• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳洛酮的有效性:一项系统评价。

Naloxone Effectiveness: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Chimbar Lisa, Moleta Yvette

机构信息

Lisa Chimbar, BSN, RN, CCRN, and Yvette Moleta, BSN, RN, Simmons College, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Addict Nurs. 2018 Jul/Sep;29(3):167-171. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000230.

DOI:10.1097/JAN.0000000000000230
PMID:30180002
Abstract

PURPOSE

Opioid abuse and overdose is a public health concern as it relates to increased morbidity and mortality. This systematic review focuses on the application of take-home naloxone programs and its association with decreased mortality among those who abuse opioids. Take-home naloxone programs consist of distributed naloxone kits and corresponding education of overdose recognition. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine if programs that supply take-home naloxone are effective in preventing fatal overdoses among those who abuse opioids.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Academic Search Complete, CINHAL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and SocINDEX. The key words searched were "programs," "take-home kits," "Narcan," "Naloxone," and "mortality." On the basis of the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, nine studies were found for inclusion.

RESULTS

Study results were then synthesized, qualitatively, and within the current research, there is overwhelming support of take-home naloxone programs being effective in preventing fatal opioid overdoses. A significant limitation of this systematic review is the lack of randomized controlled trials as it is viewed as unethical withholding a known lifesaving medication from an at-risk population.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

On the basis of the most current evidence, there is overwhelming support of take-home naloxone programs associated with decreased mortality among those who abuse opioids. As a result, there is an implication for a practice change that take-home naloxone programs should be more widely implemented throughout communities as a method of decreasing mortality associated with opioid overdoses. It is recommended that further research is done examining the cost-effectiveness of these programs.

摘要

目的

阿片类药物滥用和过量使用是一个公共卫生问题,因为它与发病率和死亡率的增加有关。本系统评价聚焦于居家使用纳洛酮项目的应用及其与阿片类药物滥用者死亡率降低之间的关联。居家使用纳洛酮项目包括分发纳洛酮试剂盒以及对过量用药识别的相应教育。本系统评价的目的是确定提供居家使用纳洛酮的项目在预防阿片类药物滥用者致命过量用药方面是否有效。

方法

在《学术搜索完整版》《护理学与健康领域数据库》《医学索引》《心理学文摘数据库》和《社会科学期刊索引》中进行了系统检索。检索的关键词为“项目”“居家试剂盒”“纳曲酮”“纳洛酮”和“死亡率”。根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准,发现有9项研究可纳入。

结果

然后对研究结果进行了定性综合,在当前研究中,有压倒性的证据支持居家使用纳洛酮项目在预防致命阿片类药物过量用药方面是有效的。本系统评价的一个重大局限是缺乏随机对照试验,因为从高危人群中 withholding 一种已知的救命药物被视为不道德。

实践意义

基于最新证据,有压倒性的证据支持居家使用纳洛酮项目与阿片类药物滥用者死亡率降低相关。因此,这意味着应改变做法,居家使用纳洛酮项目应在社区更广泛地实施,作为降低与阿片类药物过量用药相关死亡率的一种方法。建议进一步研究这些项目的成本效益。 (注:“withholding”此处原文有误,可能影响准确理解,推测可能是“withholding”,意为“不给,扣留” )

相似文献

1
Naloxone Effectiveness: A Systematic Review.纳洛酮的有效性:一项系统评价。
J Addict Nurs. 2018 Jul/Sep;29(3):167-171. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000230.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care.用于癌症患者和接受姑息治疗患者的阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD006332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006332.pub3.
4
Oral naltrexone as a treatment for relapse prevention in formerly opioid-dependent drug users: a systematic review and economic evaluation.口服纳曲酮用于预防曾对阿片类药物依赖的吸毒者复吸:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Feb;11(6):iii-iv, 1-85. doi: 10.3310/hta11060.
5
Does naloxone provision lead to increased substance use? A systematic review to assess if there is evidence of a 'moral hazard' associated with naloxone supply.纳洛酮供应是否会导致药物使用增加?一项系统评价评估与纳洛酮供应相关的“道德风险”是否存在证据。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Feb;100:103513. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103513. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
7
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
8
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
9
Interventions for paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose.对乙酰氨基酚过量的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 23;2(2):CD003328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003328.pub3.
10
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of take-home naloxone: Lessons learned from a 3-year take-home naloxone project in Germany.纳洛酮带回家计划的实施:德国一项为期三年的纳洛酮带回家项目的经验教训。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jul 18;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01281-1.
2
The opportunity to save a life: A qualitative study of a point-of-care overdose education and naloxone distribution intervention.挽救生命的契机:一项关于即时护理过量用药教育及纳洛酮分发干预措施的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0326495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326495. eCollection 2025.
3
Naloxone dosing by non-medical first-responders at opioid overdoses: findings from a qualitative interview study.
非医疗急救人员在阿片类药物过量时使用纳洛酮的情况:一项定性访谈研究的结果
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Apr 18;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01203-1.
4
"Either way, they will use. And so, probably, would you:" A critical discourse analysis of harm reduction portrayal in United States opinion news media.“无论哪种方式,他们都会使用。所以,你可能也会:”对美国观点新闻媒体中减少伤害描述的批判性话语分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jun;140:104801. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104801. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
5
Pattern and impact of antidotal administration in an Egyptian tertiary poison control center: A three-year retrospective study (2021-2023).埃及一家三级中毒控制中心解毒剂使用模式及影响:一项为期三年的回顾性研究(2021 - 2023年)
Toxicol Rep. 2025 Feb 21;14:101973. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101973. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Increasing take-home naloxone kit distribution to patients with substance use disorder before hospital discharge: a quality improvement project.在出院前增加向物质使用障碍患者发放纳洛酮急救包:一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 17;14(1):e002908. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002908.
7
Expecting medication misuse: a proactive approach to drug discovery to prevent fatal overdose.预期药物滥用:预防致命过量用药的药物发现主动方法。
Future Med Chem. 2025 Mar;17(6):681-692. doi: 10.1080/17568919.2025.2476388. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
8
Clinical Decision Support to Increase Emergency Department Naloxone Coprescribing: Implementation Report.临床决策支持以增加急诊纳洛酮共同处方:实施报告。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 6;12:e58276. doi: 10.2196/58276.
9
Scaling up! Staff e-learning for a national take-home naloxone program.扩大规模!面向全国带回家纳洛酮项目的员工电子学习。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Sep 17;6:1404646. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1404646. eCollection 2024.
10
A qualitative exploration of harm reduction in practice by street-based peer outreach workers.街头同伴外展工作者实践中的减少伤害的定性探索。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 30;21(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01076-w.