1 Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Ave, New York, NY 10016.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):W48-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12705.
The purpose of this study was to assess perspectives and information relating to CT radiation risk on Twitter, a popular microblogging social network.
Publicly available posts on Twitter ("tweets") containing both the words "CT" and "radiation" were identified from the 1st week of each month in 2013. Type of user posting and source of linked articles were recorded. Two reviewers assessed the content of tweets and links regarding CT's benefit-to-risk ratio (favorable, unfavorable, etc.).
Six hundred twenty-one relevant tweets were tweeted by 557 unique users, of whom 90 (16%) were physicians (17 of these were radiologists), 30 (5%) were medical practices or hospitals, 34 (6%) were patients, 8 (1%) were physicists or technologists, and 395 (71%) were other types of users. Two hundred twenty-seven tweets included user commentary regarding CT's benefit-to-risk ratio, of which 134 (59%) were unfavorable or concerned, 65 (29%) were neutral, 22 (10%) were informative regarding CT dose reduction strategies, and only 6 (3%) were favorable. Four hundred seventy-two tweets (76%) included links to a total of 99 unique articles, of which 25 (25%) were unfavorable or concerned, 10 (10%) were favorable, 25 (25%) were neutral, and 39 (39%) were informative regarding CT dose reduction. Article types were non-peer-reviewed medical sources (n = 50), lay press (n = 15), peer-reviewed medical journals (n = 13), blogs (n = 12), advertisements (n = 5), and informational websites (n = 4).
The large majority of content on Twitter was either unfavorable or concerned regarding CT radiation risk. Most articles were not peer-reviewed and were posted by nonphysicians; posts by physicians were largely by nonradiologists. More active engagement on Twitter by radiologists and physicists and increased dissemination of peer-reviewed articles may achieve a more balanced representation and alleviate concerns regarding CT radiation risk on social networks.
本研究旨在评估 Twitter 上与 CT 辐射风险相关的观点和信息,Twitter 是一个流行的微博社交网络。
从 2013 年每个月的第一周,在 Twitter 上识别出包含“CT”和“辐射”这两个词的公开可用帖子(“推文”)。记录发布者的用户类型和链接文章的来源。两名评论员评估了推文和链接中关于 CT 利弊比(有利、不利等)的内容。
共有 621 条相关推文由 557 个唯一用户发布,其中 90 名(16%)为医生(其中 17 名是放射科医生),30 名(5%)为医疗实践或医院,34 名(6%)为患者,8 名(1%)为物理学家或技术员,395 名(71%)为其他类型的用户。227 条推文包含用户对 CT 利弊比的评论,其中 134 条(59%)表示不利或关注,65 条(29%)表示中立,22 条(10%)提供了关于 CT 剂量减少策略的信息,只有 6 条(3%)表示有利。472 条推文(76%)包含指向 99 个独特文章的链接,其中 25 条(25%)表示不利或关注,10 条(10%)表示有利,25 条(25%)表示中立,39 条(39%)提供了关于 CT 剂量减少的信息。文章类型是非同行评议的医学来源(n=50)、大众媒体(n=15)、同行评议的医学期刊(n=13)、博客(n=12)、广告(n=5)和信息网站(n=4)。
Twitter 上的大部分内容要么对 CT 辐射风险表示不利或关注,要么表示担忧。大多数文章没有经过同行评议,且由非医生发布;医生发布的文章主要来自非放射科医生。放射科医生和物理学家更积极地在 Twitter 上互动,并增加同行评议文章的传播,可能会实现更平衡的代表性,并减轻人们对社交网络中 CT 辐射风险的担忧。