ADAPT-lab, Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Department of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Massenbergstrasse 9-13, 44787 Bochum, Germany.
Addict Behav. 2019 Jan;88:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
Problematic alcohol use is associated with drinking alcohol to reduce negative mood states (negative reinforcement motive). Further, heavy drinking individuals tend to interpret ambiguous situations as alcohol-related (interpretive bias). The current experimental study aimed to examine the role of alcohol-related interpretive biases in negative-affect drinking. It was hypothesized that a single-session Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation (CBM-I) training condition (compared to a sham condition) would lead to less alcohol-related interpretations of negative affect situations, and less alcohol consumption while being in a negative mood state. The most pronounced effects were expected in individuals who drink alcohol to cope with anxiety. Moderate to heavy drinking university students (N = 134) were randomly assigned to a CBM-I or a sham condition. Interpretations were assessed during and after the training session. Drinking was assessed in a lab-based drink test and one week later using a self-report measure. With respect to alcohol-related interpretative bias, this bias was weaker in the CBM-I compared to the sham condition during the training session. This effect was not moderated by coping-anxiety motives, and did not generalize to another interpretation measure. No training effects were found on drinking behavior in the lab or on self-reported daily-level use. In sum, the CBM-I training condition was associated with lower alcohol-related interpretive bias scores during training. Generalization to another interpretation measure or to drinking behavior was not observed. Future research could explore providing multiple training sessions in order to strengthen the effects of the CBM-I training.
问题性饮酒与通过饮酒来减轻负面情绪状态(负强化动机)有关。此外,大量饮酒的个体往往会将模棱两可的情况解释为与酒精相关(解释性偏见)。本实验研究旨在探讨酒精相关解释性偏见在负性情绪饮酒中的作用。假设单次认知偏差修正解释(CBM-I)训练条件(与假条件相比)会导致对负面情绪情境的与酒精相关的解释减少,并且在处于负面情绪状态时饮酒量减少。预计在那些用酒精来应对焦虑的个体中会出现最明显的效果。中等至重度饮酒的大学生(N=134)被随机分配到 CBM-I 或假条件组。在训练期间和之后评估解释。在实验室基于饮酒的测试和一周后使用自我报告措施评估饮酒情况。关于酒精相关的解释性偏见,在训练期间,CBM-I 组的这种偏见比假条件组弱。这种效应不受应对焦虑动机的调节,也不会推广到另一种解释性测量。在实验室或自我报告的日常饮酒行为中,没有发现训练对饮酒行为的影响。总的来说,CBM-I 训练条件与训练期间较低的酒精相关解释性偏见得分相关。未观察到对另一种解释性测量或饮酒行为的推广。未来的研究可以探索提供多次训练课程,以加强 CBM-I 训练的效果。