• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人峡部裂性脊柱滑脱后路融合术后的长期疗效。

Long-term outcome after spinal fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Orthopaedics, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):501-508. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.008
PMID:30142456
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Data on the long-term outcome after fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis are scarce.

PURPOSE

To study patient-reported outcomes and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis and to compare patient-reported outcomes with a control group.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A prospective study including a cross-sectional control group.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (n=86) or posterolateral fusion (PLF) (n=77). Patient-reported outcome data were available for 73 patients in the PLIF group and 71 in the PLF group at a mean of 11 (range 5-16) years after baseline. Seventy-seven patients in the PLIF group and 54 in the PLF group had radiographs at a mean of 14 (range 9-19) years after baseline. One hundred thirty-six randomly selected persons from the population served as controls for the patient-reported outcomes.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient-reported outcomes include the following: global outcome, Oswestry Disability Index, Disability Rating Index, and Short Form 36. The ASD was determined from radiographs using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) grading scale.

METHODS

The chi-square test or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for group comparisons. The ANCOVA was adjusted for follow-up time, smoking, Meyerding slippage grade, teetotaler (yes/no) and, if available, the baseline level of the dependent variable.

RESULTS

There were no significant patient-reported outcome differences between the PLIF group and the PLF group. The prevalence of ASD was 42% (32/77) in the PLIF group and 26% (14/54) in the PLF group (p=.98). The patient-reported outcome data indicated lower physical function and more pain in individuals with surgically treated isthmic spondylolisthesis compared to the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

PLIF and PLF groups had similar long-term patient-reported and radiological outcomes. Individuals with isthmic spondylolisthesis have lower physical function and more pain several years after surgery when compared to the general population.

摘要

背景

关于峡部裂性脊柱滑脱融合术后长期疗效的数据很少。

目的

研究峡部裂性脊柱滑脱融合术后患者报告的结果和邻近节段退变(ASD),并将患者报告的结果与对照组进行比较。

研究设计/设置:一项包括横断面对照组的前瞻性研究。

患者样本

接受后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)(n=86)或后路外侧融合术(PLF)(n=77)的峡部裂性脊柱滑脱患者。PLIF 组中有 73 例患者和 PLF 组中有 71 例患者在基线后 11 年(范围 5-16 年)时获得了患者报告的结果数据。PLIF 组中有 77 例患者和 PLF 组中有 54 例患者在基线后 14 年(范围 9-19 年)时拍摄了 X 线片。从人群中随机选择 136 人作为患者报告结果的对照组。

结果

患者报告的结果包括以下内容:总体结果、Oswestry 残疾指数、残疾评定指数和简短 36 项健康调查量表。使用加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)分级标准从 X 线片上确定 ASD。

方法

使用卡方检验或协方差分析(ANCOVA)进行组间比较。ANCOVA 调整了随访时间、吸烟、Meyerding 滑脱程度、是否滴酒不沾(是/否)以及在可用的情况下,依赖变量的基线水平。

结论

PLIF 组和 PLF 组之间患者报告的结果没有显著差异。PLIF 组 ASD 的患病率为 42%(32/77),PLF 组为 26%(14/54)(p=.98)。患者报告的结果数据表明,与对照组相比,接受手术治疗的峡部裂性脊柱滑脱患者的生理功能较低,疼痛较多。

PLIF 和 PLF 组具有相似的长期患者报告和影像学结果。与一般人群相比,患有峡部裂性脊柱滑脱的患者在手术后数年生理功能较低,疼痛较多。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome after spinal fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.成人峡部裂性脊柱滑脱后路融合术后的长期疗效。
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):501-508. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
2
[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].腰椎滑脱症腰骶融合术后相邻节段退变:一项回顾性影像学及临床分析
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30.
3
Restoration of the spinopelvic sagittal balance in isthmic spondylolisthesis: posterior lumbar interbody fusion may be better than posterolateral fusion.峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症中矢状面脊柱骨盆平衡的恢复:腰椎后路椎间融合术可能优于后外侧融合术。
Spine J. 2015 Jul 1;15(7):1527-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.036. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
4
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.成人峡部裂性腰椎滑脱的后路腰椎椎间融合术与后外侧融合术的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20):2178-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b1bd8.
5
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes.后路腰椎体间融合与后路经椎间孔椎体间融合并内固定术治疗低度峡部裂性滑脱:中期临床疗效。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Apr;14(4):488-96. doi: 10.3171/2010.11.SPINE10281. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
6
A systematic review of clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.成人峡部裂性脊柱滑脱症手术治疗的临床疗效的系统评价
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1441-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 May 7.
7
The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.137例腰椎滑脱症患者行椎间融合术与后外侧融合术的成本效益分析
Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
8
Comparison of posterolateral lumbar fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for patients younger than 60 years with isthmic spondylolisthesis.60岁以下峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症患者后路腰椎外侧融合术与后路腰椎椎间融合术的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Nov 15;39(24):E1475-80. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000596.
9
Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.腰椎滑脱症的后外侧融合联合椎间融合术与单纯后外侧融合术相比,再次手术的发生率更低。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;138:117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
10
Long-term outcome after posterolateral, anterior, and circumferential fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: magnetic resonance imaging findings after average of 17-year follow-up.儿童和青少年重度峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症行后外侧、前路及环形融合术后的长期疗效:平均17年随访后的磁共振成像结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Oct 1;31(21):2491-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000239218.38489.db.

引用本文的文献

1
Posterior lumbar fusion with and without interbody fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症行后路腰椎融合术加或不加椎间融合术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jul 28;48(1):581. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03703-x.
2
Surgical and non-surgical management of spondylolisthesis: a comprehensive review.腰椎滑脱症的手术与非手术治疗:一项综述
J Med Life. 2025 Mar;18(3):196-207. doi: 10.25122/jml-2025-0039.
3
Comparison of the smiley face rod method versus intervertebral fusion for the treatment of L5 spondylolysis in adults.
成人L5峡部裂治疗中笑脸棒法与椎间融合术的比较
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 15;11:1499773. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1499773. eCollection 2024.
4
Reduction of adolescent grade IV L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with anterior joystick manipulation during a combined anterior and posterior surgical approach: A case report.在前后联合手术入路中使用前路操纵杆手法复位青少年IV度L5-S1椎体滑脱:一例报告
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Aug 9;16:100263. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100263. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Interlaminar Percutaneous Endoscopic Uniportal Pars Decompression for Lumbar Spondylolysis.经皮内镜下单通道椎板间减压治疗腰椎峡部裂的临床疗效
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):335-342. doi: 10.14444/8413. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
6
MRI Characteristics at a Mean of Thirteen Years After Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery in Adolescents: A Case-Control Study.青少年腰椎间盘突出症手术后平均13年的MRI特征:一项病例对照研究
JB JS Open Access. 2021 Nov 19;6(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00081. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
7
Long-term (> 10 years) clinical outcomes of instrumented posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis.后路融合内固定术治疗腰椎滑脱症的 10 年以上临床疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1380-1386. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06671-6. Epub 2020 Dec 3.