Goldberg Julia E, Rosenkrantz Andrew B
Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019 Jul-Aug;48(4):308-311. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
To use Twitter to characterize public perspectives regarding artificial intelligence (AI) and radiology.
Twitter was searched for all tweets containing the terms "artificial intelligence" and "radiology" from November 2016 to October 2017. Users posting the tweets, tweet content, and linked websites were categorized.
Six hundred and five tweets were identified. These were from 407 unique users (most commonly industry-related individuals [22.6%]; radiologists only 9.3%) and linked to 216 unique websites. 42.5% of users were from the United States. The tweets mentioned machine/deep learning in 17.2%, industry in 14.0%, a medical society/conference in 13.4%, and a university in 9.8%. 6.3% mentioned a specific clinical application, most commonly oncology and lung/tuberculosis. 24.6% of tweets had a favorable stance regarding the impact of AI on radiology, 75.4% neutral, and none were unfavorable. 88.0% of linked websites leaned toward AI being positive for the field of radiology; none leaned toward AI being negative for the field. 51.9% of linked websites specifically mentioned improved efficiency for radiology with AI. 35.2% of websites described challenges for implementing AI in radiology. Of the 47.2% of websites that mentioned the issue of AI replacing radiologists, 77.5% leaned against AI replacing radiologists, 13.7% had a neutral view, and 8.8% leaned toward AI replacing radiologists.
These observations provide an overview of the social media discussions regarding AI in radiology. While noting challenges, the discussions were overwhelmingly positive toward the transformative impact of AI on radiology and leaned against AI replacing radiologists. Greater radiologist engagement in this online social media dialog is encouraged.
利用推特来描述公众对人工智能(AI)与放射学的看法。
检索推特上2016年11月至2017年10月期间所有包含术语“人工智能”和“放射学”的推文。对发布推文的用户、推文内容及相关链接网站进行分类。
共识别出605条推文。这些推文来自407个不同用户(最常见的是与行业相关的个人[22.6%];放射科医生仅占9.3%),并链接到216个不同网站。42.5%的用户来自美国。推文中提及机器学习/深度学习的占17.2%,提及行业的占14.0%,提及医学协会/会议的占13.4%,提及大学的占9.8%。6.3%提及特定临床应用,最常见的是肿瘤学以及肺部/结核病。24.6%的推文对AI对放射学的影响持积极态度,75.4%持中立态度,无负面态度。88.0%的相关链接网站倾向于认为AI对放射学领域有积极作用;无网站认为AI对该领域有负面影响。51.9%的相关链接网站特别提到AI可提高放射学效率。35.2%的网站描述了在放射学中实施AI的挑战。在提及AI取代放射科医生这一问题的47.2%的网站中,77.5%反对AI取代放射科医生,13.7%持中立观点,8.8%倾向于AI取代放射科医生。
这些观察结果概述了社交媒体上关于放射学中AI的讨论。在指出挑战的同时,这些讨论对AI对放射学的变革性影响总体持积极态度,且反对AI取代放射科医生。鼓励放射科医生更多地参与这种在线社交媒体对话。