• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展中国家一家三级医疗中心糖尿病足感染的微生物学特征

Microbiological pattern of diabetic foot infections at a tertiary care center in a developing country.

作者信息

Miyan Zahid, Fawwad Asher, Sabir Rubina, Basit Abdul

机构信息

Baqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Baqai Medical University, Karachi.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):665-669.

PMID:28507348
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of organisms isolated from diabetic foot ulcers in a tertiary care hospital Karachi, Pakistan.

METHODS

This descriptive study was conducted at the Baqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology (BIDE), from January 2013 to March 2014. Bone, pus and tissue samples were collected from 342 patients with diabetic foot infections and inoculated on appropriate media. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were done by Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method.

RESULTS

A total of 671 aerobic bacteria were isolated from 473 specimens with an average of 1.45 isolates per specimen. Poly-microbial infection was 56.87%. Gram- negative isolates were predominant 76.27%.Staphylococcus aureus was most frequent among Gram-positive 20.7% and Escherichia coli 15.72% in Gram negative isolates. MRSA was found in 26.76% Staphylococcus aureus. About 33.48% of antimicrobial resistant isolates were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, Gram negative aerobes were predominant in the diabetic foot infections. A significant number of MDR isolates were also observed in this cohort. Delayed referral and inappropriate use of broad spectrum antibiotics may be the main cause of increase in the frequency of MDR isolates.

摘要

目的

确定从巴基斯坦卡拉奇一家三级护理医院的糖尿病足溃疡中分离出的微生物谱及抗生素敏感性模式。

方法

本描述性研究于2013年1月至2014年3月在巴基糖尿病与内分泌研究所(BIDE)进行。从342例糖尿病足感染患者中采集骨、脓液和组织样本,并接种于合适的培养基上。采用 Kirby Bauer 纸片扩散法进行抗生素敏感性试验。

结果

从473份标本中总共分离出671株需氧菌,每份标本平均分离出1.45株。混合感染率为56.87%。革兰氏阴性菌分离株占主导,为76.27%。革兰氏阳性菌中金黄色葡萄球菌最为常见,占20.7%,革兰氏阴性菌中大肠杆菌占15.72%。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)在金黄色葡萄球菌中占26.76%。观察到约33.48%的抗菌药物耐药分离株。

结论

在我们的研究中,革兰氏阴性需氧菌在糖尿病足感染中占主导。在该队列中也观察到大量多重耐药分离株。延迟转诊和广谱抗生素的不当使用可能是多重耐药分离株频率增加的主要原因。

相似文献

1
Microbiological pattern of diabetic foot infections at a tertiary care center in a developing country.发展中国家一家三级医疗中心糖尿病足感染的微生物学特征
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):665-669.
2
The Most Prevalent Organism in Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Its Drug Sensitivity and Resistance to Different Standard Antibiotics.糖尿病足溃疡中最常见的病原体及其对不同标准抗生素的药敏和耐药情况。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Apr;26(4):293-6.
3
Prevalence of methicillin resistant , multidrug resistant and extended spectrum β-lactamase producing gram negative bacilli causing wound infections at a tertiary care hospital of Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级护理医院伤口感染的耐甲氧西林、多药耐药和产超广谱 β-内酰胺酶革兰氏阴性杆菌的流行情况。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Oct 8;7:121. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0408-z. eCollection 2018.
4
Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of aerobes in diabetic foot ulcers in a South-Indian tertiary care hospital.印度南部一家三级护理医院糖尿病足溃疡需氧菌的抗菌药敏模式
Foot (Edinb). 2018 Dec;37:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
5
[Diabetic foot infections. Prevalence and antibiotic sensitivity of the causative microorganisms].[糖尿病足感染。致病微生物的患病率及抗生素敏感性]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2009 Jun;27(6):317-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2008.07.004. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
6
Bacterial isolation and antibiotic susceptibility from diabetic foot ulcers in Kenya using microbiological tests and comparison with RT-PCR in detection of S. aureus and MRSA.采用微生物检测方法,对肯尼亚糖尿病足溃疡患者进行细菌分离及抗生素敏感性检测,并与逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测金黄色葡萄球菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的结果进行比较。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Apr 29;12(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4278-0.
7
Bacteriological Profile And Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns In Diabetic Foot Infections, At Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar.白沙瓦市雷丁夫人医院糖尿病足感染的细菌学特征及抗生素敏感性模式
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020 Jul-Sep;32(3):382-388.
8
Microbiological profile of bacterial pathogens from diabetic foot infections in tertiary care hospitals, Salem.塞勒姆三级护理医院糖尿病足感染细菌病原体的微生物学特征
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2014 Jul-Sep;8(3):129-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
9
Microbiological Pattern, Antimicrobial Resistance and Prevalence of MDR/XDR Organisms in Patients With Diabetic Foot Infection in an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital.印度一家三级护理医院糖尿病足感染患者的微生物模式、抗菌药物耐药性和 MDR/XDR 生物体流行情况。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023 Dec;22(4):695-703. doi: 10.1177/15347346211038090. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Diabetic Foot Infection: Causative Pathogens and Empiric Antibiotherapy Considerations-The Experience of a Tertiary Center.糖尿病足感染:致病病原体及经验性抗生素治疗考量——一家三级医疗中心的经验
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019 Jun;18(2):122-128. doi: 10.1177/1534734619839815. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbiological profile of diabetic foot infections in China and worldwide: a 20-year systematic review.中国及全球范围内糖尿病足感染的微生物学特征:一项 20 年的系统综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 28;15:1368046. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1368046. eCollection 2024.
2
Prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis.糖尿病足溃疡中多重耐药菌感染的流行:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14864. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14864.
3
What's old is new again: Insights into diabetic foot microbiome.
旧貌换新颜:对糖尿病足微生物群的见解。
World J Diabetes. 2023 Jun 15;14(6):680-704. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i6.680.
4
Evaluation of the Use of Antimicrobial Therapy for Treating Diabetic Foot Infections in an Indonesia Referral Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.印度尼西亚一家转诊医院使用抗菌疗法治疗糖尿病足感染的评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
Infect Chemother. 2023 Mar;55(1):80-89. doi: 10.3947/ic.2022.0084. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
5
Fig latex inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria invading human diabetic wounds and accelerates wound closure in diabetic mice.Fig 乳清酸抑制入侵人糖尿病伤口的病原菌生长并加速糖尿病小鼠伤口闭合。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 17;12(1):21852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26338-0.
6
Bacteriophage therapy as an alternative technique for treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria causing diabetic foot infection.噬菌体疗法作为一种治疗糖尿病足感染的多药耐药菌的替代技术。
Int Microbiol. 2023 May;26(2):343-359. doi: 10.1007/s10123-022-00293-2. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
7
Bacterial isolates from diabetic foot ulcers and their antimicrobial resistance profile from selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.来自埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴选定医院的糖尿病足溃疡细菌分离株及其抗菌药物耐药谱。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 31;13:987487. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.987487. eCollection 2022.
8
Microbial Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Diabetic Foot Ulcer in China: Literature Review.中国糖尿病足溃疡的微生物感染与抗生素耐药性:文献综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 19;13:881659. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.881659. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparison of efficacy of systemic antibiotics alone and combination of systemic antibiotics with gentamicin cream in diabetic foot infections.单纯全身使用抗生素与全身使用抗生素联合庆大霉素乳膏治疗糖尿病足感染的疗效比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(3Part-I):663-667. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.3.3277.
10
Microbiome Characterization of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Association With Clinical Outcomes: Traditional Cultures Versus Molecular Sequencing Methods.感染性糖尿病足溃疡的微生物组特征及其与临床结局的关系:传统培养与分子测序方法的比较。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Mar 24;12:836699. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.836699. eCollection 2022.