• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于磁共振成像的 3D 头影测量分析:准确性和可重复性验证。

3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility.

机构信息

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Division of Experimental Radiology, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 29;8(1):13029. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31384-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-31384-8
PMID:30158656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6115428/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. For accuracy validation, 96 angular and 96 linear measurements were taken on a phantom in 3 different positions. In vivo MRI scans were performed on 3 volunteers in five head positions. For each in vivo scan, 27 landmarks were determined from which 19 angles and 26 distances were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Bland-Altman analysis, the two one-sided tests procedure and repeated measures one-way analysis of variance. In comparison to ground truth, all MRI-based phantom measurements showed statistical equivalence (p < 0.001) and an excellent agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (bias ranges: -0.090-0.044°, -0.220-0.241 mm). In vivo cephalometric analysis was highly reproducible among the five different head positions in all study participants, without statistical differences for all angles and distances (p > 0.05). Ranges between maximum and minimum in vivo values were consistently smaller than 2° and 2 mm, respectively (average ranges: 0.88°/0.87 mm). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that accurate and reproducible 3D cephalometric analysis can be performed without exposure to ionizing radiation using MRI.

摘要

本研究旨在验证基于标志点的头影测量在 3T 高分辨率 3D 磁共振成像(MRI)中的几何精度和体内可重复性。为了进行准确性验证,在 3 个不同位置的 96 个角测量和 96 个线测量中进行了 96 个角测量和 96 个线测量。在 3 名志愿者的 5 个头位进行了体内 MRI 扫描。对于每个体内扫描,从 27 个标志点确定了 19 个角度和 26 个距离。使用 Bland-Altman 分析、双单边检验程序和重复测量单向方差分析进行统计分析。与真实值相比,所有基于 MRI 的体模测量均显示出统计学等效性(p<0.001),Bland-Altman 分析也具有极好的一致性(偏差范围:-0.090-0.044°,-0.220-0.241 mm)。在所有研究参与者的 5 个不同头位中,体内头影测量分析具有高度可重复性,所有角度和距离均无统计学差异(p>0.05)。体内测量的最大和最小范围始终小于 2°和 2 mm(平均范围:0.88°/0.87 mm)。总之,本研究表明,使用 MRI 可以在不暴露于电离辐射的情况下进行准确且可重复的 3D 头影测量分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc6/6115428/f8582f2d0e89/41598_2018_31384_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc6/6115428/4dfbb7ca77b7/41598_2018_31384_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc6/6115428/0ff9a10bfd18/41598_2018_31384_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc6/6115428/96f8b577b11d/41598_2018_31384_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc6/6115428/f8582f2d0e89/41598_2018_31384_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc6/6115428/4dfbb7ca77b7/41598_2018_31384_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc6/6115428/0ff9a10bfd18/41598_2018_31384_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc6/6115428/96f8b577b11d/41598_2018_31384_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc6/6115428/f8582f2d0e89/41598_2018_31384_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility.基于磁共振成像的 3D 头影测量分析:准确性和可重复性验证。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 29;8(1):13029. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31384-8.
2
In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?基于 MRI 和 CBCT 的三维头影测量分析的体内比较:颅颌面成像的无电离诊断时代开始了?
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1488-1497. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06540-x. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents.基于MRI与X线片的正畸治疗计划侧位头影测量分析:儿童和青少年的可行性研究
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 23;12(3):e0174524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174524. eCollection 2017.
4
Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.3T-MRI 与 CBCT 三维头影测量分析的比较:成人初步研究。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Oct 21;20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0293-x.
5
In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.磁共振成像中三维头影测量标志点确定的体内可靠性:一项可行性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1339-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03015-7. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
6
Cephalometry without complex dedicated postprocessing in an oriented magnetic resonance imaging dataset: a pilot study.在有方向磁共振成像数据集里无需复杂专用后处理的头影测量:初步研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2021 Dec 1;43(6):614-621. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa066.
7
Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.基于自动知识型地标检测算法的三维头影测量的准确性。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Jul;11(7):1297-309. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1334-7. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
8
Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements.增加头影测量分析的深度:二维和三维角度头影测量的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jul;30(5):1568-1571. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005555.
9
Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements.评估下颌升支和髁突的长度:口腔全景片、锥形束计算机断层扫描、计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和头颅侧位测量的比较
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Feb;37(1):13-21. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju008. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
10
Ultra short time to Echo (UTE) MRI for cephalometric analysis-Potential of an x-ray free fast cephalometric projection technique.用于头影测量分析的超短回波时间(UTE)MRI-一种无射线的快速头影测量投影技术的潜力。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 13;16(9):e0257224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257224. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of craniofacial landmark plotting on magnetic resonance images.在磁共振图像上绘制颅面标志点的可行性
Odontology. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01077-6.
2
Can MRI be a potential substitute for CT in cephalometric analysis for radiation-free diagnoses?在头影测量分析中,磁共振成像(MRI)能否成为计算机断层扫描(CT)的潜在替代品,用于无辐射诊断?
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00576-z.
3
Dental MRI-only a future vision or standard of care? A literature review on current indications and applications of MRI in dentistry.

本文引用的文献

1
Pediatric cleft palate patients show a 3- to 5-fold increase in cumulative radiation exposure from dental radiology compared with an age- and gender-matched population: a retrospective cohort study.儿科腭裂患者的牙科放射影像学累积辐射暴露量较年龄和性别匹配的人群高 3 至 5 倍:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 May;22(4):1783-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2274-0. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
2
PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging.PETRA、MSVAT-SPACE 和 SEMAC 序列在口腔磁共振成像中减少金属伪影。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Dec;27(12):5104-5112. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4901-1. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
3
牙科磁共振成像——仅是未来愿景还是常规护理标准?对牙科磁共振成像当前适应证和应用的文献综述。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Apr;52(4):20220333. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20220333. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
4
MRI-based cephalometrics: a scoping review of current insights and future perspectives.基于 MRI 的头影测量学:当前见解和未来展望的范围综述。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Jul;52(5):20230024. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230024. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
5
SEMAC + VAT for Suppression of Artifacts Induced by Dental-Implant-Supported Restorations in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.用于抑制磁共振成像中牙种植体支持修复体所致伪影的SEMAC+VAT
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 31;12(3):1117. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031117.
6
Diagnostic compatibility of various fixed orthodontic retainers for head/neck MRI and dental MRI.各种头/颈部 MRI 和牙科 MRI 用固定正畸保持器的诊断兼容性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2375-2384. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04861-2. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
7
Retrospective investigation of the 3D effects of the Carriere Motion 3D appliance using model and cephalometric superimposition.采用模型和头影测量叠加以研究 Carriere Motion 3D 矫治器的三维效果:回顾性研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Feb;27(2):631-643. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04768-4. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
8
Simulation of Velopharyngeal Biomechanics Identifies Differences in Sphincter Pharyngoplasty Outcomes: A Matched Case-Control Study.模拟咽腔生物力学可识别悬雍垂咽成形术治疗结果的差异:一项配对病例对照研究。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Feb;61(2):339-349. doi: 10.1177/10556656221122634. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
9
Imaging of Bone in the Head and Neck Region, is There More Than CT?头颈部区域骨骼的影像学检查,CT之外还有更多吗?
Curr Radiol Rep. 2022;10(6):69-82. doi: 10.1007/s40134-022-00396-8. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
10
The intraoral permeability measurement as a screening for artifact formation by orthodontic products in MRI.口腔内通透性测量作为磁共振成像中正畸产品伪影形成的筛选方法。
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Jul;84(4):252-263. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00360-9. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents.
基于MRI与X线片的正畸治疗计划侧位头影测量分析:儿童和青少年的可行性研究
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 23;12(3):e0174524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174524. eCollection 2017.
4
"Black Bone" MRI: a novel imaging technique for 3D printing.“黑骨”磁共振成像:一种用于3D打印的新型成像技术。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Mar;46(3):20160407. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160407. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
5
Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry.基于统计形状分析确定用于评估面部不对称的最佳正中矢状参考平面。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Aug;150(2):252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.01.017.
6
MRI vs. CT for orthodontic applications: comparison of two MRI protocols and three CT (multislice, cone-beam, industrial) technologies.正畸应用中MRI与CT的比较:两种MRI方案与三种CT(多层螺旋、锥形束、工业用)技术的对比
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):251-61. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0028-2. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Dental MRI using a dedicated RF-coil at 3 Tesla.在3特斯拉磁场下使用专用射频线圈进行牙科磁共振成像。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;43(10):2175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
8
Optimized 14 + 1 receive coil array and position system for 3D high-resolution MRI of dental and maxillomandibular structures.用于牙齿和颌面部结构三维高分辨率磁共振成像的优化14 + 1接收线圈阵列及定位系统
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(1):20150177. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150177. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use.正畸中的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT):治疗效果评估及其应用指征
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140282. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140282.
10
Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements.评估下颌升支和髁突的长度:口腔全景片、锥形束计算机断层扫描、计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和头颅侧位测量的比较
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Feb;37(1):13-21. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju008. Epub 2014 Aug 25.