Suppr超能文献

多学科营养支持对老年住院患者的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of multidisciplinary nutritional support in older hospitalised patients: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

作者信息

Rasmussen Nanna M L, Belqaid Kerstin, Lugnet Kerstin, Nielsen Anni Linnet, Rasmussen Henrik Højgaard, Beck Anne Marie

机构信息

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Holstebro, Denmark.

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Function Area Clinical Nutrition, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018 Oct;27:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

Abstract

Malnutrition is common in older hospitalised patients. As the aetiology is multifactorial, nutritional care should involve a multidisciplinary team. However, the knowledge of the effectiveness of this strategy is limited. This systematic review aims at investigating the effectiveness of multidisciplinary nutritional support on mortality, readmissions and quality of life (QoL) in patients aged 65 years and above during hospitalisation and after discharge compared to usual practise. We conducted a series of systematic literature search from 2013 to 2017, with additional studies hand-searched from reference lists of retrieved publications. Eligible studies were controlled trials with a multidisciplinary nutritional intervention during hospitalisation and after discharge in older (65+) patients. A intervention by more than one profession incorporating a nutritional component was defined as "Multidisciplinary". The nutritional intervention included use of oral nutritional supplements (ONS), improved nutritional care, and/or dietary counselling. For quality assessment of studies, "Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias" was used. Conduction of meta-analyses were by combining data from homogenous trials. The search resulted in five studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria, but varied in quality and type of interventions used. 598 patients were included. Meta-analyses found improved QoL (MD 0.13 (0.02, 0.23), P = 0.01) and indicated tendencies towards lower mortality (OR 0.50 (0.22, 1.14), P = 0.10), in the intervention group vs. control group. Meta-analysis showed no difference between intervention and control group regarding readmissions during intervention (OR 1.04 (0.40, 2.70)) or at a 26 weeks follow-up (OR 0.84 (0.18, 3.82)) Although a small number of studies and a relatively small sample size, a suggestion is that provision of multidisciplinary nutritional support may have a positive effect on mortality and improves quality of life in older patients. There is a need for more high-quality studies including multidisciplinary nutritional support to verify these findings. Study registration in PROSPERO is no. CRD42016047997.

摘要

营养不良在老年住院患者中很常见。由于病因是多因素的,营养护理应由多学科团队参与。然而,关于这一策略有效性的了解有限。本系统评价旨在调查与常规护理相比,多学科营养支持对65岁及以上患者住院期间及出院后死亡率、再入院率和生活质量(QoL)的有效性。我们从2013年至2017年进行了一系列系统的文献检索,并从检索到的出版物的参考文献列表中手工搜索了其他研究。符合条件的研究为针对老年(65岁及以上)患者住院期间及出院后进行多学科营养干预的对照试验。由多个专业进行的包含营养成分的干预被定义为“多学科”。营养干预包括使用口服营养补充剂(ONS)、改善营养护理和/或饮食咨询。对于研究的质量评估,使用了“Cochrane协作网评估偏倚风险工具”。通过合并同类试验的数据进行荟萃分析。检索结果有五项研究符合纳入标准,但在质量和所用干预类型上存在差异。共纳入598例患者。荟萃分析发现,干预组与对照组相比,生活质量有所改善(MD 0.13(0.02,0.23),P = 0.01),且有死亡率降低的趋势(OR 0.50(0.22,1.14),P = 0.10)。荟萃分析显示,干预组与对照组在干预期间(OR 1.04(0.40,2.70))或26周随访时(OR 0.84(0.18,3.82))的再入院率无差异。尽管研究数量较少且样本量相对较小,但有迹象表明,提供多学科营养支持可能对老年患者的死亡率有积极影响,并改善其生活质量。需要更多包括多学科营养支持的高质量研究来验证这些发现。本研究在PROSPERO的注册号为CRD42016047997。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验