列中,总缓解率(ORR)为 18%,中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为 3.1 个月,中位总生存期为 7.2 个月。在东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为 0 或 1 且仅接受过一次系统治疗的患者(n=35)中,ORR 为 37%,mPFS 为 3.7 个月,中位总生存期为 10.2 个月。非上皮样组织学亚型的 ORR(24%比 16%[p=0.54])和 mPFS(5.6 比 2.8 个月[p=0.02])均有所改善。与中间和阴性 PD-L1 表达相比,高 PD-L1 表达与更高的 ORR(44%比 42%比 11%[p=0.01])和 mPFS(6.2 比 3.9 比 2.7 个月[p=0.04])相关。毒性与预期相符。
这些真实世界的数据显示,与早期试验相比,反应率相似,但生存率较低。高 PD-L1 表达和非上皮样组织学亚型与更高的活性相关。抗 PD-L1 免疫治疗是 MPM 患者合理的二线治疗方法。