Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239.
Department of Pharmacology, and.
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 10;38(41):8737-8744. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0516-18.2018. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins negatively modulate presynaptic μ-opioid receptor inhibition of GABA release in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG). Paradoxically, we find that G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation of G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K channels (GIRKs) in the vlPAG is reduced in an agonist- and receptor-dependent manner in transgenic knock-in mice of either sex expressing mutant RGS-insensitive Gαo proteins. μ-Opioid receptor agonist activation of GIRK currents was reduced for DAMGO and fentanyl but not for [Met]-enkephalin acetate salt hydrate (ME) in the RGS-insensitive heterozygous (Het) mice compared with wild-type mice. The GABA agonist baclofen-induced GIRK currents were also reduced in the Het mice. We confirmed the role of Gαo proteins in μ-opioid receptor and GABA receptor signaling pathways in wild-type mice using myristoylated peptide inhibitors of Gαo and Gαi The results using these inhibitors indicate that receptor activation of GIRK channels is dependent on the preference of the agonist-stimulated receptor for Gαo versus that for Gαi. DAMGO and fentanyl-mediated GIRK currents were reduced in the presence of the Gαo inhibitor, but not the Gαi inhibitors. In contrast, the Gαo peptide inhibitor did not affect ME activation of GIRK currents, which is consistent with results in the Het mice, but the Gαi inhibitors significantly reduced ME-mediated GIRK currents. Finally, the reduction in GIRK activation in the Het mice plays a role in opioid- and baclofen-mediated spinal antinociception, but not supraspinal antinociception. Thus, our studies indicate that RGS proteins have multiple mechanisms of modulating GPCR signaling that produce negative and positive regulation of signaling depending on the effector. Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins positively modulate GPCR coupling to GIRKs, and this coupling is critical for opioid- and baclofen-mediated spinal antinociception, whereas μ-opioid receptor-mediated supraspinal antinociception depends on presynaptic inhibition that is negatively regulated by RGS proteins. The identification of these opposite roles for RGS proteins has implications for signaling via other GPCRs.
G 蛋白信号调节蛋白(RGS)负向调节腹外侧导水管周围灰质(vlPAG)中 μ 阿片受体抑制 GABA 释放。矛盾的是,我们发现 G 蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)激活 G 蛋白门控内向整流钾通道(GIRK)在表达突变型 RGS 不敏感 Gαo 蛋白的转基因敲入小鼠中以激动剂和受体依赖性方式降低。与野生型小鼠相比,DAMGO 和芬太尼激动 μ 阿片受体激活 GIRK 电流降低,但 [Met]-脑啡肽醋酸盐盐水(ME)没有降低,在 RGS 不敏感杂合子(Het)小鼠中。GABA 激动剂巴氯芬诱导的 GIRK 电流也降低了 Het 小鼠。我们使用 Gαo 和 Gαi 的豆蔻酰化肽抑制剂在野生型小鼠中证实了 Gαo 蛋白在 μ 阿片受体和 GABA 受体信号通路中的作用。使用这些抑制剂的结果表明,GIRK 通道的受体激活取决于激动剂刺激的受体对 Gαo 与 Gαi 的偏好。在 Gαo 抑制剂存在的情况下,DAMGO 和芬太尼介导的 GIRK 电流降低,但 Gαi 抑制剂不降低。相反,Gαo 肽抑制剂不影响 ME 激活的 GIRK 电流,这与 Het 小鼠的结果一致,但 Gαi 抑制剂显著降低了 ME 介导的 GIRK 电流。最后,Het 小鼠中 GIRK 激活的减少在阿片类药物和巴氯芬介导的脊髓镇痛中起作用,但在脊髓镇痛中不起作用。因此,我们的研究表明,RGS 蛋白具有多种调节 GPCR 信号的机制,根据效应物产生负向和正向调节。G 蛋白信号调节蛋白(RGS)正向调节 GPCR 与 GIRKs 的偶联,这种偶联对于阿片类药物和巴氯芬介导的脊髓镇痛至关重要,而 μ 阿片受体介导的脊髓镇痛依赖于 RGS 蛋白负向调节的突触前抑制。RGS 蛋白的这些相反作用的鉴定对其他 GPCR 信号具有启示意义。