Andrews J, Borgerhoff Mulder M
1Department of Anthropology, UC Davis, Davis, USA.
2Graduate Group in Ecology, UC Davis, Davis, USA.
Sustain Sci. 2018;13(1):93-107. doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0489-2. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
Evolutionary analyses of the ways humans manage natural resources have until recently focused on the costs and benefits of prudent resource use to the individual. In contrast, the fields of environmental resource management and sustainability focus on institutions whereby successful practices can be established and maintained, and the extent to which these fit specific environmental conditions. Furthermore, recent theoretical work explores how resource conservation practices and institutions can emerge through co-evolutionary processes if there are substantial group-level benefits. Here we examine the design of a prominent yet controversial institutional intervention for reducing deforestation and land degradation in the developing world (REDD+), and its ongoing implementation on Pemba Island (Zanzibar, Tanzania) to determine the extent to which the features of REDD+ might allow for the endogenous adoption of sustainable forest management institutions. Additionally, we consider factors that might impede such outcomes, such as leakage, elite capture, and marginal community participation. By focusing on prospective features of REDD+ design that could facilitate the spread of environmentally sustainable behavior within and between communities, we identify distinct dynamics whereby institutional practices might coevolve with resource conservation practices. These insights should contribute to the design of more effective forest management institution in the future.
直到最近,对人类管理自然资源方式的进化分析都集中在审慎使用资源给个体带来的成本和收益上。相比之下,环境资源管理和可持续发展领域关注的是能够建立和维持成功实践的制度,以及这些制度与特定环境条件的契合程度。此外,最近的理论研究探讨了如果存在显著的群体层面的益处,资源保护实践和制度如何能够通过共同进化过程而出现。在这里,我们研究了一种旨在减少发展中国家森林砍伐和土地退化的突出但有争议的制度性干预措施(REDD+)的设计,以及它在奔巴岛(坦桑尼亚桑给巴尔)的持续实施情况,以确定REDD+的特征在多大程度上可能允许内生性地采用可持续森林管理制度。此外,我们还考虑了可能阻碍这种结果的因素,如泄漏、精英俘获和边缘社区参与。通过关注REDD+设计中可能促进社区内部和社区之间环境可持续行为传播的前瞻性特征,我们确定了制度实践可能与资源保护实践共同进化的不同动态。这些见解应有助于未来设计更有效的森林管理制度。