Xiong Minchao, Zhao Nian, Qin Yan, Min Peng, Peng Hong, Zhang Yong, Fan Bin
Department of Radiology, Ezhou Central Hospital, Ezhou, Hubei 436000, P.R. China.
Medical Imaging Center, Dongfeng Hospital of Hubei Medical College, Shiyan, Hubei 442008, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Sep;16(3):1593-1596. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6392. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
The safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in patients undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker (Medtronic's EnRhythm MRI SureScan IPG (implantable pulse generator) and CapSureFix MRI pacing electrodes) implantation were evaluated. A total of 86 patients undergoing this pacemaker implantation who were admitted to Huanggang Hospital from June 2006 to March 2017 were continuously selected. On average 6.8±2.3 months after the implantation, the first MRI scan was conducted. The mean scan time was 2.2±0.9 and mean duration was 45.6±12.3 min; mean follow-up visit period was 40.5±15.6 months, and after follow-up, all the abnormal symptoms of patients and pacemaker abnormalities after scans were recorded. Causes of receiving MRI scans included neurological diseases (27%), spinal diseases (14%), cancers (26%), joint injuries (25%) and visceral systems (8%). A total of 12 cases (14.0%) showed significant discomfort symptoms, 10 cases (11.6%) showed pacemaker abnormalities, and the incidence rate was 25.6%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the basic types of cardiovascular diseases, dependence on pacemakers, duration of education, pacing threshold, impedance and MRI scan time were related to the occurrence of adverse scan results (p<0.05). In conclusion, MRI scans show that MRI-compatible dual-chamber pacemaker was relatively safe.
对接受双腔起搏器(美敦力公司的EnRhythm MRI SureScan IPG(植入式脉冲发生器)和CapSureFix MRI起搏电极)植入的患者进行磁共振成像(MRI)扫描的安全性进行了评估。连续选取了2006年6月至2017年3月入住黄冈医院接受这种起搏器植入的86例患者。植入后平均6.8±2.3个月进行首次MRI扫描。平均扫描时间为2.2±0.9,平均时长为45.6±12.3分钟;平均随访期为40.5±15.6个月,随访后记录患者的所有异常症状以及扫描后起搏器的异常情况。接受MRI扫描的原因包括神经系统疾病(27%)、脊柱疾病(14%)、癌症(26%)、关节损伤(25%)和内脏系统疾病(8%)。共有12例(14.0%)出现明显不适症状,10例(11.6%)出现起搏器异常,发生率为25.6%。多因素logistic回归分析显示,心血管疾病的基本类型、对起搏器的依赖程度、受教育时长、起搏阈值、阻抗和MRI扫描时间与扫描不良结果的发生有关(p<0.05)。总之,MRI扫描表明MRI兼容双腔起搏器相对安全。