• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发象形图以加强医护人员的用药安全实践及国际偏好。

Development of Pictograms to Enhance Medication Safety Practices of Health Care Workers and International Preferences.

作者信息

Vaillancourt Régis, Zender Mike P, Coulon Laurie, Pouliot Annie

机构信息

, OMM, CD, BPharm, PharmD, FCSHP, is with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario.

, MFA, is with the School of Design, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):243-257. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

PMID:30185998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6118828/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A panel of medication management experts previously identified 9 key medication safety issues and high-alert drug classes as representing the most pressing medication-handling issues in health care.

OBJECTIVE

To develop medication safety pictograms depicting medication safety issues and high-alert drug classes that represent medication-handling risks for health care personnel.

METHODS

An iterative design process, including activities such as semiotic analysis, design/redesign, and evaluation, was used to develop medication safety pictograms. Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and students listed and drew graphic elements to depict each of the 9 key medication safety issues. Graduate students in graphic design developed the preliminary pictograms for the study. A Delphi survey was then conducted with experts recruited from the International Pharmaceutical Federation to reach consensus on the pictograms and provide feedback to the graphic designers. Health care providers from around the world were invited to participate in a survey to determine a preferred pictogram for each safety warning.

RESULTS

For each medication safety issue, 3 to 5 pictograms were developed on the basis of graphic elements suggested by 52 health care providers. These pictograms were then presented to 58 experts in 2 rounds of a Delphi process. For each medication safety issue, consensus on the 2 best pictograms was reached and feedback provided. A total of 799 participants from 61 countries responded to the international preference survey. Most of the participants ( = 536, 67.1%) were Canadian, and of those, 385 (71.8%) were pharmacists. In 8 categories, consensus on the preferred pictogram was reached across the health care professions; however, a difference in preference was apparent for the pictogram representing "neuromuscular blocking agent", with nurses' preferred pictogram differing from the preference of other participants.

CONCLUSION

This project produced pictograms to illustrate 9 important medication safety issues, which can now be validated through comprehension and recall assessments. Further study can also determine their potential to reduce medication administration errors.

摘要

背景

一组药物管理专家此前确定了9个关键的药物安全问题和高警示药物类别,这些被视为医疗保健领域中最紧迫的药物处理问题。

目的

开发描绘药物安全问题和高警示药物类别的药物安全象形图,这些象形图代表了医护人员在药物处理过程中的风险。

方法

采用迭代设计过程,包括符号分析、设计/重新设计和评估等活动,以开发药物安全象形图。护士、医生、药剂师和学生列出并绘制图形元素,以描绘9个关键药物安全问题中的每一个。平面设计专业的研究生为该研究开发了初步的象形图。随后对从国际制药联合会招募的专家进行了德尔菲调查,以就象形图达成共识,并向平面设计师提供反馈。邀请来自世界各地的医疗保健提供者参与一项调查,以确定每个安全警告的首选象形图。

结果

针对每个药物安全问题,根据52名医疗保健提供者提出的图形元素,开发了3至5个象形图。然后在两轮德尔菲过程中,将这些象形图展示给58名专家。针对每个药物安全问题,就2个最佳象形图达成了共识并提供了反馈。来自61个国家的799名参与者回应了国际偏好调查。大多数参与者(n = 536,67.1%)是加拿大人,其中385人(71.8%)是药剂师。在8个类别中,医疗保健专业人员就首选象形图达成了共识;然而,对于代表“神经肌肉阻滞剂”的象形图,偏好存在明显差异,护士的首选象形图与其他参与者的偏好不同。

结论

该项目制作了象形图来说明9个重要的药物安全问题,现在可以通过理解和回忆评估来验证这些象形图。进一步的研究还可以确定它们在减少用药错误方面的潜力。

相似文献

1
Development of Pictograms to Enhance Medication Safety Practices of Health Care Workers and International Preferences.开发象形图以加强医护人员的用药安全实践及国际偏好。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):243-257. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
2
Pictograms for Safer Medication Management by Health Care Workers.医护人员用于更安全药物管理的象形图。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jul-Aug;69(4):286-93. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i4.1575. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
3
How Many Words Does a Picture Really Tell? Cross-sectional Descriptive Study of Pictogram Evaluation by Youth.一张图片究竟能传达多少信息?青少年象形图评估的横断面描述性研究。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2013 Jul;66(4):219-26. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v66i4.1269.
4
Validation of Pictograms for Safer Handling of Medications: Comprehension and Recall among Pharmacy Students.用于更安全用药操作的象形图验证:药学专业学生的理解与记忆
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):258-266. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
Pictograms for safer medication handling by health care workers: a validation study in nursing students in Poland.医护人员安全用药处理象形图:波兰护理学生中的验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 13;22(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08029-8.
6
Pharmaceutical pictograms: a model for development and testing for comprehension and utility.药品图形符号:用于理解和实用性的开发和测试模型。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):609-20. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 14.
7
Validation of pharmaceutical pictograms among older adults with limited English proficiency.对英语水平有限的老年群体进行药品图形符号验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):909-916. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
8
Evaluation of pharmaceutical pictograms by older "turkers": A cross-sectional crowdsourced study.老年人“土耳其人”对药品图形符号的评估:一项横断面众包研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jun;17(6):1079-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
9
Development and evaluation of pictograms on medication labels for patients with limited literacy skills in a culturally diverse multiethnic population.针对文化多元的多民族人群中识字能力有限的患者,开展药物标签象形图的开发与评估。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Sep-Oct;10(5):720-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
10
Evaluation, Modification, and Validation of Pictograms Depicting Medication Instructions in the Elderly.老年人用药说明象形图的评估、修改与验证
J Health Commun. 2016;21 Suppl 1:27-33. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1133737.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehension of prescription orders with and without pictograms: tool validation and comparative assessment among a sample of participants from a developing country.对有和没有象形图的处方医嘱的理解:来自一个发展中国家的参与者样本中的工具验证和比较评估。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):1926. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16856-5.
2
Exploring the Use of Pictograms in Privacy Agreements to Facilitate Communication Between Users and Data Collecting Entities: Randomized Controlled Trial.探索在隐私协议中使用象形图以促进用户与数据收集实体之间的沟通:随机对照试验。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jan 25;10:e34855. doi: 10.2196/34855.
3
Validation of Pictograms for Safer Handling of Medications: Comprehension and Recall among Pharmacy Students.用于更安全用药操作的象形图验证:药学专业学生的理解与记忆
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):258-266. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Pictograms for Safer Medication Management by Health Care Workers.医护人员用于更安全药物管理的象形图。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jul-Aug;69(4):286-93. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i4.1575. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
2
The effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce medication administration errors: a synthesis of findings from systematic reviews.旨在减少用药错误的干预措施的有效性:系统评价结果的综合分析
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Oct;24(7):845-858. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12390. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
Causes of medication administration errors in hospitals: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.医院给药错误的原因:定量和定性证据的系统评价。
Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;36(11):1045-67. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0090-2.
4
Pharmaceutical pictograms: a model for development and testing for comprehension and utility.药品图形符号:用于理解和实用性的开发和测试模型。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):609-20. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 14.
5
Graphic and cultural aspects of pictograms: an information ergonomics viewpoint.象形图的图形与文化方面:信息工效学视角
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:3398-403. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0615-3398.
6
Literature review: using pictographs in discharge instructions for older adults with low-literacy skills.文献综述:在为低识字技能的老年患者出院指导中使用象形图。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Nov;20(21-22):2984-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03814.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
7
Incidence, type and causes of dispensing errors: a review of the literature.配药错误的发生率、类型及原因:文献综述
Int J Pharm Pract. 2009 Feb;17(1):9-30.
8
The incidence and nature of prescribing and medication administration errors in paediatric inpatients.儿科住院患者处方和药物管理错误的发生率和性质。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Feb;95(2):113-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.158485. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
9
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
10
Impact of computerized prescriber order entry on the incidence of adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients.计算机化医嘱录入对儿科住院患者药物不良事件发生率的影响。
Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):1058-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3160.