Suppr超能文献

众包拓展中国男男性行为人群中 HIV 检测:一项封闭队列递进式楔形集群随机对照试验。

Crowdsourcing to expand HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: A closed cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

University of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.

Social Entrepreneurship to Spur Health (SESH) Global, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2018 Aug 28;15(8):e1002645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002645. eCollection 2018 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

HIV testing rates are suboptimal among at-risk men. Crowdsourcing may be a useful tool for designing innovative, community-based HIV testing strategies to increase HIV testing. The purpose of this study was to use a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effect of a crowdsourced HIV intervention on HIV testing uptake among men who have sex with men (MSM) in eight Chinese cities.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

An HIV testing intervention was developed through a national image contest, a regional strategy designathon, and local message contests. The final intervention included a multimedia HIV testing campaign, an online HIV testing service, and local testing promotion campaigns tailored for MSM. This intervention was evaluated using a closed cohort stepped wedge cluster RCT in eight Chinese cities (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, and Jiangmen in Guangdong province; Jinan, Qingdao, Yantai, and Jining in Shandong province) from August 2016 to August 2017. MSM were recruited through Blued, a social networking mobile application for MSM, from July 29 to August 21 of 2016. The primary outcome was self-reported HIV testing in the past 3 months. Secondary outcomes included HIV self-testing, facility-based HIV testing, condom use, and syphilis testing. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to analyze primary and secondary outcomes. We enrolled a total of 1,381 MSM. Most were ≤30 years old (82%), unmarried (86%), and had a college degree or higher (65%). The proportion of individuals receiving an HIV test during the intervention periods within a city was 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-15.5) greater than during the control periods. In addition, the intention-to-treat analysis showed a higher probability of receiving an HIV test during the intervention periods as compared to the control periods (estimated risk ratio [RR] = 1.43, 95% CI 1.19-1.73). The intervention also increased HIV self-testing (RR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.50-2.38). There was no effect on facility-based HIV testing (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.79-1.26), condom use (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.17), or syphilis testing (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.70-1.21). A total of 48.6% (593/1,219) of participants reported that they received HIV self-testing. Among men who received two HIV tests, 32 individuals seroconverted during the 1-year study period. Study limitations include the use of self-reported HIV testing data among a subset of men and non-completion of the final survey by 23% of participants. Our study population was a young online group in urban China and the relevance of our findings to other populations will require further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this setting, crowdsourcing was effective for developing and strengthening community-based HIV testing services for MSM. Crowdsourced interventions may be an important tool for the scale-up of HIV testing services among MSM in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02796963.

摘要

背景

高危男性的 HIV 检测率不理想。众包可能是设计创新的基于社区的 HIV 检测策略的有用工具,以增加 HIV 检测。本研究旨在使用阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验(RCT)评估一项众包 HIV 干预措施对中国八个城市男男性行为者(MSM)中 HIV 检测率的影响。

方法和发现

通过全国形象大赛、区域战略设计大赛和当地信息竞赛,开发了一项 HIV 检测干预措施。最终的干预措施包括多媒体 HIV 检测运动、在线 HIV 检测服务以及针对 MSM 的当地检测推广活动。这项干预措施在中国八个城市(广东的广州、深圳、珠海和江门;山东的济南、青岛、烟台和济宁)进行了封闭队列阶梯式楔形集群 RCT 评估,时间为 2016 年 8 月至 2017 年 8 月。MSM 通过 Blued(一款专为 MSM 设计的社交网络移动应用程序)招募,招募时间为 2016 年 7 月 29 日至 8 月 21 日。主要结局是过去 3 个月内自我报告的 HIV 检测。次要结局包括 HIV 自检、医疗机构 HIV 检测、安全套使用和梅毒检测。采用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)分析主要和次要结局。我们共招募了 1381 名 MSM。大多数人年龄在 30 岁以下(82%)、未婚(86%)、拥有大学学历或更高学历(65%)。与对照期相比,城市内干预期内接受 HIV 检测的比例高 8.9%(95%置信区间 [CI] 2.2-15.5)。此外,意向治疗分析显示,与对照期相比,干预期接受 HIV 检测的可能性更高(估计风险比 [RR] = 1.43,95%CI 1.19-1.73)。该干预措施还增加了 HIV 自检(RR = 1.89,95%CI 1.50-2.38)。但对医疗机构 HIV 检测(RR = 1.00,95%CI 0.79-1.26)、安全套使用(RR = 1.00,95%CI 0.86-1.17)或梅毒检测(RR = 0.92,95%CI 0.70-1.21)没有影响。共有 48.6%(593/1219)的参与者报告他们接受了 HIV 自检。在接受两次 HIV 检测的男性中,有 32 人在 1 年研究期间出现血清转化。研究的局限性包括在一小部分男性中使用自我报告的 HIV 检测数据,以及 23%的参与者没有完成最终调查。我们的研究人群是中国城市中年轻的在线群体,因此我们的研究结果与其他人群的相关性还需要进一步研究。

结论

在这种情况下,众包在开发和加强 MSM 的基于社区的 HIV 检测服务方面非常有效。众包干预措施可能是在中低收入国家(LMIC)扩大 MSM 的 HIV 检测服务的重要工具。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02796963。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/85f0a9fc8192/pmed.1002645.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验