• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

众包拓展中国男男性行为人群中 HIV 检测:一项封闭队列递进式楔形集群随机对照试验。

Crowdsourcing to expand HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: A closed cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

University of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.

Social Entrepreneurship to Spur Health (SESH) Global, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2018 Aug 28;15(8):e1002645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002645. eCollection 2018 Aug.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002645
PMID:30153265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6112627/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

HIV testing rates are suboptimal among at-risk men. Crowdsourcing may be a useful tool for designing innovative, community-based HIV testing strategies to increase HIV testing. The purpose of this study was to use a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effect of a crowdsourced HIV intervention on HIV testing uptake among men who have sex with men (MSM) in eight Chinese cities.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

An HIV testing intervention was developed through a national image contest, a regional strategy designathon, and local message contests. The final intervention included a multimedia HIV testing campaign, an online HIV testing service, and local testing promotion campaigns tailored for MSM. This intervention was evaluated using a closed cohort stepped wedge cluster RCT in eight Chinese cities (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, and Jiangmen in Guangdong province; Jinan, Qingdao, Yantai, and Jining in Shandong province) from August 2016 to August 2017. MSM were recruited through Blued, a social networking mobile application for MSM, from July 29 to August 21 of 2016. The primary outcome was self-reported HIV testing in the past 3 months. Secondary outcomes included HIV self-testing, facility-based HIV testing, condom use, and syphilis testing. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to analyze primary and secondary outcomes. We enrolled a total of 1,381 MSM. Most were ≤30 years old (82%), unmarried (86%), and had a college degree or higher (65%). The proportion of individuals receiving an HIV test during the intervention periods within a city was 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-15.5) greater than during the control periods. In addition, the intention-to-treat analysis showed a higher probability of receiving an HIV test during the intervention periods as compared to the control periods (estimated risk ratio [RR] = 1.43, 95% CI 1.19-1.73). The intervention also increased HIV self-testing (RR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.50-2.38). There was no effect on facility-based HIV testing (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.79-1.26), condom use (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.17), or syphilis testing (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.70-1.21). A total of 48.6% (593/1,219) of participants reported that they received HIV self-testing. Among men who received two HIV tests, 32 individuals seroconverted during the 1-year study period. Study limitations include the use of self-reported HIV testing data among a subset of men and non-completion of the final survey by 23% of participants. Our study population was a young online group in urban China and the relevance of our findings to other populations will require further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this setting, crowdsourcing was effective for developing and strengthening community-based HIV testing services for MSM. Crowdsourced interventions may be an important tool for the scale-up of HIV testing services among MSM in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02796963.

摘要

背景

高危男性的 HIV 检测率不理想。众包可能是设计创新的基于社区的 HIV 检测策略的有用工具,以增加 HIV 检测。本研究旨在使用阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验(RCT)评估一项众包 HIV 干预措施对中国八个城市男男性行为者(MSM)中 HIV 检测率的影响。

方法和发现

通过全国形象大赛、区域战略设计大赛和当地信息竞赛,开发了一项 HIV 检测干预措施。最终的干预措施包括多媒体 HIV 检测运动、在线 HIV 检测服务以及针对 MSM 的当地检测推广活动。这项干预措施在中国八个城市(广东的广州、深圳、珠海和江门;山东的济南、青岛、烟台和济宁)进行了封闭队列阶梯式楔形集群 RCT 评估,时间为 2016 年 8 月至 2017 年 8 月。MSM 通过 Blued(一款专为 MSM 设计的社交网络移动应用程序)招募,招募时间为 2016 年 7 月 29 日至 8 月 21 日。主要结局是过去 3 个月内自我报告的 HIV 检测。次要结局包括 HIV 自检、医疗机构 HIV 检测、安全套使用和梅毒检测。采用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)分析主要和次要结局。我们共招募了 1381 名 MSM。大多数人年龄在 30 岁以下(82%)、未婚(86%)、拥有大学学历或更高学历(65%)。与对照期相比,城市内干预期内接受 HIV 检测的比例高 8.9%(95%置信区间 [CI] 2.2-15.5)。此外,意向治疗分析显示,与对照期相比,干预期接受 HIV 检测的可能性更高(估计风险比 [RR] = 1.43,95%CI 1.19-1.73)。该干预措施还增加了 HIV 自检(RR = 1.89,95%CI 1.50-2.38)。但对医疗机构 HIV 检测(RR = 1.00,95%CI 0.79-1.26)、安全套使用(RR = 1.00,95%CI 0.86-1.17)或梅毒检测(RR = 0.92,95%CI 0.70-1.21)没有影响。共有 48.6%(593/1219)的参与者报告他们接受了 HIV 自检。在接受两次 HIV 检测的男性中,有 32 人在 1 年研究期间出现血清转化。研究的局限性包括在一小部分男性中使用自我报告的 HIV 检测数据,以及 23%的参与者没有完成最终调查。我们的研究人群是中国城市中年轻的在线群体,因此我们的研究结果与其他人群的相关性还需要进一步研究。

结论

在这种情况下,众包在开发和加强 MSM 的基于社区的 HIV 检测服务方面非常有效。众包干预措施可能是在中低收入国家(LMIC)扩大 MSM 的 HIV 检测服务的重要工具。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02796963。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/5971985c5dcc/pmed.1002645.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/85f0a9fc8192/pmed.1002645.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/96f798f080e6/pmed.1002645.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/78075c202381/pmed.1002645.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/5971985c5dcc/pmed.1002645.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/85f0a9fc8192/pmed.1002645.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/96f798f080e6/pmed.1002645.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/78075c202381/pmed.1002645.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe9/6112627/5971985c5dcc/pmed.1002645.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Crowdsourcing to expand HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: A closed cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.众包拓展中国男男性行为人群中 HIV 检测:一项封闭队列递进式楔形集群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2018 Aug 28;15(8):e1002645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002645. eCollection 2018 Aug.
2
Crowdsourcing to promote HIV testing among MSM in China: study protocol for a stepped wedge randomized controlled trial.众包促进中国男男性行为者的艾滋病毒检测:一项阶梯式楔形随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 2;18(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2183-1.
3
Digital crowdsourced intervention to promote HIV testing among MSM in China: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.在中国男男性行为者中促进艾滋病毒检测的数字众包干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2020 Nov 17;21(1):931. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04860-8.
4
Digital, Crowdsourced, Multilevel Intervention to Promote HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.数字化、众包、多层次干预措施促进男男性行为者的 HIV 检测:集群随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e46890. doi: 10.2196/46890.
5
Promoting routine syphilis screening among men who have sex with men in China: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of syphilis self-testing and lottery incentive.在中国男男性行为者中推广常规梅毒筛查:梅毒自检和彩票激励的随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05188-z.
6
Comparing the effectiveness of a crowdsourced video and a social marketing video in promoting condom use among Chinese men who have sex with men: a study protocol.比较众包视频和社会营销视频在促进中国男男性行为者使用避孕套方面的效果:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 3;6(10):e010755. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010755.
7
A crowdsourced intervention to promote hepatitis B and C testing among men who have sex with men in China: study protocol for a nationwide online randomized controlled trial.一项针对中国男男性行为人群的乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎检测的众包干预研究:一项全国性在线随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 29;18(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3403-3.
8
Expanding syphilis test uptake using rapid dual self-testing for syphilis and HIV among men who have sex with men in China: A multiarm randomized controlled trial.在中国男男性行为者中使用梅毒和 HIV 快速双联自我检测扩大梅毒检测:一项多臂随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2022 Mar 2;19(3):e1003930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003930. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Crowdsourcing HIV Test Promotion Videos: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial in China.众包艾滋病检测宣传视频:中国的一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 1;62(11):1436-1442. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw171. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
10
Reimagining Health Communication: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial of Crowdsourced Intervention in China.重新构想健康传播:中国众包干预的非劣效随机对照试验。
Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Mar;46(3):172-178. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000930.

引用本文的文献

1
Community engagement and chronic viral hepatitis public health interventions: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and complementary crowdsourcing open call.社区参与与慢性病毒性肝炎公共卫生干预措施:一项系统评价、荟萃分析及补充众包公开征集
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 2;83:103234. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103234. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Crowdsourcing strategies to improve access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Australia, the Philippines, Thailand and China.澳大利亚、菲律宾、泰国和中国提高获得艾滋病毒暴露前预防服务机会的众包策略。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 14;25(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11065-4.
3
Technology-Based HIV Prevention Interventions for Men Who Have Sex With Men: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of innovation design contests for health: spurring innovation and mass engagement.健康领域创新设计竞赛的系统评价:激发创新与大众参与
BMJ Innov. 2017;3:227-237. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2017-000203. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
2
Innovation challenge contests to enhance HIV responses.加强艾滋病应对的创新挑战竞赛。
Lancet HIV. 2018 Mar;5(3):e113-e115. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30027-4.
3
Generalisability of an online randomised controlled trial: an empirical analysis.在线随机对照试验的可推广性:一项实证分析。
针对男男性行为者的基于技术的艾滋病预防干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e63111. doi: 10.2196/63111.
4
It Is a Catch-22 Situation! A Decade of Research Trends on Gay Wellbeing in China: A Bibliometric Analysis.这是一个两难的困境!中国同性恋者福祉研究十年趋势:文献计量分析。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;15(1):99. doi: 10.3390/bs15010099.
5
Economic evaluation of short message service intervention for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men in China: a modelling study.中国男男性行为者中基于短信服务的艾滋病预防干预措施的经济学评价:一项模型研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):3553. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20857-3.
6
A rapid review of digital approaches for the participatory development of health-related interventions.对用于参与式制定健康相关干预措施的数字方法的快速综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;12:1461422. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1461422. eCollection 2024.
7
PrEP your step: Implementing an online crowdsourcing contest to engage young people in HIV prevention in Washington DC, USA.准备好参与:在美国华盛顿特区实施一项在线众包竞赛,让年轻人参与艾滋病预防。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0313882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313882. eCollection 2024.
8
User Views on Online Sexual Health Symptom Checker Tool: Qualitative Research.用户对在线性健康症状检查工具的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 4;8:e54565. doi: 10.2196/54565.
9
Data science research in sub-Saharan Africa: Ethical considerations in crowdsourcing for community engagement.撒哈拉以南非洲的数据科学研究:众包促进社区参与中的伦理考量。
S Afr J Sci. 2023 May-Jun;119(5-6). doi: 10.17159/sajs.2023/14911. Epub 2023 May 30.
10
A citizen science approach to develop a digital intervention to reduce HIV stigma and promote HIV self-testing among adolescents and young adults: a mixed methods analysis from Kazakhstan.公民科学方法开发数字干预措施,以减少青少年和青年群体中的艾滋病污名化并促进艾滋病自我检测:来自哈萨克斯坦的混合方法分析。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Jul;27 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e26314. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26314.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Feb;72(2):173-178. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209976. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
4
Social Media Interventions to Promote HIV Testing, Linkage, Adherence, and Retention: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.促进艾滋病毒检测、转介、依从性和留存率的社交媒体干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 24;19(11):e394. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7997.
5
The HepTestContest: a global innovation contest to identify approaches to hepatitis B and C testing.肝炎检测竞赛:一项旨在确定乙肝和丙肝检测方法的全球创新竞赛。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 1;17(Suppl 1):701. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2771-4.
6
Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study.在中心数量较少的多中心研究中估计相对风险——应使用哪些方法?一项模拟研究。
Trials. 2017 Nov 2;18(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2248-1.
7
Crowdsourcing to promote HIV testing among MSM in China: study protocol for a stepped wedge randomized controlled trial.众包促进中国男男性行为者的艾滋病毒检测:一项阶梯式楔形随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 2;18(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2183-1.
8
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Efficacy of Promoting a Home-Based HIV Self-Testing with Online Counseling on Increasing HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex with Men.一项评价基于家庭的 HIV 自我检测并结合在线咨询对男男性行为者中 HIV 检测促进效果的随机对照试验
AIDS Behav. 2018 Jan;22(1):190-201. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1887-2.
9
Uptake of HIV Self-testing among Men Who have Sex with Men in Beijing, China: a Cross-sectional Study.中国北京男男性行为者中艾滋病病毒自我检测的接受情况:一项横断面研究
Biomed Environ Sci. 2017 Jun;30(6):407-417. doi: 10.3967/bes2017.054.
10
Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与标准HIV检测服务相比,研究HIV自我检测的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 May 15;20(1):21594. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594.