Suppr超能文献

三种评估方式评估保乳手术后的美学效果与健康相关生活质量的关系。

Aesthetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery assessed by three evaluation modalities in relation to health-related quality of life.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(1):90-99. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10963. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between three different methods for evaluation of aesthetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy: a patient questionnaire, panel evaluation of photographs and the software BCCT.core. A further aim was to examine how these modalities predict health-related quality of life as measured by the validated Breast-Q™ questionnaire.

METHODS

At 1-year follow-up after breast-conserving surgery, patients completed a study-specific questionnaire. Postoperative photographs were evaluated using the software BCCT.core. A panel of three healthcare professionals assessed preoperative and postoperative photographs. Agreement between methods was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficients (r ). The Breast-Q™ questionnaire was sent to study participants. The ability of the different evaluation methods to predict Q-scores for the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) domains satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being was investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

A total of 532 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery were examined before surgery. At 1-year follow-up, 334 patients completed the study-specific questionnaire. Postoperative photographs from 310 patients were evaluated using BCCT.core. The panel of healthcare professionals assessed photographs from 215 patients. Agreement between the different evaluation modalities was poor. The strongest agreement was noted between the panel evaluation for symmetry and BCCT.core results (r  = 0·59, P < 0·001). The Breast-Q™ questionnaire was returned by 348 patients. Patient satisfaction ratings at 1-year follow-up best predicted long-term HRQoL measured using the Breast-Q score, both in terms of satisfaction with breasts (area under the curve (AUC) 0·80, P < 0·001) and psychosocial well-being (AUC 0·73, P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

There is currently no ideal method for evaluating aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. These results emphasize the use of patient-related outcome measures.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较三种不同方法评估保乳手术后辅助放疗后美容效果的一致性:患者问卷调查、照片专家组评估和 BCCT.core 软件。进一步的目的是研究这些方法如何预测通过经过验证的 Breast-Q™ 问卷测量的健康相关生活质量。

方法

保乳手术后 1 年随访时,患者完成了特定于研究的问卷。使用 BCCT.core 软件评估术后照片。由三名医疗保健专业人员组成的专家组评估术前和术后照片。使用 Spearman 相关系数(r)评估方法之间的一致性。向研究参与者发送了 Breast-Q™ 问卷。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线研究不同评估方法预测健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)领域满意度和心理社会幸福感的 Q 评分的能力。

结果

共有 532 名接受保乳手术的患者在手术前接受了检查。在 1 年随访时,334 名患者完成了特定于研究的问卷。对 310 名患者的术后照片使用 BCCT.core 进行了评估。专家组评估了 215 名患者的照片。不同评估方法之间的一致性较差。专家组评估的对称性与 BCCT.core 结果之间的一致性最强(r = 0.59,P < 0.001)。共有 348 名患者返回了 Breast-Q™ 问卷。1 年随访时患者的满意度评分最能预测使用 Breast-Q 评分测量的长期 HRQoL,包括对乳房的满意度(曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.80,P < 0.001)和心理社会幸福感(AUC 为 0.73,P < 0.001)。

结论

目前尚无评估保乳手术后辅助放疗后美容效果的理想方法。这些结果强调使用患者相关的结果测量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验