Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激对图片命名的促进作用:特定项目、任务通用,还是两者皆非?

tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither?

作者信息

Payne Joshua S, Tainturier Marie-Josèphe

机构信息

Bilingual Aphasia Lab, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.

Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2018 Aug 10;12:549. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00549. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to clarify the conditions under which anodal tDCS applied to left hemisphere language sites may facilitate picture naming latencies in healthy young adults. We built upon previous studies by directly testing for item-specific and generalized effects of tDCS through manipulation of item-familiarization and through testing for both online and offline effects of stimulation, in the same paradigm. In addition, we tested for the robustness of these effects by comparing two left hemisphere sites critical for lexical retrieval. Twenty-eight healthy young adults completed two testing sessions receiving either anodal (1.5 mA, 20 min) or sham stimulation (1.5 mA, 30 s) in each session. Half of the participants received tDCS over the left inferior frontal region and the other half over the left posterior superior temporal region. All participants were asked to a name a set of pictures and their response latencies were compared at three time points (before, during, and after the end of stimulation). The stimulus set was constructed so that some items were presented at all time points, some before and after stimulation, and some during stimulation only. A parsimonious linear mixed effects model (LMM) revealed robust repetition priming effects as latencies were reliably faster for previously named items in all conditions. However, active tDCS did not produce any additional facilitation in relation to sham, and even led to slower performance in the IFG group when the stimulated items differed from those tested at baseline and post-test. Our findings add to the present debate about the efficacy of single-session tDCS for modulation of lexical retrieval in healthy young adults. We conclude that future research should take a more systematic, step-wise approach to the application of tDCS to the study of language and that more sensitive experimental paradigms, which include a training element, are more adapted to the study of cognitive processes in populations with optimal levels of cortical excitability.

摘要

本研究的目的是阐明在何种条件下,对健康年轻成年人的左半球语言区域施加阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可促进图片命名潜伏期。我们在前人研究的基础上,通过在同一范式中操纵项目熟悉度以及测试刺激的在线和离线效应,直接检验tDCS的项目特异性和泛化效应。此外,我们通过比较对词汇检索至关重要的两个左半球部位,来测试这些效应的稳健性。28名健康年轻成年人完成了两个测试阶段,每个阶段接受阳极刺激(1.5毫安,20分钟)或假刺激(1.5毫安,30秒)。一半参与者在左下额叶区域接受tDCS,另一半在左后颞上区域接受tDCS。所有参与者被要求命名一组图片,并在三个时间点(刺激前、刺激期间和刺激结束后)比较他们的反应潜伏期。刺激集的构建方式是,一些项目在所有时间点呈现,一些在刺激前后呈现,一些仅在刺激期间呈现。一个简约的线性混合效应模型(LMM)显示出强大的重复启动效应,因为在所有条件下,先前命名的项目的潜伏期确实更快。然而,与假刺激相比,主动tDCS并没有产生任何额外的促进作用,当受刺激的项目与基线和测试后测试的项目不同时,甚至导致IFG组的表现更慢。我们的研究结果为目前关于单节段tDCS对健康年轻成年人词汇检索调节功效的争论增添了内容。我们得出结论,未来的研究应该采取更系统、逐步的方法将tDCS应用于语言研究,并且更敏感的实验范式,包括训练元素,更适合研究具有最佳皮质兴奋性水平人群的认知过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ce/6095956/987b9e9c36d3/fnins-12-00549-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验