Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), Health Economics Facility, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Dec;41(12):1641-1655. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
Malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPMs) are aggressive and often unresectable. In the past, chemotherapy was the standard for palliative treatment. However, immunotherapy with nivolumab+ipilimumab has recently received marketing approval.
This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of nivolumab+ipilimumab versus pemetrexed+platinum (with/without bevacizumab) for Swiss patients with unresectable MPM, overall and by histological subtype.
We developed a three-state Markov cohort model with a cycle length of 1 month, a 30-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 3% per year for costs and benefits. The model included the updated survival and treatment-dependent utility results from the Checkmate-743 and MAPS registration trials. A Swiss statutory health insurance perspective was considered with unit costs for 2022 from publicly available and real-world sources. We assumed a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CHF100,000/QALY. Model robustness was explored in sensitivity and scenario analyses.
Compared with chemotherapy, nivolumab+ipilimumab incurred additional costs of CHF109,115 and 0.57 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CHF192,585/QALY (i.e. USD201,829/QALY) gained. Relative to their 2022 list price, nivolumab+ipilimumab may be cost effective if priced at 48% across all histologies. Assuming cisplatin-based instead of carboplatin-based chemotherapy reduced the ICER to CHF158,911/QALY (i.e. USD166,539/QALY). For the non-epithelioid subtype, nivolumab+ipilimumab was cost effective compared with chemotherapy (ICER of CHF97,894/QALY, i.e. USD102,593/QALY). Chemotherapy+bevacizumab was often a dominated strategy or would require a bevacizumab cost reduction to 28%.
Our model projected nivolumab+ipilimumab to be cost effective for the non-epithelioid subtype but not for all histologies. Substantial discounts for nivolumab+ipilimumab would be necessary to achieve cost effectiveness for all histologies.
恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)是侵袭性的,且通常无法切除。过去,化疗是姑息治疗的标准方法。然而,纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗的免疫疗法最近已获得市场批准。
本研究评估了纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗对比培美曲塞+铂类(联合/不联合贝伐珠单抗)在瑞士不可切除 MPM 患者中的成本效果,总体和按组织学亚型进行评估。
我们开发了一个三状态马尔可夫队列模型,周期长度为 1 个月,时间范围为 30 年,成本和收益的贴现率为每年 3%。该模型纳入了 Checkmate-743 和 MAPS 注册试验中更新的生存和治疗依赖性效用结果。从公开来源和真实世界来源获取了 2022 年的单位成本,考虑了瑞士法定健康保险的观点。我们假设愿意支付(WTP)阈值为 10 万瑞士法郎/QALY。通过敏感性和情景分析探索了模型的稳健性。
与化疗相比,纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗增加了 109,115 瑞士法郎的额外成本和 0.57 个额外的质量调整生命年(QALY),增量成本效果比(ICER)为 192,585 瑞士法郎/QALY(即 201,829 美元/QALY)。纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗如果在所有组织学类型中定价为 48%,则可能具有成本效益。假设基于顺铂而不是卡铂的化疗将 ICER 降低至 158,911 瑞士法郎/QALY(即 166,539 美元/QALY)。对于非上皮样亚型,纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗与化疗相比具有成本效果(ICER 为 97,894 瑞士法郎/QALY,即 102,593 美元/QALY)。化疗+贝伐珠单抗通常是一种主导策略,或者需要将贝伐珠单抗的成本降低 28%。
我们的模型预测纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗对非上皮样亚型具有成本效果,但对所有组织学类型没有成本效果。需要对纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗进行大幅降价,才能使所有组织学类型都具有成本效果。