• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三级医疗中心内镜检查中工作人员对安全标准检查表的依从性改善情况。

Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre.

作者信息

Mason Matthew Charles, Griggs Rebecca Katie, Withecombe Rachel, Xing Eunice Yun, Sandberg Charlotte, Molyneux Matthew Keith

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Weston General Hospital, Weston-super-Mare, UK.

Department of General Surgery, Royal United Hospitals, Bath, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Aug 21;7(3):e000294. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294
PMID:30167474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6112386/
Abstract

National Health Service England published the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIP) in 2015. They mandated that individual trusts produce Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSSIPs), a set of safety standards drawn from the NatSSIP that apply to a particular clinical situation in a given department, for all invasive procedures. The project goal was to design and implement the LocSSIP within the endoscopy department. A draft LocSSIP was produced, and a pilot study conducted to gain initial feedback on its use. Version 1 of the checklist was produced and after approval, rolled out for use within the endoscopy department at 'time out' and 'sign out'. A scoring system was developed that allowed the quality of the performance of LocSSIPs to be assessed and recorded as a 'compliance score'. After 2 months, an independent observer spent a week assessing use of the checklist, recording completion and a compliance score. Analysis of this data led to a number of changes in performing the checklist, wider multidisciplinary team education and integration of the checklist into existing documentation, before reassessing at 12 months. In 2016, 'time out' checks were completed in 100% of cases, but full completion was only observed in 68%. 'Sign out' checks were completed in 91% of cases, with full completion in 71%. In 2017, 'time out' checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 85%. 'Sign out' checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 91%. The composite score for compliance in 2016 was 57% increasing to 90% in 2017. In conclusion, stronger departmental leadership, broadening education and integration of the checklist into routine documentation to reduce duplication led to significant improvements in compliance with use of the checklist. Ongoing education and assessment is imperative to ensure that compliance is maintained to ensure patient safety.

摘要

英国国家医疗服务体系于2015年发布了《侵入性操作国家安全标准》(NatSSIP)。该标准要求各信托机构制定《侵入性操作地方安全标准》(LocSSIPs),这是一套从NatSSIP中提取的安全标准,适用于特定部门特定临床情况下的所有侵入性操作。该项目的目标是在内镜科室设计并实施LocSSIP。制定了LocSSIP草案,并进行了一项试点研究以获取关于其使用的初步反馈。生成了清单的第1版,经批准后,在内镜科室的“暂停”和“签字确认”环节推出使用。开发了一个评分系统,用于评估和记录LocSSIP的执行质量,作为“合规分数”。2个月后,一名独立观察员花了一周时间评估清单的使用情况,记录完成情况和合规分数。对这些数据的分析导致在重新评估12个月之前,在执行清单、更广泛的多学科团队教育以及将清单纳入现有文档方面进行了一些更改。2016年,100%的病例完成了“暂停”检查,但只有68%观察到完全完成。91%的病例完成了“签字确认”检查,完全完成的比例为71%。2017年,100%的病例完成了“暂停”检查,完全完成的比例为85%。100%的病例完成了“签字确认”检查,完全完成的比例为91%。2016年的综合合规分数为57%,2017年增至90%。总之,更强有力的部门领导、扩大教育范围以及将清单纳入常规文档以减少重复工作,导致清单使用的合规性有了显著提高。持续的教育和评估对于确保维持合规性以保障患者安全至关重要。

相似文献

1
Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre.三级医疗中心内镜检查中工作人员对安全标准检查表的依从性改善情况。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Aug 21;7(3):e000294. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294. eCollection 2018.
2
Does a novel method of delivering the safe surgical checklist improve compliance? A closed loop audit.新的安全手术检查表传递方法是否能提高依从性?闭环审核。
Int J Surg. 2016 Aug;32:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.035. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
3
Achieving flying colours in surgical safety: audit of World Health Organization 'Surgical Safety Checklist' compliance.在手术安全方面取得优异成绩:对世界卫生组织《手术安全核对表》合规情况的审计
J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Oct;126(10):1049-55. doi: 10.1017/S002221511200165X. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
4
Writing's on the wall: improving the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.书写在墙上:改进世界卫生组织手术安全检查表。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001086.
5
Improving patient safety in the endoscopy unit: utilization of remote video auditing to improve time-out compliance.提高内镜诊疗室的患者安全性:利用远程视频审核提高手术暂停合规性。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):424-429. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.237. Epub 2019 May 2.
6
A 'paperless' wall-mounted surgical safety checklist with migrated leadership can improve compliance and team engagement.一个具有迁移式领导力的“无纸化”壁挂式手术安全检查表可以提高合规性和团队参与度。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):971-976. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004545. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
7
How to create local safety standards for invasive procedures (LocSSIPs) by engaging the team in patient safety.如何通过让团队参与患者安全来制定侵入性操作的本地安全标准(LocSSIPs)。
Br Dent J. 2019 Jan 18. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.51.
8
Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in an Ethiopian Referral Hospital.在埃塞俄比亚一家转诊医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表
Patient Saf Surg. 2014 Mar 28;8:16. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-8-16. eCollection 2014.
9
The endoscopy safety checklist: A longitudinal study of factors affecting compliance in a tertiary referral centre within the United Kingdom.内镜检查安全检查表:英国一家三级转诊中心影响依从性因素的纵向研究。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Feb 11;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206344.w2567. eCollection 2015.
10
AVOIDable medical errors in invasive procedures: Facts on the ground - An NHS staff survey.避免侵入性操作中的可避免医疗错误:基于事实 - 一项 NHS 员工调查。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2023;34(3):189-206. doi: 10.3233/JRS-220055.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing and Improving the Documentation of Large-Volume Paracentesis Procedures in a Tertiary Hospital: A Quality Improvement Project.评估并改善三级医院大量腹腔穿刺术的记录:一项质量改进项目。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 29;16(11):e74796. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74796. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Implementation of a Customized Safety Checklist in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the Importance of Team Time Out-A Dual-Center Pilot Study.实施胃肠道内镜检查中的定制安全检查表以及团队时间暂停的重要性:一项双中心试点研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 16;59(6):1160. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061160.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy.一项关于胃肠内镜检查中患者安全事件的前瞻性研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Jan;5(1):E83-E89. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-117219. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
2
Implementation of an endoscopy safety checklist.实施内镜检查安全检查表。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct;5(4):260-265. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100393. Epub 2013 Dec 19.