• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化群体选择与减少毁林和森林退化所致排放加量机制(REDD+)的设计:来自奔巴岛的见解

Cultural group selection and the design of REDD+: insights from Pemba.

作者信息

Andrews J, Borgerhoff Mulder M

机构信息

1Department of Anthropology, UC Davis, Davis, USA.

2Graduate Group in Ecology, UC Davis, Davis, USA.

出版信息

Sustain Sci. 2018;13(1):93-107. doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0489-2. Epub 2017 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1007/s11625-017-0489-2
PMID:30147773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6086255/
Abstract

Evolutionary analyses of the ways humans manage natural resources have until recently focused on the costs and benefits of prudent resource use to the individual. In contrast, the fields of environmental resource management and sustainability focus on institutions whereby successful practices can be established and maintained, and the extent to which these fit specific environmental conditions. Furthermore, recent theoretical work explores how resource conservation practices and institutions can emerge through co-evolutionary processes if there are substantial group-level benefits. Here we examine the design of a prominent yet controversial institutional intervention for reducing deforestation and land degradation in the developing world (REDD+), and its ongoing implementation on Pemba Island (Zanzibar, Tanzania) to determine the extent to which the features of REDD+ might allow for the endogenous adoption of sustainable forest management institutions. Additionally, we consider factors that might impede such outcomes, such as leakage, elite capture, and marginal community participation. By focusing on prospective features of REDD+ design that could facilitate the spread of environmentally sustainable behavior within and between communities, we identify distinct dynamics whereby institutional practices might coevolve with resource conservation practices. These insights should contribute to the design of more effective forest management institution in the future.

摘要

直到最近,对人类管理自然资源方式的进化分析都集中在审慎使用资源给个体带来的成本和收益上。相比之下,环境资源管理和可持续发展领域关注的是能够建立和维持成功实践的制度,以及这些制度与特定环境条件的契合程度。此外,最近的理论研究探讨了如果存在显著的群体层面的益处,资源保护实践和制度如何能够通过共同进化过程而出现。在这里,我们研究了一种旨在减少发展中国家森林砍伐和土地退化的突出但有争议的制度性干预措施(REDD+)的设计,以及它在奔巴岛(坦桑尼亚桑给巴尔)的持续实施情况,以确定REDD+的特征在多大程度上可能允许内生性地采用可持续森林管理制度。此外,我们还考虑了可能阻碍这种结果的因素,如泄漏、精英俘获和边缘社区参与。通过关注REDD+设计中可能促进社区内部和社区之间环境可持续行为传播的前瞻性特征,我们确定了制度实践可能与资源保护实践共同进化的不同动态。这些见解应有助于未来设计更有效的森林管理制度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c02/6086255/efbbeeb10fb3/11625_2017_489_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c02/6086255/2e983b51e331/11625_2017_489_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c02/6086255/caf7bc1fe21e/11625_2017_489_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c02/6086255/efbbeeb10fb3/11625_2017_489_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c02/6086255/2e983b51e331/11625_2017_489_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c02/6086255/caf7bc1fe21e/11625_2017_489_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c02/6086255/efbbeeb10fb3/11625_2017_489_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural group selection and the design of REDD+: insights from Pemba.文化群体选择与减少毁林和森林退化所致排放加量机制(REDD+)的设计:来自奔巴岛的见解
Sustain Sci. 2018;13(1):93-107. doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0489-2. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
2
Pathways of REDD+ Piloting in Enhancing Sustainable Forest Management: The Case of Masito-Ugalla Ecosystem, Western Tanzania.“REDD+”试点促进可持续森林管理的途径:以坦桑尼亚西部的马西托-乌加拉生态系统为例
Environ Manage. 2023 Jan;71(1):55-73. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01627-6. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
The community resource management area mechanism: a strategy to manage African forest resources for REDD+.社区资源管理领域机制:用于管理 REDD+ 下的非洲森林资源的策略。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jul 22;368(1625):20120311. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0311. Print 2013.
4
Avoiding re-inventing the wheel in a people-centered approach to REDD+.在以人为主的减少毁林和森林退化所致排放量方法中避免重复造轮子。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Oct;28(5):1380-93. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12301. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
5
Top-down, Bottom-up and Sideways: The Multilayered Complexities of Multi-level Actors Shaping Forest Governance and REDD+ Arrangements in Madre de Dios, Peru.自上而下、自下而上和横向:塑造秘鲁马德雷德迪奥斯森林治理和 REDD+ 安排的多层次行动者的复杂情况。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jul;62(1):98-116. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0982-5. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
6
Beyond opportunity costs: who bears the implementation costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation?除机会成本外:谁承担减少森林砍伐和森林退化所致排放的实施成本?
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2018;23(2):291-310. doi: 10.1007/s11027-016-9736-6. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
7
Land use, REDD+ and the status of wildlife populations in Yaeda Valley, northern Tanzania.土地利用、REDD+ 和坦桑尼亚北部 Yaeda 山谷野生动物种群的状况。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214823. eCollection 2019.
8
Implementing REDD+ at the local level: Assessing the key enablers for credible mitigation and sustainable livelihood outcomes.在地方层面实施 REDD+:评估可信减排和可持续生计成果的关键促成因素。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Jul 1;157:238-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
9
A bottom-up approach to estimating cost elements of REDD+ pilot projects in Tanzania.自上而下的方法来估算坦桑尼亚 REDD+ 试点项目的成本要素。
Carbon Balance Manag. 2012 Aug 9;7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1750-0680-7-9.
10
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): game changer or just another quick fix?减少毁林和森林退化所致排放(REDD+):游戏规则改变者还是又一个权宜之计?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1249:137-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06306.x. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Paradoxes in the coevolution of contagions and institutions.传染病与制度的共同进化悖论。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Aug;291(2028):20241117. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1117. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Characteristic processes of human evolution caused the Anthropocene and may obstruct its global solutions.人类进化的特征过程导致了人类世的出现,并可能阻碍其全球解决方案的实施。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan;379(1893):20220259. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0259. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Long-distance social relationships can both undercut and promote local natural resource management.

本文引用的文献

1
Cash for carbon: A randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation.碳补偿:减少森林砍伐的生态系统服务支付的随机试验。
Science. 2017 Jul 21;357(6348):267-273. doi: 10.1126/science.aan0568.
2
Cultural group selection follows Darwin's classic syllogism for the operation of selection.文化群体选择遵循达尔文关于选择运作的经典三段论。
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e58. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000606.
3
When Did the Swahili Become Maritime?斯瓦希里人何时开始从事航海活动?
远距离的社会关系既能削弱又能促进当地自然资源管理。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan;379(1893):20220269. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0269. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Integrating evolutionary theory and social-ecological systems research to address the sustainability challenges of the Anthropocene.将进化理论与社会-生态系统研究相结合,以应对人类世的可持续性挑战。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan;379(1893):20220262. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0262. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
5
Organizational Development as Generative Entrenchment.作为生成性固化的组织发展
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jun 26;24(7):879. doi: 10.3390/e24070879.
6
The cultural evolution and ecology of institutions.制度的文化进化与生态
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200047. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0047. Epub 2021 May 17.
7
Sociocultural heterogeneity in a common pool resource dilemma.社会文化异质性与公共资源困境。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210561. eCollection 2019.
Am Anthropol. 2015 Mar;117(1):100-115. doi: 10.1111/aman.12171.
4
An economic experiment reveals that humans prefer pool punishment to maintain the commons.一项经济实验表明,人类更倾向于采用集体惩罚来维护公共资源。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 22;279(1743):3716-21. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0937. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
5
Success-biased social learning: cultural and evolutionary dynamics.成功偏向的社会学习:文化与进化动态
Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Nov;82(3):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
6
Sustainable institutionalized punishment requires elimination of second-order free-riders.可持续的制度化惩罚需要消除二阶搭便车者。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:344. doi: 10.1038/srep00344. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
7
Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans.集中制裁和合法权威促进了人类的合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11023-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105456108. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
8
Rapid cultural adaptation can facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperation.快速的文化适应能够促进大规模合作的演变。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011 Mar;65(3):431-444. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1100-3. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
9
Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management.有条件的合作和昂贵的监督解释了森林公地管理的成功。
Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):961-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1193649.
10
Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons.社会学习促进了对公共资源进行管理的制度的形成。
Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):861-3. doi: 10.1038/nature09203. Epub 2010 Jul 14.