1 Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
2 Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Oct;211(4):W188-W197. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19306. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of in-phase and opposed-phase chemical-shift imaging (CSI) for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions (BMLs).
The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for diagnostic accuracy studies comparing conventional gradient-echo CSI or the Dixon method for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral BMLs with histopathologic or best-value comparator results. Methodologic quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Bivariate modeling and hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) modeling were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CSI. For heterogeneity exploration, we performed meta-regression analyses.
Twelve studies including 663 lesions of 591 patients were included. CSI showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.84-0.96), pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.93), and HSROC AUC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97) for differentiating benign from malignant vertebral BMLs. The corresponding values for differentiating benign from malignant compression fractures were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.81-0.99), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.93), and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95). In meta-regression analysis, minimum TR (< 100 ms), flip angle (< 50°), and Dixon method tended to have higher specificity. Study population, slice thickness (< 5 mm), minimum TE (< 2.3 ms), flip angle (< 50°), and blinding also significantly affected heterogeneity (p < 0.05).
In-phase and opposed-phase CSI has excellent diagnostic performance for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral BMLs. CSI with a short TR, small flip angle, and Dixon method is recommended for more accurate diagnosis as specificity increases.
本研究旨在评估同相位和反相位化学位移成像(CSI)在鉴别良性和恶性椎体骨髓病变(BML)中的诊断性能。
检索 PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库,以比较常规梯度回波 CSI 或 Dixon 法鉴别良性和恶性椎体 BML 与组织病理学或最佳值比较结果的诊断准确性研究。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具 2 进行方法学质量评估。采用双变量模型和分层汇总受试者工作特征(HSROC)模型评估 CSI 的诊断性能。为了探索异质性,我们进行了 meta 回归分析。
纳入了 12 项研究,共 591 例患者的 663 个病灶。CSI 鉴别良性和恶性椎体 BML 的汇总敏感度为 0.92(95%置信区间,0.84-0.96),汇总特异度为 0.89(95%置信区间,0.81-0.93),HSROC 曲线下面积为 0.95(95%置信区间,0.93-0.97)。鉴别良性和恶性压缩性骨折的相应值分别为 0.96(95%置信区间,0.81-0.99)、0.89(95%置信区间,0.83-0.93)和 0.93(95%置信区间,0.91-0.95)。Meta 回归分析显示,最小重复时间(<100ms)、翻转角(<50°)和 Dixon 法倾向于具有更高的特异性。研究人群、层厚(<5mm)、最小回波时间(<2.3ms)、翻转角(<50°)和盲法也显著影响了异质性(p<0.05)。
同相位和反相位 CSI 对鉴别良性和恶性椎体 BML 具有出色的诊断性能。CSI 采用较短的 TR、较小的翻转角和 Dixon 法可提高特异性,有助于更准确的诊断。