• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究量词的心理表征。

Probing the mental representation of quantifiers.

机构信息

CIMeC - Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Corso Bettini, 31, Rovereto, Italy.

CIMeC - Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Corso Bettini, 31, Rovereto, Italy; DISI-Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Via Sommarive, 9, Trento, Italy.

出版信息

Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.009
PMID:30179744
Abstract

In this study, we investigate the mental representation of non-numerical quantifiers ("some", "many", "all", etc.) by comparing their use in abstract and in grounded perceptual contexts. Using an approach similar to that used in the number domain, we test whether (and to what extent) such representation is constrained by the way we perceive the world through our senses. In two experiments, subjects either judged the similarity of quantifier pairs (presented as written words) or chose among a predetermined list of quantifiers the one that best described a visual image depicting a variable number of target and non-target items. The results were rather consistent across experiments, and indicated that quantifiers are mentally organized on an ordered but non-linear compressed scale where the quantifiers that imply small quantities appear more precisely differentiated across each other compared to those implying large quantities. This fits nicely with the idea that we construct our representations of such symbols mainly by mapping them to the representations of quantities that we derive from perception.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们通过比较抽象和基于感知的语境来研究非数值量词(“一些”,“许多”,“全部”等)的心理表示。我们使用类似于数字领域中使用的方法,测试这种表示是否(以及在何种程度上)受到我们通过感官感知世界的方式的限制。在两项实验中,受试者要么判断量词对(以书面形式呈现)的相似性,要么从预定的量词列表中选择最能描述描绘可变数量的目标和非目标项目的视觉图像的量词。结果在两个实验中都相当一致,表明量词在一个有序但非线性的压缩尺度上进行心理组织,其中表示小数量的量词彼此之间的区分更为精确,而表示大数量的量词则不然。这与我们主要通过将这些符号映射到我们从感知中得出的数量的表示来构建它们的表示的观点非常吻合。

相似文献

1
Probing the mental representation of quantifiers.探究量词的心理表征。
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
2
The logic in language: How all quantifiers are alike, but each quantifier is different.语言中的逻辑:所有量词如何相似,但每个量词又如何不同。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jun;87:29-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 28.
3
When three is not some: on the pragmatics of numerals.当三不是一些:论数词的语用学。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Apr;26(4):854-63. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00514. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
4
Processing of Numerical and Proportional Quantifiers.数值和比例量词的处理
Cogn Sci. 2015 Sep;39(7):1504-36. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12219. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
5
Questions About Quantifiers: Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Quantity Processing by the Brain.关于量词的问题:大脑对符号和非符号数量的处理
Cogn Sci. 2023 Oct;47(10):e13346. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13346.
6
The mental representation of nonnumerical quantifiers: The Spatial-Linguistic Association of Response Codes (SLARC) effect.非数字量词的心理表征:反应编码的空间-语言关联(SLARC)效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;47(12):2021-2028. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001037. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
7
Finding one's meaning: a test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development.寻找意义:语言发展中量词与整数关系的一项测试。
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):195-219. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
8
Taking the high (or low) road: a quantifier priming perspective on basic anchoring effects.走高端(或低端)路线:基本锚定效应的量词启动视角。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul-Aug;153(4):424-47. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.757543.
9
"Few" or "Many"? An Adaptation Level Theory Account for Flexibility in Quantifier Processing.“少”还是“多”?一种关于量词处理灵活性的适应水平理论解释
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 20;11:382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00382. eCollection 2020.
10
Characterizing the neural coding of symbolic quantities.刻画符号数量的神经编码。
Neuroimage. 2018 Sep;178:503-518. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.062. Epub 2018 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifier processing and semantic flexibility in patients with aphasia.失语症患者的量词处理与语义灵活性
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 18;15:1328853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1328853. eCollection 2024.
2
Most quantifiers have many meanings.大多数量词有多种含义。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2692-2703. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02502-7. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Early number word learning: Associations with domain-general and domain-specific quantitative abilities.早期数字词学习:与一般领域和特定领域定量能力的关联。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 25;13:1024426. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024426. eCollection 2022.
4
Negative polarity in quantifiers evokes greater activation in language-related regions compared to negative polarity in adjectives.与形容词的否定极性相比,量词的否定极性在语言相关区域引起更大的激活。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 May;239(5):1427-1438. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06067-y. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
5
So Many Are "Few," but so Few Are Also "Few" - Reduced Semantic Flexibility in bvFTD Patients.如此多的“少数”,但如此少的也是“少数”——bvFTD患者语义灵活性降低
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 3;11:582. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00582. eCollection 2020.
6
"Few" or "Many"? An Adaptation Level Theory Account for Flexibility in Quantifier Processing.“少”还是“多”?一种关于量词处理灵活性的适应水平理论解释
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 20;11:382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00382. eCollection 2020.
7
Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Meaning of Quantifiers: Implications for Pragmatic Enrichment.量词意义的跨语言变异:对语用充实的启示
Front Psychol. 2019 May 15;10:957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00957. eCollection 2019.
8
Development of Quantitative and Temporal Scalar Implicatures in a Felicity Judgment Task.在恰当性判断任务中数量和时间量级含义的发展
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;9:2763. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02763. eCollection 2018.