Suppr超能文献

急性心肌缺血心电图检测标准:敏感性与特异性

Criteria for ECG detection of acute myocardial ischemia: Sensitivity versus specificity.

作者信息

Wang John J, Pahlm Olle, Warren James W, Sapp John L, Horáček B Milan

机构信息

Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2018 Nov-Dec;51(6S):S12-S17. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Criteria for electrocardiographic detection of acute myocardial ischemia recommended by the Consensus Document of ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF consist of two parts: The ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria based on ST elevation (ST↑) in 10 pairs of contiguous leads and the other on ST depression (ST↓) in the same 10 contiguous pairs. Our aim was to assess sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of these criteria-and to seek their possible improvements-in three databases of 12‑lead ECGs.

METHODS

We used (1) STAFF III data of controlled ischemic episodes recorded from 99 patients (pts) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involving either left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, right coronary artery (RCA), or left circumflex (LCx) coronary artery. (2) Data from the University of Glasgow for 58 pts with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 58 pts without AMI, as confirmed by MRI. (3) Data from Lund University retrieved from a centralized ECG management system for 100 pts with various pathological ST changes-other than acute coronary occlusion-including ventricular pre-excitation, acute pericarditis, early repolarization syndrome, left ventricular hypertrophy, and left bundle branch block. ST measurements at J-point in ECGs of all 315 pts were obtained automatically on the averaged beat with manual review and the recommended criteria as well as their proposed modifications, were applied. Performance measures included SE, SP, positive predictive value (PPV), and benefit-to-harm ratio (BHR), defined as the ratio of true-positive vs. false-positive detections.

RESULTS

We found that the SE of widely-used STEMI criteria can be indeed improved by the additional ST↓ criteria, but at the cost of markedly decreased SP. In contrast, using ST↑ in only 3 additional contiguous pairs of leads (STEMI13) can boost SE without any loss of SP. In the STAFF III database, SE/SP/PPV were 56/98/97% for the STEMI, 79/79/79% for the STEMI with added ST↓ and 67/97/96% for the STEMI13. In the Glasgow database, corresponding SE/SP/PPV were 43/98/96%, 84/90/89%, and 55/98/97%. For the Lund database, SP was 56% for the STEMI, 24% for the STEMI with ST↓, and 56% for the STEMI13.

CONCLUSION

Current recommended criteria for detecting acute myocardial ischemia, involving ST↓, boost SE of widely-used STEMI criteria, at the cost of SP. To keep the SP high, we propose either the adjustment of threshold for the added ST↓ criteria or a selective use of ST↓ only in contiguous leads V2 and V3 plus ST↑ in lead pairs (aVL, -III) and (III, -aVL).

摘要

背景

欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)/美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF)/美国心脏协会(AHA)/世界心脏联盟(WHF)共识文件推荐的急性心肌缺血心电图检测标准由两部分组成:基于10对相邻导联ST段抬高(ST↑)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)标准,以及基于同一10对相邻导联ST段压低(ST↓)的另一标准。我们的目的是在三个12导联心电图数据库中评估这些标准的敏感性(SE)和特异性(SP),并寻求可能的改进方法。

方法

我们使用了(1)99例患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间记录的控制性缺血发作的STAFF III数据,PCI涉及左前降支(LAD)冠状动脉、右冠状动脉(RCA)或左旋支(LCx)冠状动脉。(2)来自格拉斯哥大学的数据,包括58例经MRI证实的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者和58例无AMI患者。(3)从隆德大学的集中式心电图管理系统中获取的数据,涉及100例有各种病理性ST段改变(非急性冠状动脉闭塞)的患者,包括心室预激、急性心包炎、早期复极综合征、左心室肥厚和左束支传导阻滞。对所有315例患者心电图的J点进行ST段测量,自动获取平均心搏数据,并进行人工审核,同时应用推荐标准及其建议的修改标准。性能指标包括SE、SP、阳性预测值(PPV)和获益与危害比(BHR),BHR定义为真阳性检测与假阳性检测的比值。

结果

我们发现,广泛使用的STEMI标准的SE确实可以通过增加ST↓标准得到改善,但代价是SP显著降低。相比之下,仅在另外3对相邻导联中使用ST↑(STEMI13)可以提高SE,而不会损失SP。在STAFF III数据库中,STEMI的SE/SP/PPV分别为56/98/97%,增加ST↓后的STEMI为79/79/79%,STEMI13为67/97/96%。在格拉斯哥数据库中,相应的SE/SP/PPV分别为43/98/96%、84/90/89%和55/98/97%。对于隆德数据库,STEMI的SP为56%,增加ST↓后的STEMI为24%,STEMI13为56%。

结论

目前推荐的检测急性心肌缺血的标准,包括ST↓,以牺牲SP为代价提高了广泛使用的STEMI标准的SE。为保持高SP,我们建议要么调整增加的ST↓标准的阈值,要么仅在相邻导联V2和V3中选择性使用ST↓,并在导联对(aVL,-III)和(III,-aVL)中使用ST↑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验