Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pharmaceutical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;73(2):160-169. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that balanced crystalloids improve quality of recovery more than normal saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) in stable emergency department (ED) patients. Secondary outcomes measured differences in health care use.
A single-site, participant- and evaluator-blinded, 2-arm parallel allocation (1:1), comparative effectiveness, randomized controlled trial allocated adults receiving intravenous fluids in the ED before discharge to receive 2 L of lactated Ringer's solution or normal saline solution. The primary outcome was symptom scores measured by the validated Quality of Recovery-40 instrument (scores 40 to 200) 24 hours after enrollment. Secondary outcomes included subsequent health care use and medication compliance.
Participants (N=157) were enrolled and follow-up was analyzed for 94 (follow-up rate of 60%) with intention-to-treat methodology. There was no difference in postenrollment Quality of Recovery-40 scores between normal saline solution and lactated Ringer's solution groups (mean difference 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.8 to 11.6). Although preenrollment scores were higher in the lactated Ringer's solution group (mean difference 10.5; 95% CI 1.9 to 19.0), adjusting for presurvey imbalances did not change the primary outcome (adjusted difference -3.9; 95% CI -12.9 to 5.2). There were no differences in return to ED (mean difference 7.5%; 95% CI -8.7% to 23.8%), prescriptions filled (mean difference 22.2%; 95% CI -3.3% to 47.6%), or seeking care from another provider (mean difference -2.0%; 95% CI -19.9% to 15.9%) at 7 days.
Normal saline solution and lactated Ringer's solution were associated with similar 24-hour recovery scores and 7-day health care use in stable ED patients. These results supplement those of recent trials by informing fluid choice for stable ED patients.
本研究旨在检验以下假设,即平衡晶体液比生理盐水(0.9%氯化钠)更能改善稳定急诊科(ED)患者的康复质量。次要结局指标测量了医疗保健使用的差异。
一项单中心、参与者和评估者双盲、2 臂平行分配(1:1)、比较有效性、随机对照试验,将在 ED 接受静脉输液的成年人在出院前分配接受 2L 乳酸林格氏液或生理盐水。主要结局是通过验证的康复质量-40 工具(评分 40 至 200)在入组后 24 小时测量的症状评分。次要结局包括随后的医疗保健使用和药物依从性。
共纳入 157 名参与者,并对 94 名(随访率为 60%)进行了意向治疗分析。生理盐水组和乳酸林格氏液组之间,入组后康复质量-40 评分无差异(平均差值 2.4;95%置信区间 [CI] -6.8 至 11.6)。尽管乳酸林格氏液组的预调查评分较高(平均差值 10.5;95%CI 1.9 至 19.0),但调整预调查不平衡并未改变主要结局(调整差值 -3.9;95%CI -12.9 至 5.2)。在 7 天内,返回 ED(平均差值 7.5%;95%CI -8.7%至 23.8%)、开处方(平均差值 22.2%;95%CI -3.3%至 47.6%)或向其他提供者寻求治疗(平均差值 -2.0%;95%CI -19.9%至 15.9%)的差异无统计学意义。
在稳定的 ED 患者中,生理盐水和乳酸林格氏液与相似的 24 小时恢复评分和 7 天的医疗保健使用相关。这些结果通过为稳定的 ED 患者提供液体选择,补充了最近的试验结果。