• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我刺激中的曲线偏移范式。

The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation.

作者信息

Miliaressis E, Rompre P P, Laviolette P, Philippe L, Coulombe D

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 1986;37(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90388-4.

DOI:10.1016/0031-9384(86)90388-4
PMID:3016774
Abstract

Eleven rats were trained to press a lever in an operant chamber in order to earn rewarding trains of cathodal rectangular pulses of fixed intensity and variable frequency. The rate-frequency functions were examined under administration of two neuroleptics (pimozide and chlorpromazine) and three manipulations that interfered with bar pressing (muscular relaxation with methocarbamol, increased lever weight, and limitation of maximum response rates by an F1 reinforcement schedule). Chlorpromazine, and pimozide at low dosages produced a near parallel shift of the rate-frequency functions on the logarithmic axis of pulses, suggesting that these drugs decreased the reinforcing efficacy of the stimulation. The three conditions that interfered with bar-pressing decreased the asymptotic rates and produced small or moderate lateral shifts. Changes in the reinforcing efficacy of the stimulation following the above manipulations were inferred from the shift in the number of pulses required at zero and half-maximal performance (theta 0 and M50 indices, respectively). In the cases of the manipulations that interfered with bar-pressing, M50 indicated a larger artifactual change in the efficacy of the stimulation, compared to theta 0. This phenomenon was mainly due to the fact that the asymptote of the altered functions was shifted towards higher pulse numbers.

摘要

训练了11只大鼠在操作性条件反射箱中按压杠杆,以获得固定强度和可变频率的阴极矩形脉冲奖励序列。在给予两种抗精神病药物(匹莫齐特和氯丙嗪)以及三种干扰杠杆按压的操作(用美索巴莫进行肌肉松弛、增加杠杆重量以及通过F1强化程序限制最大反应率)的情况下,检查了频率函数。氯丙嗪和低剂量的匹莫齐特在脉冲对数轴上使频率函数产生近乎平行的移动,表明这些药物降低了刺激的强化效力。三种干扰杠杆按压的条件降低了渐近速率,并产生了小或中等程度的横向移动。通过零性能和半最大性能时所需脉冲数的变化(分别为θ0和M50指数)推断上述操作后刺激强化效力的变化。在干扰杠杆按压的操作中,与θ0相比,M50表明刺激效力的人为变化更大。这种现象主要是由于改变后的函数渐近线向更高的脉冲数移动。

相似文献

1
The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation.自我刺激中的曲线偏移范式。
Physiol Behav. 1986;37(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90388-4.
2
The effects of pimozide on the reinforcing efficacy of central grey stimulation in the rat.匹莫齐特对大鼠中脑导水管周围灰质刺激强化效应的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 1986 Aug;21(2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(86)90087-2.
3
Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.氯丙嗪和匹莫齐特会改变强化效能和运动表现。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986;88(3):346-53. doi: 10.1007/BF00180837.
4
Reward summation and the effects of pimozide, clonidine, and amphetamine on fixed-interval responding for brain stimulation.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992 Aug;42(4):563-77. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90001-v.
5
Interactions between amygdaloid and hypothalamic self-stimulation: a re-examination.
Behav Brain Res. 1991 Aug 29;44(2):169-83. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80022-1.
6
Automating the generation and collection of rate-frequency functions in a curve-shift brain stimulation reward paradigm.在曲线移位脑刺激奖励范式中实现速率-频率函数生成与收集的自动化。
J Neurosci Methods. 1994 Aug;53(2):163-72. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90174-0.
7
Main effects of current and pimozide on prepared and learned self-stimulation behaviors are on performance not reward.电流和匹莫齐特对已准备好的和习得的自我刺激行为的主要影响在于行为表现而非奖励。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988 Dec;31(4):845-53. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90394-2.
8
Relative effectiveness of pimozide, haloperidol and trifluoperazine on self-stimulation rate-intensity functions.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1985 Nov;23(5):777-80. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(85)90071-1.
9
Effects of peripheral and central dopamine blockade on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation: evidence for both reward and motor deficits.外周和中枢多巴胺阻断对下丘脑外侧自我刺激的影响:奖赏和运动缺陷的证据。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1983 Mar;18(3):433-42. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(83)90466-5.
10
A comparison between lick or lever-pressing contingent reward and the effects of neuroleptics thereon.舔舐或按压杠杆的偶然奖励之间的比较及其对神经阻滞剂的影响。
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1979 Jun;239(2):230-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Dorsal raphe stimulation relays a reward signal to the ventral tegmental area via GluN2C NMDA receptors.背缝核刺激通过 GluN2C NMDA 受体将奖励信号传递到腹侧被盖区。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 6;18(11):e0293564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293564. eCollection 2023.
2
Editorial: Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Reward: Theoretical and Technical Perspectives and Their Implications for Psychopathology.社论:奖励的神经行为机制:理论与技术视角及其对精神病理学的影响
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jul 5;16:967922. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.967922. eCollection 2022.
3
The Convergence Model of Brain Reward Circuitry: Implications for Relief of Treatment-Resistant Depression by Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle.
脑奖赏回路的汇聚模型:对通过内侧前脑束深部脑刺激缓解难治性抑郁症的启示。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Apr 1;16:851067. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.851067. eCollection 2022.
4
On the Similarity Between the Reinforcing and the Discriminative Properties of Intracranial Self-Stimulation.论颅内自我刺激的强化特性与辨别特性之间的相似性
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 21;16:799015. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.799015. eCollection 2022.
5
Intracranial self-stimulation and concomitant behaviors following systemic methamphetamine administration in Hnrnph1 mutant mice.在 Hnrnph1 突变小鼠中,全身给予 methamphetamine 后出现的颅内自我刺激和伴随行为。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Jul;238(7):2031-2041. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05829-4. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
The kappa opioid receptor agonist U50,488H did not affect brain-stimulation reward while it elicited conditioned place aversion in mice.κ阿片受体激动剂U50,488H在引发小鼠条件性位置厌恶的同时,并未影响脑刺激奖赏。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Aug 14;13(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05227-7.
7
Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward.多巴胺神经元并不是评估和追求脑刺激奖励的最终共同途径中的一个必经阶段。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0226722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226722. eCollection 2020.
8
Central leptin signaling transmits positive valence.中枢瘦素信号传递正性情绪。
Brain Res. 2019 Dec 1;1724:146441. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146441. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
To Act or Not to Act: Endocannabinoid/Dopamine Interactions in Decision-Making.行动与否:决策过程中的内源性大麻素/多巴胺相互作用
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Dec 17;9:336. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00336. eCollection 2015.
10
Motivational Processes Underlying Substance Abuse Disorder.物质使用障碍背后的动机过程。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2016;27:473-506. doi: 10.1007/7854_2015_391.