Suppr超能文献

瑞士不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者中纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与铂类加培美曲塞(含或不含贝伐珠单抗)的成本效果和预算影响。

Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland.

机构信息

Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), Health Economics Facility, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Dec;41(12):1641-1655. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3. Epub 2023 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPMs) are aggressive and often unresectable. In the past, chemotherapy was the standard for palliative treatment. However, immunotherapy with nivolumab+ipilimumab has recently received marketing approval.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of nivolumab+ipilimumab versus pemetrexed+platinum (with/without bevacizumab) for Swiss patients with unresectable MPM, overall and by histological subtype.

METHODS

We developed a three-state Markov cohort model with a cycle length of 1 month, a 30-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 3% per year for costs and benefits. The model included the updated survival and treatment-dependent utility results from the Checkmate-743 and MAPS registration trials. A Swiss statutory health insurance perspective was considered with unit costs for 2022 from publicly available and real-world sources. We assumed a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CHF100,000/QALY. Model robustness was explored in sensitivity and scenario analyses.

RESULTS

Compared with chemotherapy, nivolumab+ipilimumab incurred additional costs of CHF109,115 and 0.57 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CHF192,585/QALY (i.e. USD201,829/QALY) gained. Relative to their 2022 list price, nivolumab+ipilimumab may be cost effective if priced at 48% across all histologies. Assuming cisplatin-based instead of carboplatin-based chemotherapy reduced the ICER to CHF158,911/QALY (i.e. USD166,539/QALY). For the non-epithelioid subtype, nivolumab+ipilimumab was cost effective compared with chemotherapy (ICER of CHF97,894/QALY, i.e. USD102,593/QALY). Chemotherapy+bevacizumab was often a dominated strategy or would require a bevacizumab cost reduction to 28%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model projected nivolumab+ipilimumab to be cost effective for the non-epithelioid subtype but not for all histologies. Substantial discounts for nivolumab+ipilimumab would be necessary to achieve cost effectiveness for all histologies.

摘要

背景

恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)是侵袭性的,且通常无法切除。过去,化疗是姑息治疗的标准方法。然而,纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗的免疫疗法最近已获得市场批准。

目的

本研究评估了纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗对比培美曲塞+铂类(联合/不联合贝伐珠单抗)在瑞士不可切除 MPM 患者中的成本效果,总体和按组织学亚型进行评估。

方法

我们开发了一个三状态马尔可夫队列模型,周期长度为 1 个月,时间范围为 30 年,成本和收益的贴现率为每年 3%。该模型纳入了 Checkmate-743 和 MAPS 注册试验中更新的生存和治疗依赖性效用结果。从公开来源和真实世界来源获取了 2022 年的单位成本,考虑了瑞士法定健康保险的观点。我们假设愿意支付(WTP)阈值为 10 万瑞士法郎/QALY。通过敏感性和情景分析探索了模型的稳健性。

结果

与化疗相比,纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗增加了 109,115 瑞士法郎的额外成本和 0.57 个额外的质量调整生命年(QALY),增量成本效果比(ICER)为 192,585 瑞士法郎/QALY(即 201,829 美元/QALY)。纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗如果在所有组织学类型中定价为 48%,则可能具有成本效益。假设基于顺铂而不是卡铂的化疗将 ICER 降低至 158,911 瑞士法郎/QALY(即 166,539 美元/QALY)。对于非上皮样亚型,纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗与化疗相比具有成本效果(ICER 为 97,894 瑞士法郎/QALY,即 102,593 美元/QALY)。化疗+贝伐珠单抗通常是一种主导策略,或者需要将贝伐珠单抗的成本降低 28%。

结论

我们的模型预测纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗对非上皮样亚型具有成本效果,但对所有组织学类型没有成本效果。需要对纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗进行大幅降价,才能使所有组织学类型都具有成本效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c18/10635986/b49cfdf814fa/40273_2023_1305_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验