• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国西南地区糖尿病足感染患者的微生物分布及药敏情况。

Distribution of Microbes and Drug Susceptibility in Patients with Diabetic Foot Infections in Southwest China.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.

出版信息

J Diabetes Res. 2018 Aug 5;2018:9817308. doi: 10.1155/2018/9817308. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/9817308
PMID:30175153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6098928/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the microbial distribution and drug susceptibility among diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) with different Wagner grades and between acute and chronic DFUs. We enrolled 428 DFU patients who were hospitalized and treated in the Southwest Hospital. We collected deep ulcer secretion for microbial culture and drug susceptibility tests and analyzed the results. We reexamined 67 patients with poor anti-infection efficacy and analyzed microbial species. : The 354 positive samples included 201 cases (56.8%) of single-pathogen infections and 153 cases (43.2%) of multiple-pathogen infections before antibiotic therapy. A total of 555 strains were cultivated, including 205 (36.9%) strains of gram-positive organisms (GPOs), 283 (51.0%) gram-negative bacilli (GNB), and 67 (12.1%) fungal strains. In terms of distribution, patients with different Wagner grades had different bacterial composition ratios ( < 0.01). Patients with Wagner grades 3-5 mainly had GNB. The specimens from chronic ulcer wounds were primarily GNB (54.2%), whereas fungi accounted for 14.4% of the infections; the distribution was significantly different from that of acute ulcers ( < 0.01). The susceptibility tests showed that the genus was more susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline. Tobramycin was the most effective drug (97%) for the treatment of , followed by ertapenem (96.4%), imipenem (93.5%), and cefotetan (90%). Most of the remaining GNB were susceptible to antibiotics such as carbapenems, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, ceftazidime, cefepime, and piperacillin-tazobactam (>63.2%). After antibiotic therapy, the positive rate of microbial culture was 52.2%, and the proportion of GNB and fungi increased to 68.9% and 20%.

CONCLUSION

The distribution and types of bacteria in diabetic foot infection (DFI) patients varied with the different Wagner classification grades, courses of the ulcers, and antibiotic therapy. Multidrug resistance were increased, and the clinical treatment of DFIs should select the most suitable antibiotics based on the pathogen culture and drug susceptibility test results.

摘要

目的

探讨不同 Wagner 分级及急慢性糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)中微生物分布及药敏情况。我们纳入了 428 例在西南医院住院治疗的 DFU 患者,采集深部溃疡分泌物进行微生物培养和药敏试验,并对结果进行分析。对 67 例抗感染疗效不佳的患者进行了再检查,并分析了微生物种类。结果:354 例阳性标本中,抗生素治疗前,单一致病菌感染 201 例(56.8%),多致病菌感染 153 例(43.2%)。共培养出 555 株,其中革兰阳性菌(GPO)205 株(36.9%),革兰阴性杆菌(GNB)283 株(51.0%),真菌 67 株(12.1%)。分布上,不同 Wagner 分级患者细菌构成比不同(<0.01)。Wagner 分级 3-5 级患者主要为 GNB,慢性溃疡创面标本以 GNB 为主(54.2%),真菌占 14.4%,与急性溃疡分布差异有统计学意义(<0.01)。药敏试验显示属对万古霉素、利奈唑胺、替加环素较敏感,治疗 效果最好的药物为妥布霉素(97%),其次为厄他培南(96.4%)、亚胺培南(93.5%)、头孢替坦(90%)。其余 GNB 对碳青霉烯类、氨基糖苷类、氟喹诺酮类、头孢他啶、头孢吡肟、哌拉西林他唑巴坦等抗生素的敏感性较高(>63.2%)。抗生素治疗后,微生物培养阳性率为 52.2%,GNB 和真菌比例增加至 68.9%和 20%。结论:糖尿病足感染(DFI)患者的细菌分布和类型随 Wagner 分级、溃疡病程及抗生素治疗而变化,多重耐药性增加,DFIs 的临床治疗应根据病原菌培养和药敏试验结果选择最合适的抗生素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31e/6098928/7d025c112a51/JDR2018-9817308.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31e/6098928/aae9a8fd5f44/JDR2018-9817308.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31e/6098928/81f665e2869d/JDR2018-9817308.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31e/6098928/1411c03849b6/JDR2018-9817308.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31e/6098928/7d025c112a51/JDR2018-9817308.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31e/6098928/aae9a8fd5f44/JDR2018-9817308.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31e/6098928/81f665e2869d/JDR2018-9817308.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31e/6098928/1411c03849b6/JDR2018-9817308.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31e/6098928/7d025c112a51/JDR2018-9817308.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Distribution of Microbes and Drug Susceptibility in Patients with Diabetic Foot Infections in Southwest China.中国西南地区糖尿病足感染患者的微生物分布及药敏情况。
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Aug 5;2018:9817308. doi: 10.1155/2018/9817308. eCollection 2018.
2
Distribution of microbes and antimicrobial susceptibility in patients with diabetic foot infections in South China.中国南方地区糖尿病足感染患者的微生物分布及药敏情况。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 24;14:1113622. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1113622. eCollection 2023.
3
Microbial Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern in Diabetic Patients with Mild, Moderate, and Severe Foot Infections in Tehran.德黑兰轻、中、重度糖尿病足感染患者的微生物谱及抗生素药敏模式。
Arch Razi Inst. 2022 Oct 31;77(5):1925-1933. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.359759.2476. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Analysis of Distribution and Drug Susceptibility Test Results of Pathogenic Bacteria in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡病原菌分布及药敏试验结果分析
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Jul;15(7):1627-1637. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01601-x. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Infection Characteristics and Drug Susceptibility of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡患者的多重耐药菌感染特征及药敏分析。
Clin Lab. 2023 Sep 1;69(9). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230309.
6
Microbiological Distribution, Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Risk Factors of Polymicrobial Infections in Diabetic Foot.糖尿病足的微生物分布、药敏情况及混合感染的危险因素
Clin Lab. 2024 Apr 1;70(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.231114.
7
Bacterial Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in the Northeast of Tamaulipas, Mexico.墨西哥塔毛利帕斯州东北部糖尿病足溃疡临床分离株中的细菌流行情况及抗生素耐药性
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2017 Jun;16(2):129-134. doi: 10.1177/1534734617705254. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
8
Microbial Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Diabetic Foot Ulcer in China: Literature Review.中国糖尿病足溃疡的微生物感染与抗生素耐药性:文献综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 19;13:881659. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.881659. eCollection 2022.
9
Distribution and drug sensitivity of pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot ulcer patients with necrotizing fasciitis at a diabetic foot center in China.中国糖尿病足中心坏疽性筋膜炎合并糖尿病足溃疡患者病原菌分布及药敏分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07382-7.
10
Different Patterns of Bacterial Species and Antibiotic Susceptibility in Diabetic Foot Syndrome with and without Coexistent Ischemia.糖尿病足综合征伴与不伴合并缺血时的细菌种类和抗生素敏感性的不同模式。
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Apr 27;2021:9947233. doi: 10.1155/2021/9947233. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and negative pressure wound therapy in multidrug-resistant organisms diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis.载抗生素骨水泥与负压伤口治疗对耐多药菌糖尿病足溃疡的临床疗效:一项回顾性分析
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jan 3;14:1521199. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1521199. eCollection 2024.
2
Identification and treatment of -induced diabetic foot ulcer: a case report and microbiome analysis.诱导性糖尿病足溃疡的识别与治疗:一例病例报告及微生物组分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 20;11:1502337. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1502337. eCollection 2024.
3
[Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Prolonged Hospitalization in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers].

本文引用的文献

1
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bacteremia: Comparison of pediatric and adult populations.产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌菌血症:儿童与成人人群的比较。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018 Dec;51(6):723-731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Extended spectrum beta-lactamase and metallo beta-lactamase production among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from different clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.在尼泊尔加德满都一家三级护理医院中,从不同临床样本分离出的大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌中产超广谱β-内酰胺酶和金属β-内酰胺酶的情况。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017 Sep 19;16(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12941-017-0236-7.
3
[糖尿病足溃疡患者长期住院风险预测模型的开发与验证]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jul 20;55(4):972-979. doi: 10.12182/20240760507.
4
Prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis.糖尿病足溃疡中多重耐药菌感染的流行:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14864. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14864.
5
Distribution of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in diabetic foot ulcers and risk factors for drug resistance: a retrospective analysis.糖尿病足溃疡患者中多重耐药菌感染的分布及耐药危险因素分析:一项回顾性研究
PeerJ. 2023 Oct 9;11:e16162. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16162. eCollection 2023.
6
Microbial Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern in Diabetic Patients with Mild, Moderate, and Severe Foot Infections in Tehran.德黑兰轻、中、重度糖尿病足感染患者的微生物谱及抗生素药敏模式。
Arch Razi Inst. 2022 Oct 31;77(5):1925-1933. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.359759.2476. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Culture and sensitivity pattern of aerobic bacterial isolates in diabetic foot infections during 2018-2022 in Asian countries: a literature review study.2018 - 2022年亚洲国家糖尿病足感染中需氧菌分离株的培养及药敏模式:一项文献综述研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Feb 17;85(2):161-165. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000223. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Distribution of microbes and antimicrobial susceptibility in patients with diabetic foot infections in South China.中国南方地区糖尿病足感染患者的微生物分布及药敏情况。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 24;14:1113622. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1113622. eCollection 2023.
9
Biofilms in Chronic Wound Infections: Innovative Antimicrobial Approaches Using the In Vitro Lubbock Chronic Wound Biofilm Model.慢性伤口感染中的生物膜:使用体外拉伯克慢性伤口生物膜模型的创新抗菌方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 5;24(2):1004. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021004.
10
Diabetic foot ulcer in Southern Jordan: A cross-sectional Study of Clinical and Microbiological Aspects.约旦南部的糖尿病足溃疡:临床与微生物学方面的横断面研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 2;76:103552. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103552. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamases Producing Organisms Isolated in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bangladesh.
孟加拉国一家三级护理医院分离出的产超广谱β-内酰胺酶微生物的抗菌药敏模式
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3):189-192. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_28_16.
4
Empirical Antibiotic Treatment in Diabetic Foot Infection: A Study Focusing on the Culture and Antibiotic Sensitivity in a Population From Southern China.糖尿病足感染的经验性抗生素治疗:一项聚焦于中国南方人群培养及抗生素敏感性的研究
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2017 Sep;16(3):173-182. doi: 10.1177/1534734617725410. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
5
Risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetic foot infection: a prospective study.糖尿病足感染患者截肢的风险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1219-1224. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12788. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
6
Bacterial Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in the Northeast of Tamaulipas, Mexico.墨西哥塔毛利帕斯州东北部糖尿病足溃疡临床分离株中的细菌流行情况及抗生素耐药性
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2017 Jun;16(2):129-134. doi: 10.1177/1534734617705254. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
7
Microbiological pattern of diabetic foot infections at a tertiary care center in a developing country.发展中国家一家三级医疗中心糖尿病足感染的微生物学特征
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):665-669.
8
Bacterial Contribution in Chronicity of Wounds.细菌在伤口慢性化中的作用
Microb Ecol. 2017 Apr;73(3):710-721. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0867-9. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
9
Staphylococcus aureus Toxins and Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Role in Pathogenesis and Interest in Diagnosis.金黄色葡萄球菌毒素与糖尿病足溃疡:在发病机制中的作用及诊断意义
Toxins (Basel). 2016 Jul 7;8(7):209. doi: 10.3390/toxins8070209.
10
Diabetic Foot Infection in Morocco: Microbiological Profile.摩洛哥的糖尿病足感染:微生物学特征
Wounds. 2016 Mar;28(3):89-98.