Alshamsi Fayez Ebrahim, Chaaban Ahmed, Alrukhaimi Mona, Bernieh Bassam, Bakoush Omran
a College of Medicine , United Arab Emirates University , United Arab Emirates.
b Nephrology Department , Tawam Hopsital , United Arab Emirates.
Libyan J Med. 2018 Dec;13(1):1490610. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2018.1490610.
Patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) with severely impaired cognitive function have no survival benefit from dialysis. We therefore undertook a survey to explore the renal physicians' practices of withholding and withdrawal of dialysis treatment in vegetative state patients in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A cross sectional survey of 29 nephrology practices in UAE exploring physicians' practices in making decisions of withholding and withdrawal of dialysis treatment during provision end-of-life care for patients in persistent vegetative state (PVS).The majority of participants practice in governmental non-for-profit dialysis units (79%), and think they are well prepared to make decision with patients and family on issues of dialysis withdrawal and withholding (69%). If a chronic dialysis patient became permanently unconscious only few respondents (17%) indicated probability of stopping dialysis. On the other hand, more respondents (48%) reported that dialysis is likely to be withheld in PVS patients who develop kidney failure. In high risk or poor prognosis ESKD patients and given how likely they would consider each option independently, respondents reported they are likely to consider time-limited dialysis in 78% of the time followed by stopping (46%) or forgoing (27%) dialysis. Majority of the participants perceived that their decisions in providing renal care for PVS patients in UAE were influenced by the family sociocultural beliefs (76% of participants), the current hospital policies (72% of participants), and by Islamic beliefs (66% of participants). Only few perceived access to palliative care (30%) and treatment cost (17%) to have an impact on their decision making.Decisions of initiation and continuation of dialysis treatment to ESKD patients in PVS are prevalent among nephrology practices in UAE. Development of local guidelines based on the societal values along with early integration of palliative kidney failure management care would be required to improve the quality of provision of end-of-life renal care in UAE.
ESKD: stage kidney disease; UAE: United Arab Emirates; PVS: persistent vegetative state; RPA: Renal Physicians Association; ASN: American Society of Nephrology; EMAN: Emirates Medical Association Nephrology Society; CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
认知功能严重受损的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者无法从透析中获得生存益处。因此,我们开展了一项调查,以探究阿联酋肾内科医生针对植物人患者停止和撤销透析治疗的做法。对阿联酋29个肾脏病医疗单位进行横断面调查,探究医生在为持续性植物状态(PVS)患者提供临终护理期间做出停止和撤销透析治疗决策的做法。大多数参与者就职于政府非营利性透析单位(79%),并认为他们已做好准备与患者及其家属就透析撤销和停止问题做出决策(69%)。如果慢性透析患者永久失去意识,只有少数受访者(17%)表示有可能停止透析。另一方面,更多受访者(48%)报告称,对于出现肾衰竭的PVS患者,可能会停止透析。在高风险或预后不良的ESKD患者中,考虑到他们独立选择每种方案的可能性,受访者报告称,他们在78%的情况下可能会考虑限时透析,其次是停止透析(46%)或放弃透析(27%)。大多数参与者认为,他们在为阿联酋PVS患者提供肾脏护理时的决策受到家庭社会文化信仰(76%的参与者)、当前医院政策(72%的参与者)和伊斯兰信仰(66%的参与者)的影响。只有少数人认为获得姑息治疗(30%)和治疗费用(17%)会对他们的决策产生影响。在阿联酋的肾脏病医疗单位中,为PVS患者启动和继续透析治疗的决策很普遍。需要根据社会价值观制定当地指南,并尽早将姑息性肾衰竭管理护理纳入其中,以提高阿联酋临终肾脏护理的质量。
ESKD:终末期肾病;UAE:阿联酋;PVS:持续性植物状态;RPA:肾脏内科医师协会;ASN:美国肾脏病学会;EMAN:阿联酋医学协会肾脏病学会;CPR:心肺复苏