School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;45(2):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
This study examines the effects of a single session of Cognitive Bias Modification to induce positive Interpretative bias (CBM-I) using standard or explicit instructions and an analogue of computer-administered CBT (c-CBT) program on modifying cognitive biases and social anxiety.
A sample of 76 volunteers with social anxiety attended a research site. At both pre- and post-test, participants completed two computer-administered tests of interpretative and attentional biases and a self-report measure of social anxiety. Participants in the training conditions completed a single session of either standard or explicit CBM-I positive training and a c-CBT program. Participants in the Control (no training) condition completed a CBM-I neutral task matched the active CBM-I intervention in format and duration but did not encourage positive disambiguation of socially ambiguous or threatening scenarios.
Participants in both CBM-I programs (either standard or explicit instructions) and the c-CBT condition exhibited more positive interpretations of ambiguous social scenarios at post-test and one-week follow-up as compared to the Control condition. Moreover, the results showed that CBM-I and c-CBT, to some extent, changed negative attention biases in a positive direction. Furthermore, the results showed that both CBM-I training conditions and c-CBT reduced social anxiety symptoms at one-week follow-up.
This study used a single session of CBM-I training, however multi-sessions intervention might result in more endurable positive CBM-I changes.
A computerised single session of CBM-I and an analogue of c-CBT program reduced negative interpretative biases and social anxiety.
本研究考察了单次认知偏差修正(CBM-I)对诱导积极解释偏差(CBM-I)的影响,使用标准或明确的指令以及计算机辅助认知行为疗法(c-CBT)程序的模拟来改变认知偏差和社交焦虑。
一组 76 名有社交焦虑的志愿者参加了一个研究地点。在预测试和后测试时,参与者都完成了两个计算机化的解释和注意偏差测试,以及一个社交焦虑的自我报告测量。在训练条件下的参与者完成了标准或明确的 CBM-I 阳性训练的单次疗程和 c-CBT 计划。在对照(无训练)条件下的参与者完成了 CBM-I 中性任务,其格式和持续时间与积极的 CBM-I 干预相匹配,但不鼓励对社会模糊或威胁性情景进行积极的消除歧义。
与对照条件相比,两种 CBM-I 程序(标准或明确的指令)和 c-CBT 条件的参与者在后测试和一周随访时对模糊的社交情景有更积极的解释。此外,结果表明 CBM-I 和 c-CBT 在某种程度上改变了负性注意偏向的积极方向。此外,结果表明 CBM-I 训练条件和 c-CBT 在一周随访时都降低了社交焦虑症状。
本研究使用了单次 CBM-I 训练,但多次干预可能会导致更持久的积极 CBM-I 变化。
计算机化的单次 CBM-I 和 c-CBT 程序减少了负性解释偏差和社交焦虑。