The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Diabetologia. 2019 Jan;62(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4722-z. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Beta cell function in type 1 diabetes is commonly assessed as the average plasma C-peptide concentration over 2 h following a mixed-meal test (CP). Monitoring of disease progression and response to disease-modifying therapy would benefit from a simpler, more convenient and less costly measure. Therefore, we determined whether CP could be reliably estimated from routine clinical variables.
Clinical and fasting biochemical data from eight randomised therapy trials involving participants with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes were used to develop and validate linear models to estimate CP and to test their accuracy in estimating loss of beta cell function and response to immune therapy.
A model based on disease duration, BMI, insulin dose, HbA, fasting plasma C-peptide and fasting plasma glucose most accurately estimated loss of beta cell function (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.89 [95% CI 0.87, 0.92]) and was superior to the commonly used insulin-dose-adjusted HbA (IDAA1c) measure (AUROC 0.72 [95% CI 0.68, 0.76]). Model-estimated CP (CP) reliably identified treatment effects in randomised trials. CP, compared with CP, required only a modest (up to 17%) increase in sample size for equivalent statistical power.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: CP, approximated from six variables at a single time point, accurately identifies loss of beta cell function in type 1 diabetes and is comparable to CP for identifying treatment effects. CP could serve as a convenient and economical measure of beta cell function in the clinic and as a primary outcome measure in trials of disease-modifying therapy in type 1 diabetes.
目的/假设:1 型糖尿病患者的β细胞功能通常通过混合餐试验(CP)后 2 小时内的平均血浆 C 肽浓度来评估。监测疾病进展和对疾病修饰治疗的反应将受益于更简单、更方便和更经济的方法。因此,我们确定 CP 是否可以从常规临床变量中可靠地估计。
使用来自八项随机治疗试验的临床和空腹生化数据,开发和验证线性模型来估计 CP,并测试其在估计β细胞功能丧失和对免疫治疗反应方面的准确性。
基于疾病持续时间、BMI、胰岛素剂量、HbA、空腹血浆 C 肽和空腹血糖的模型最准确地估计了β细胞功能丧失(受试者工作特征曲线下面积 [AUROC] 0.89 [95%CI 0.87, 0.92]),优于常用的胰岛素剂量调整 HbA(IDAA1c)测量(AUROC 0.72 [95%CI 0.68, 0.76])。模型估计的 CP(CP)可靠地确定了随机试验中的治疗效果。与 CP 相比,CP 仅需要适度(最多增加 17%)增加样本量,以获得等效的统计效力。
结论/解释:CP,通过单点的六个变量近似,可以准确识别 1 型糖尿病中β细胞功能的丧失,并且与 CP 相比,CP 可以识别治疗效果。CP 可以作为临床中β细胞功能的方便和经济的测量方法,以及 1 型糖尿病疾病修饰治疗试验的主要结局测量方法。