Suppr超能文献

从基于卫星的远紫外线和地面电离层探测仪观测获得的极光电离层E区参数:1. 数据、方法及比较

Auroral ionospheric E region parameters obtained from satellite-based far ultraviolet and ground-based ionosonde observations: 1. Data, methods, and comparisons.

作者信息

Knight H K, Galkin I A, Reinisch B W, Zhang Y

机构信息

Computational Physics, Inc., Springfield, VA.

University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA.

出版信息

J Geophys Res Space Phys. 2018;123(7):6065-6089. doi: 10.1029/2017JA024822. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

Abstract

A large number (~1000) of coincident auroral far ultraviolet (FUV) and ground-based ionosonde observations are compared. This is the largest study to date of coincident satellite-based FUV and ground-based observations of the auroral E region. FUV radiance values from the NASA Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) Global Ultraviolet Imager (GUVI) and the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) F16 and F18 Special Sensor Ultraviolet Spectrographic Imager (SSUSI) are included in the study. A method is described for deriving auroral ionospheric E region maximum electron density (NmE) and height of maximum electron density (hmE) from N Lyman-Birge-Hopfield (LBH) radiances given in two channels using lookup tables generated with the Boltzmann 3-Constituent (B3C) auroral particle transport and optical emission model. Our rules for scaling (i.e., extracting ionospheric parameters from) ionograms to obtain auroral NmE and hmE are also described. Statistical and visual comparison methods establish statistical consistency and agreement between the two methods for observing auroral NmE, but not auroral hmE. It is expected that auroral non-uniformity will cause the two NmE methods to give inconsistent results, but we have not attempted to quantify this effect in terms of more basic principles, and our results show that the two types of NmE observations are well correlated and statistically symmetrical, meaning that there is no overall bias and no scale-dependent bias.

摘要

对大量(约1000次)同时进行的极光远紫外(FUV)和地面电离层探测观测数据进行了比较。这是迄今为止对基于卫星的FUV和基于地面的极光E区观测进行的规模最大的研究。该研究纳入了来自美国国家航空航天局热层、电离层、中间层能量学与动力学(TIMED)全球紫外成像仪(GUVI)以及国防气象卫星计划(DMSP)F16和F18特殊传感器紫外光谱成像仪(SSUSI)的FUV辐射值。描述了一种方法,利用由玻尔兹曼三成分(B3C)极光粒子输运和光发射模型生成的查找表,从两个通道给出的N莱曼 - 比尔格 - 霍普菲尔德(LBH)辐射中推导极光电离层E区最大电子密度(NmE)和最大电子密度高度(hmE)。还描述了我们对电离层图进行缩放(即从电离层图中提取电离层参数)以获得极光NmE和hmE的规则。统计和可视化比较方法确定了两种观测极光NmE方法之间的统计一致性和一致性,但对于极光hmE并非如此。预计极光的不均匀性会导致两种NmE方法给出不一致的结果,但我们尚未尝试根据更基本的原理对这种影响进行量化,并且我们的结果表明,两种类型的NmE观测具有良好的相关性且在统计上是对称的,这意味着不存在总体偏差和与尺度相关的偏差。

相似文献

4
The Thermospheric Column O/N Ratio.热层柱O/N比。
J Geophys Res Space Phys. 2021 Mar;126(3). doi: 10.1029/2020ja029059. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
10
Wide-field auroral imager onboard the Fengyun satellite.风云卫星上的宽视场极光成像仪。
Light Sci Appl. 2019 May 22;8:47. doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0157-7. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验