• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球毒品政策陷入僵局:审视 2016 年联合国大会特别会议的政治因素。

Global drug policy at an impasse: Examining the politics of the 2016 United Nations General Assembly Special Session.

机构信息

Monash University, Australia.

Monash University, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Oct;60:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.07.018
PMID:30173003
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2016 United Nations General Assembly's Special Session on the World Drug Problem (UNGASS) was a 'critical moment' in recent global drug policy history.

METHODS

This study examines the dynamics and consequences of UNGASS 2016 using documentary analysis and interviews with ten leading international drug reform experts.

RESULTS

International consensus relating to the global drug problem remains heavily fractured. This is evident from: the increasingly diverse positions adopted by Member States during the negotiation period leading up to UNGASS; conflicting agendas within and between different United Nations agencies; and the content of the UNGASS Outcome Document. Our interviews further revealed key obstacles facing the international drug policy reform community following this event.

CONCLUSION

Global governance in the sphere of drug policy has reached an impasse but this should have limited impact on the ongoing efforts of reformers to shift the debate so long as civil society actors have access to funding and opportunities to participate in key future global drug policy events.

摘要

背景

2016 年联合国大会特别会议审议世界毒品问题(UNGASS)是全球毒品政策史上的“关键时刻”。

方法

本研究使用文件分析和对十位国际毒品改革专家的访谈,考察了 2016 年 UNGASS 的动态和后果。

结果

国际社会对全球毒品问题的共识仍然严重分裂。这一点可以从以下方面看出:在 UNGASS 谈判期间,会员国采取的立场越来越多样化;不同联合国机构内部和之间存在相互冲突的议程;以及 UNGASS 成果文件的内容。我们的访谈还进一步揭示了此次活动之后,国际毒品政策改革界面临的主要障碍。

结论

毒品政策领域的全球治理已经陷入僵局,但只要民间社会行为者有机会获得资金并参与未来的关键全球毒品政策活动,这对改革者努力推动辩论的努力影响有限。

相似文献

1
Global drug policy at an impasse: Examining the politics of the 2016 United Nations General Assembly Special Session.全球毒品政策陷入僵局:审视 2016 年联合国大会特别会议的政治因素。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Oct;60:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
2
Rethinking 'flexibilities' in the international drug control system-Potential, precedents and models for reforms.重新思考国际毒品控制系统中的“灵活性”-改革的潜力、先例和模式。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Oct;60:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
UNGASS 2016: Insights from Europe on the development of global cannabis policy and the need for reform of the global drug policy regime.UNGASS 2016:来自欧洲的全球大麻政策发展见解以及对全球毒品政策制度改革的需求。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Nov;49:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.017. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
4
Transnational social movement theory and the waning war on drugs: Case studies from UNGASS 2016.跨国社会运动理论与渐弱的禁毒战争:来自 2016 年联合国大会特别会议的案例研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jan;51:148-155. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
5
International drug control system and the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) on the world drug problem: an overview.国际药物管制系统与联合国关于世界毒品问题的大会特别会议(UNGASS):概述
East Mediterr Health J. 2017 May 1;23(3):143-149. doi: 10.26719/2017.23.3.143.
6
Towards revision of the UN drug control conventions: harnessing like-mindedness.迈向《联合国毒品控制公约》修订:凝聚志同道合。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Jan;24(1):60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
7
Addressing the global tragedy of needless pain: rethinking the United Nations single convention on narcotic drugs.应对不必要痛苦这一全球悲剧:重新思考联合国《麻醉药品单一公约》
J Law Med Ethics. 2007 Winter;35(4):556-70, 511. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00180.x.
8
The global and domestic politics of health policy in emerging nations.新兴国家卫生政策的全球与国内政治
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Feb;40(1):3-11. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2854256. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
9
Security, development and human rights: normative, legal and policy challenges for the international drug control system.安全、发展与人权:国际毒品管制体系面临的规范、法律和政策挑战。
Int J Drug Policy. 2010 Mar;21(2):140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2010.01.005. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
10
Political rationale, aims, and outcomes of health-related high-level meetings and special sessions at the UN General Assembly: A policy research observational study.与健康相关的联合国大会高级别会议和特别会议的政治背景、目标和结果:一项政策研究观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 13;19(1):e1003873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003873. eCollection 2022 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
How we understand fully the supply, demand, and harm reduction in drugs policy in Vietnam?我们如何全面了解越南毒品政策中的供应、需求和减少危害?
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Nov 20;21(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01103-w.
2
Understanding Vietnam's drug policy for amphetamine-type stimulants misuse.了解越南针对苯丙胺类兴奋剂滥用的毒品政策。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 May 13;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00621-9.