1 York University, School of Health Policy and Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Health Serv. 2019 Jan;49(1):17-36. doi: 10.1177/0020731418795136. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
The welfare state literature on developing nations is concerned with how governmental illegitimacy and incompetency are the sources of inequality, exploitation, exclusion, and domination of significant proportions of their citizenry. These dimensions clearly contribute to the problematic health outcomes in these nations. In contrast, developed nations are assumed to grapple with less contentious issues of stratification, decommodification, and the relative role of the state, market, and family in providing economic and social security, also important pathways to health. There is an explicit assumption that governing authorities in developed nations are legitimate and competent such that their citizens are not systematically subjected to inequality, exploitation, exclusion, and domination by elites. In this article, we argue that these concepts should also be the focus of welfare state analysis in developed liberal welfare states such as Canada. Such an analysis would expose how public policy is increasingly being made in the service of powerful economic elites rather than the majority, thereby threatening health. It would also serve to identify means of responding to these developments.
发展中国家的福利国家文献关注的是政府的合法性和能力不足如何成为其公民中相当一部分人不平等、剥削、排斥和被统治的根源。这些方面显然导致了这些国家出现有问题的健康结果。相比之下,发达国家被认为面临着较不具争议性的分层问题、去商品化问题以及国家、市场和家庭在提供经济和社会安全方面的相对作用,这些也是通往健康的重要途径。人们明确假设,发达国家的管理当局是合法和有能力的,因此其公民不会受到精英阶层的不平等、剥削、排斥和统治的系统性影响。在本文中,我们认为,这些概念也应该成为加拿大等发达自由福利国家福利国家分析的重点。这种分析将揭示公共政策如何越来越多地为强大的经济精英而不是为大多数人服务,从而对健康构成威胁。它还将有助于确定应对这些发展的手段。