Klaus Jana, Schutter Dennis J L G
Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Brain Cogn. 2018 Jun;123:10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has become a common method to study the interrelations between the brain and language functioning. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the study of language production in healthy volunteers. Forty-five effect sizes from 30 studies which investigated the effects of NIBS on picture naming or verbal fluency in healthy participants were meta-analysed. Further sub-analyses investigated potential influences of stimulation type, control, target site, task, online vs. offline application, and current density of the target electrode. Random effects modelling showed a small, but reliable effect of NIBS on language production. Subsequent analyses indicated larger weighted mean effect sizes for TMS as compared to tDCS studies. No statistical differences for the other sub-analyses were observed. We conclude that NIBS is a useful method for neuroscientific studies on language production in healthy volunteers.
非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)已成为研究大脑与语言功能之间相互关系的常用方法。这项荟萃分析考察了经颅磁刺激(TMS)和直流电刺激(tDCS)在健康志愿者语言产生研究中的疗效。对30项研究中的45个效应量进行了荟萃分析,这些研究调查了NIBS对健康参与者图片命名或言语流畅性的影响。进一步的亚分析考察了刺激类型、对照、靶点部位、任务、在线与离线应用以及靶点电极电流密度的潜在影响。随机效应模型显示NIBS对语言产生有微小但可靠的影响。后续分析表明,与tDCS研究相比,TMS的加权平均效应量更大。其他亚分析未观察到统计学差异。我们得出结论,NIBS是健康志愿者语言产生神经科学研究的一种有用方法。