Suppr超能文献

其他专科医生对姑息治疗培训的需求:巴西肾脏病学家在肾脏支持治疗方面的能力提升(或自主掌握)

The need for training in palliative care for physicians in other specialties: Brazilian nephrologists empowerment (or appropriation) on renal supportive care.

作者信息

Tavares Alze Pereira Dos Santos, Tzanno-Matins Carmen, Arruda Marcio J C, Antunes Bárbara

机构信息

Brazilian Society of Nephrology, Committee of Renal Supportive Care, São Paulo, Brazil; Internal Medicine, Hospital Vitória, São Paulo, Brazil.

Brazilian Society of Nephrology, Committee of Renal Supportive Care, São Paulo, Brazil; Renal Class, Clínica de Hemodiálise, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;7(Suppl 3):S176-S186. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.07.07. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal Supportive/Palliative Care is gaining gradual recognition as a patient-centered care approach that should be integrated to the traditional disease-centered model of care, mainly in elder patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of this study was to assess knowledge, perceptions, attitude, experience and interest in palliative care among renal care providers.

METHODS

Online survey, administered between May 23 to June 13, 2017 to members of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN). Participants self-reported knowledge and behaviors regarding renal palliative care.

RESULTS

A total of 3,738 e-mails were sent, 224 (6%) providers completed the survey. Most respondents were under 50 years old (68.5%) and were nephrologists (98.2%). A request from a competent patient to discontinue dialysis would not be honored by 46% and 63% would probably continue dialysis if a patient become severely demented. On the other hand, respondents with ≥15 years of experience were more prone to stop dialysis (P=0.01) in patients who became permanently and severely demented. Respondents working only in private practice were more willing to continue dialysis in a severely demented patient than those working in a public healthcare system or both (P=0.02). Additionally, 87% of respondents would probably withhold dialysis in a permanently unconscious patient and 92% probably would not resuscitate a patient with a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order. Among factors that would have importance on a decision to not initiate dialysis, patient preferences (98.2%), advanced dementia (95%), poor clinical conditions (93.7%) and family wishes (92.3%) were top ranked by respondents. Most respondents routinely evaluate HRQoL (62%), pain and other symptoms ( 79%) and were very interested (96%) in improving knowledge about renal supportive care.

CONCLUSIONS

Brazilian nephrologists are often unaware of patient autonomy, more prone to withholding than withdrawing dialysis and deem wishes of the family quasi as important as patient preferences in the shared decision making process. Most Participants answered to evaluate pain and quality of life related to health (HRQoL) routinely and have great interest to learn about renal palliative care.

摘要

背景

肾脏支持性/姑息治疗作为一种以患者为中心的护理方法正逐渐得到认可,应将其纳入以疾病为中心的传统护理模式,主要针对老年晚期慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者。本研究的目的是评估肾脏护理提供者对姑息治疗的知识、认知、态度、经验和兴趣。

方法

2017年5月23日至6月13日对巴西肾脏病学会(BSN)成员进行在线调查。参与者自行报告有关肾脏姑息治疗的知识和行为。

结果

共发送3738封电子邮件,224名(6%)提供者完成了调查。大多数受访者年龄在50岁以下(68.5%),为肾脏病学家(98.2%)。46%的人不会尊重有行为能力的患者提出的停止透析的请求,如果患者出现严重痴呆,63%的人可能会继续进行透析。另一方面,有≥15年经验的受访者在患者出现永久性严重痴呆时更倾向于停止透析(P=0.01)。仅在私人诊所工作的受访者比在公共医疗系统工作或两者都工作的受访者更愿意在严重痴呆患者中继续进行透析(P=0.02)。此外,87%的受访者可能会在永久性昏迷患者中停止透析,92%的人可能不会对有“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱的患者进行复苏。在决定不开始透析的因素中,患者偏好(98.2%)、晚期痴呆(95%)、临床状况差(93.7%)和家庭意愿(92.3%)在受访者中排名靠前。大多数受访者常规评估健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)(62%)、疼痛和其他症状(79%),并且对提高肾脏支持性护理知识非常感兴趣(96%)。

结论

巴西肾脏病学家往往不了解患者自主权,更倾向于停止而不是撤除透析,并且在共同决策过程中认为家庭意愿几乎与患者偏好一样重要。大多数参与者回答说会常规评估疼痛和与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL),并且对了解肾脏姑息治疗非常感兴趣。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验