• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对男男性行为者的基于技术的艾滋病预防干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Technology-Based HIV Prevention Interventions for Men Who Have Sex With Men: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Huang Wenting, Stegmueller Daniel, Ong Jason J, Wirtz Susan Schlueter, Ning Kunru, Wang Yuqing, Mi Guodong, Yu Fei, Hong Chenglin, Sales Jessica M, Liu Yufen, Baral Stefan D, Sullivan Patrick S, Siegler Aaron J

机构信息

Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e63111. doi: 10.2196/63111.

DOI:10.2196/63111
PMID:40293786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12070019/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There remain unmet HIV prevention needs in China, particularly among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Technology-based interventions are increasingly used in HIV prevention worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to assess the effectiveness of technology-based HIV prevention interventions to improve HIV testing and consistent condom use in China.

METHODS

We searched English-language (PubMed and MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) and Chinese-language (Wanfang, WEIPU, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) databases for technology-based HIV prevention intervention studies published between January 1, 2004, and September 30, 2021. Eligible studies were technology-based HIV prevention intervention studies with outcomes of HIV testing or condom use among men who have sex with men or transgender women using randomized controlled or nonrandomized pretest-posttest designs in China. The intervention technologies identified were apps, web pages, and other types of electronic communications (eg, email, SMS text messages, and video messages). A Bayesian meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled effect size and 95% credible interval (CrI). We added study and intervention features as covariates to explore their associations with the study effects. Study quality was assessed using the integrated quality criteria for review of multiple study designs. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and robust Bayesian meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 1214 and 1691 records from English-language and Chinese-language databases, respectively. A total of 141 records entered full-text screening, and 24 (17%) studies were eligible for the review. Approximately half (14/24, 58%) of the interventions were delivered through social media platforms, predominantly using message-based communication. The remaining studies used email and web-based platforms. The pooled effect sizes estimated were an absolute increase of 20% (95% CrI 10%-30%) in HIV testing uptake and an absolute increase of 15% (95% CrI 5%-26%) in consistent condom use. The pooled point estimate of the effect of randomized controlled trials was smaller than that of nonrandomized studies for HIV testing uptake (16% vs 23%) and consistent condom use (10% vs 19%), but their CrIs largely overlapped. Interventions lasting >6 months were associated with a 35% greater uptake of HIV testing (95% CrI 19%-51%) compared to those lasting 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Technology-based HIV prevention interventions are promising strategies to improve HIV testing uptake and consistent condom use among men who have sex with men in China, with significant effects found across a broad array of studies and study designs. However, many studies in this review did not include randomized designs or a control group. More rigorous study designs, such as randomized controlled trials, are needed, with outcome measurements that address the limitation of self-report outcomes to inform the development and implementation of future intervention programs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021270856; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021270856.

摘要

背景

中国仍存在未满足的艾滋病预防需求,尤其是在男同性恋者、双性恋者以及其他与男性发生性行为的男性群体中。基于技术的干预措施在全球艾滋病预防工作中越来越多地被使用。

目的

我们旨在对相关研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估基于技术的艾滋病预防干预措施在中国提高艾滋病检测率和持续使用避孕套方面的有效性。

方法

我们检索了英文数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science)以及中文数据库(万方、维普和中国知网),查找2004年1月1日至2021年9月30日期间发表的基于技术的艾滋病预防干预研究。符合条件的研究是在中国针对男同性恋者或跨性别女性开展的、以艾滋病检测或避孕套使用为结局指标、采用随机对照或非随机前后测设计的基于技术的艾滋病预防干预研究。所确定的干预技术包括应用程序、网页以及其他类型的电子通信方式(如电子邮件、短信和视频信息)。进行贝叶斯荟萃分析以估计合并效应量和95%可信区间(CrI)。我们将研究和干预特征作为协变量纳入,以探讨它们与研究效应之间的关联。使用多种研究设计的综合质量标准评估研究质量。使用漏斗图和稳健贝叶斯荟萃分析评估发表偏倚。

结果

我们分别从英文和中文数据库中识别出1214条和1691条记录。共有141条记录进入全文筛选阶段,24项(17%)研究符合纳入综述的条件。大约一半(14/24,58%)的干预措施是通过社交媒体平台实施的,主要采用基于信息的通信方式。其余研究使用电子邮件和基于网络的平台。估计的合并效应量为艾滋病检测率绝对提高20%(95% CrI 10%-30%),持续使用避孕套的比例绝对提高15%(95% CrI 5%-26%)。对于艾滋病检测率(16%对23%)和持续使用避孕套(10%对19%),随机对照试验的合并点估计值小于非随机研究,但它们的可信区间有很大重叠。与持续6个月的干预措施相比,持续时间超过6个月的干预措施使艾滋病检测率提高了35%(95% CrI 19%-51%)。

结论

基于技术的艾滋病预防干预措施是提高中国男同性恋者艾滋病检测率和持续使用避孕套的有前景的策略,在广泛的研究和研究设计中均发现了显著效果。然而,本综述中的许多研究未包括随机设计或对照组。需要更严格的研究设计,如随机对照试验,并采用能够解决自我报告结局局限性的结局测量方法,以为未来干预项目的开发和实施提供参考。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42021270856;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021270856

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/96f68b7d22c3/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/19279312d37b/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/d31321480658/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/60f782c45e47/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/c9c80813fbef/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/96f68b7d22c3/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/19279312d37b/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/d31321480658/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/60f782c45e47/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/c9c80813fbef/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ec/12070019/96f68b7d22c3/jmir_v27i1e63111_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Technology-Based HIV Prevention Interventions for Men Who Have Sex With Men: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对男男性行为者的基于技术的艾滋病预防干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e63111. doi: 10.2196/63111.
2
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
3
Social marketing interventions to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among men who have sex with men and male-to-female transgender women.旨在提高男男性行为者和男变女跨性别女性中艾滋病毒/性传播感染检测率的社会营销干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD009337. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009337.
4
Behavioral interventions for improving condom use for dual protection.改善避孕套使用以实现双重保护的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 26;2013(10):CD010662. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010662.pub2.
5
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV.改善感染艾滋病毒妇女避孕措施使用情况的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD010243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010243.pub2.
6
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.与随机试验中评估的医疗保健结果相比,观察性研究设计评估的医疗保健结果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Weekly Text Messages to Support Adherence to Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Cisgender Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) and Transgender Women: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Nested in PrEP Brasil Study.通过每周发送短信支持男同性恋者、双性恋者以及其他与男性发生性关系的顺性别男性(MSM)和跨性别女性坚持口服暴露前预防药物(PrEP):嵌套于巴西PrEP研究中的试点随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 18;27:e72360. doi: 10.2196/72360.
9
School-based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents.以学校为基础的干预措施,用于提高青少年的避孕措施使用率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 29;2016(6):CD012249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012249.
10
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Using HIV Risk Self-Assessment Tools to Increase HIV Testing in Men Who Have Sex With Men in Beijing, China: App-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.利用 HIV 风险自评工具提高中国北京男男性行为人群 HIV 检测率:基于 APP 的随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 1;25:e45262. doi: 10.2196/45262.
2
Evaluating an Innovative HIV Self-Testing Service With Web-Based, Real-Time Counseling Provided by an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot (HIVST-Chatbot) in Increasing HIV Self-Testing Use Among Chinese Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for a Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.评估一种创新的艾滋病毒自我检测服务,该服务通过人工智能聊天机器人提供基于网络的实时咨询(HIVST-聊天机器人),以提高中国男男性行为者的艾滋病毒自我检测使用率:一项非劣效性随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 30;12:e48447. doi: 10.2196/48447.
3
Effectiveness of the secondary distribution of HIV self-testing with and without monetary incentives among men who have sex with men living with HIV in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.HIV 自我检测二次分发在 HIV 感染者中的有效性研究:一项针对男男性行为者的随机对照试验研究方案
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08062-w.
4
Interpreting results from randomized controlled trials: What measures to focus on in clinical practice.解读随机对照试验的结果:临床实践中应关注哪些指标。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Oct;37(15):3055-3058. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02454-7. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
5
Digital approaches to enhancing community engagement in clinical trials.增强社区参与临床试验的数字化方法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Mar 25;5(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00581-1.
6
HIV incidence and risk factors among transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men in two cities of China: a prospective cohort study.中国两个城市的跨性别女性和与男性发生性关系的顺性别男性中的 HIV 发病率和危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Mar 7;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-00947-3.
7
Increasing the HIV testing among MSM through HIV test result exchange mechanism: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.通过 HIV 检测结果交换机制增加男男性行为者中的 HIV 检测:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06484-y.
8
Mobile Phone Intervention Based on an HIV Risk Prediction Tool for HIV Prevention Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于 HIV 风险预测工具的手机干预在我国男男性行为人群 HIV 预防中的应用:随机对照试验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 13;9(4):e19511. doi: 10.2196/19511.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Use of Geosocial Networking Apps and HIV Risk Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Case-Crossover Study.使用基于地理位置的社交网络应用与男男性行为者的 HIV 风险行为:病例交叉研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 15;7(1):e17173. doi: 10.2196/17173.