Spillantini M G, Massotti M
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986 May;24(5):1241-6. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90178-4.
In rabbits, pretreatment by intravenous (IV) and intracortical (IC) routes with low doses of morphine (250 micrograms/kg IV or 60 pmoles/rabbit IC) and naloxone (1-50 micrograms/kg IV or 0.3 pmoles/rabbit IC) antagonizes the EEG and behavioural seizures due to the IC injection of penicillin (150 Units) at the level of the sensorimotor cortex. Pretreatment with naloxone (20 micrograms/kg IV) did not alter the anticonvulsant effect of morphine (250 micrograms/kg IV). The similar anticonvulsant effect of the two drugs together with the absence of any antagonism by naloxone on the effect of morphine seem to suggest that both drugs act through a non-opioid receptor-mediated mechanism. Further, in light of the low effective doses of the drugs and of the absence of any additive effect after their combined administration, one might speculate that morphine and naloxone do not act through different pharmacological receptors. However, the presence of distinct EEG patterns with either morphine or naloxone, injected IC and IV, in animals fully protected against penicillin-induced seizures, does not seem to be in favour of the latter possibility.
在家兔中,通过静脉注射(IV)和皮质内注射(IC)途径,用低剂量吗啡(250微克/千克静脉注射或60皮摩尔/兔皮质内注射)和纳洛酮(1 - 50微克/千克静脉注射或0.3皮摩尔/兔皮质内注射)进行预处理,可拮抗因在感觉运动皮质水平皮质内注射青霉素(150单位)所致的脑电图(EEG)和行为性癫痫发作。用纳洛酮(20微克/千克静脉注射)预处理并未改变吗啡(250微克/千克静脉注射)的抗惊厥作用。两种药物相似的抗惊厥作用以及纳洛酮对吗啡作用无任何拮抗作用,似乎表明两种药物均通过非阿片受体介导的机制发挥作用。此外,鉴于药物的有效剂量较低且联合给药后无任何相加作用,有人可能推测吗啡和纳洛酮并非通过不同的药理受体发挥作用。然而,在家兔中,通过皮质内注射和静脉注射给予吗啡或纳洛酮后,出现了不同的脑电图模式,这些家兔对青霉素诱导的癫痫发作具有完全的保护作用,这似乎不支持后一种可能性。