• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

州级和个人层面因素与智力和发育障碍个体决策选择的关联。

Association of state-level and individual-level factors with choice making of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States.

University of Sydney, Centre for Disability Research and Policy, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Dec;83:77-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.08.008
PMID:30144747
Abstract

BACKGROUND

State-level factors have not been examined in research on choice, despite findings of between-state differences.

AIMS

To examine both individual and state-level factors associated with choice.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

We used multilevel modeling to explore two choice scales, support-related and everyday choice, based on the National Core Indicators (NCI) data from 2013-14.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

At the individual level, milder ID, greater mobility, fewer problem behaviors, answering questions independently, communicating verbally, and living in a non-agency setting, particularly independent settings, were associated with more choice for both scales. State-level factors overall explained variance for both scales, but were more strongly associated with support-related choice. A higher proportion of people with IDD living independently within the state predicted more support-related choice. High cost of living within a state predicted less everyday choice. Higher proportion of people living with family and lower proportion being served within a state predicted more everyday choice.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest further study of choice in relation to policies that: (1) increase independent living for individuals with IDD, and (2) assist individuals/families living in high cost states. State differences on important QOL outcomes are likely to be associated with economic and system-based factorsbeyond individual differences.

摘要

背景

尽管已经发现各州之间存在差异,但在有关选择的研究中,州一级的因素尚未得到检验。

目的

检验与选择相关的个体和州一级的因素。

方法和程序

我们使用多层次模型,根据 2013-14 年的国家核心指标(NCI)数据,探讨了与支持相关的和日常选择相关的两个选择量表。

结果和结论

在个体层面上,较轻的 ID、更高的流动性、较少的行为问题、独立回答问题、口头交流以及居住在非机构环境中,特别是独立环境中,与两个量表的更多选择有关。州一级的因素总体上解释了两个量表的差异,但与支持相关的选择的关联更强。州内独立生活的 IDD 人数比例较高,预测支持相关的选择更多。州内生活成本较高,预测日常选择较少。州内与家人一起生活的人数比例较高,而在州内接受服务的人数比例较低,预测日常选择更多。

这些发现表明,需要进一步研究与以下政策相关的选择:(1)增加 IDD 个体的独立生活,以及(2)帮助生活在高成本州的个人/家庭。重要的生活质量结果的州差异可能与个体差异之外的经济和基于系统的因素有关。

相似文献

1
Association of state-level and individual-level factors with choice making of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.州级和个人层面因素与智力和发育障碍个体决策选择的关联。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Dec;83:77-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
2
Correlates of everyday choice and support-related choice for 8,892 randomly sampled adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in 19 states.19 个州内 8892 名随机抽样的智力和发育障碍成年人日常选择和支持相关选择的相关性。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Dec;50(6):486-504. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-50.06.486.
3
Employment and choice-making for adults with intellectual disability, autism, and down syndrome.智力残疾、自闭症和唐氏综合征成年人的就业与决策
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Jun;65:23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
4
Factors associated with meeting physical activity guidelines by adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.智力和发育障碍成年人达到身体活动指南的相关因素。
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Mar;62:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
5
Self-directed support: impact of hiring practices on adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and families.自我指导支持:雇佣实践对智力和发育障碍成年人及其家庭的影响。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Nov;117(6):464-77. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.6.464.
6
Substance use among individuals with intellectual disabilities living independently in Flanders.在弗拉芒地区独立生活的智障人士中的物质使用情况。
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Apr;63:107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
7
Families of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: policy, funding, services, and experiences.智力和发展障碍者的家庭:政策、资金、服务和经验。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;51(5):349-59. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.349.
8
Choice-making among Medicaid HCBS and ICF/MR recipients in six states.六个州医疗补助家庭和社区基础服务(HCBS)及智力残疾/精神疾病机构化照顾(ICF/MR)接受者的选择情况
Am J Ment Retard. 2008 Sep;113(5):325-42. doi: 10.1352/2008.113.325-342.
9
Understanding Decision Making Among Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD) and Their Siblings.了解智力和发育障碍(IDD)个体及其兄弟姐妹的决策过程。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019 Feb;57(1):26-41. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-57.1.26.
10
Activities of daily living and transition to community living for adults with intellectual disabilities.智障成年人的日常生活活动及向社区生活的过渡
Scand J Occup Ther. 2017 Sep;24(5):357-365. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2016.1227369. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Personal Wellbeing, Choice and NDIS Individualised Planning and Support for People With Intellectual Disabilities.个人幸福感、选择与智力残疾人士的国家残疾保险计划个性化规划及支持之间的关系
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jul;38(4):e70085. doi: 10.1111/jar.70085.
2
Risk Adjustment in Home and Community Based Services Outcome Measurement.居家和社区服务结果测量中的风险调整
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Mar 29;3:830175. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.830175. eCollection 2022.
3
The Impact of Human Service Provider Quality on the Personal Outcomes of People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
人类服务提供者的质量对智力和发育障碍者个人成果的影响。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jan 17;2:780168. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.780168. eCollection 2021.
4
Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services.智力和发育障碍服务质量结果测量前沿的成功实践
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022;3. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.871178.
5
Measuring Four Personal Opportunities for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.衡量成年智力和发育障碍者的四个个人机会。
Inclusion (Wash). 2022;10(1):19-34. doi: 10.1352/2326-6988-10.1.19.
6
Incentives, Wages, and Retention Among Direct Support Professionals: National Core Indicators Staff Stability Survey.直接支持专业人员的激励措施、工资与留用情况:国家核心指标员工稳定性调查
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2022 Apr 1;60(2):113-127. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-60.2.113.
7
Measuring and Tracking Personal Opportunity Outcome Measures Over 3 Years to Guide Policy and Services That Promote Inclusive Community Living.三年内衡量和跟踪个人机会成果指标,以指导促进包容性社区生活的政策和服务。
Inclusion (Wash). 2020;8(4):335-350.
8
Aligning with the flow of control: A grounded theory study of choice and autonomy in decision-making practices of people with intellectual disabilities.与控制流保持一致:智力残疾人士决策实践中选择和自主性的扎根理论研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1857053. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1857053.