• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道分娩的双胞胎与单胎妊娠产妇的产科肛门括约肌损伤的比较研究。

A comparative study of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vaginal deliveries of twins and singleton pregnancies.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St. Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom.

Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St. George's University of London, London.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Nov;37(8):2717-2723. doi: 10.1002/nau.23727. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1002/nau.23727
PMID:30187969
Abstract

AIMS

Increasing numbers of twin pregnancies necessitate investigation of the risk factors associated with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). The aims of this study were to establish the incidence of OASIS, and compare women delivering twins to those delivering singletons in risk of OASIS plus maternal, neonatal, and obstetric outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken and included women delivering in a tertiary London maternity unit between 1999 and 2015; 51 957 eligible women with singleton and 261 with twin pregnancies were identified. Women delivering twins were compared to those delivering singletons in the occurrence of maternal, neonatal, and obstetric outcomes using unadjusted relative risks. A secondary analysis was performed, and conditional logistic regression used to derive an adjusted relative risk of OASIS. Women delivering singletons were matched to those delivering twins for age, parity, ethnicity, gestation, and mode of delivery in a ratio of 2:1.

RESULTS

Compared to the singleton group, mothers delivering twins had significantly more instrumental deliveries (RR [95%CI] 1.92 [1.67-2.27]; P < 0.0001), smaller fetuses (2754.1 vs 3383.8 g; P < 0.001), and were older (32.9 vs 31.0 years; P < 0.0001). The twin group was not significantly different to the singleton group in risk of OASIS (RR 0.61 [0.27-1.33], P = 0.205). The conditional logistic regression demonstrated similar results for the risk of OASIS (adjusted RR = 0.58 [0.22-1.47]; P = 0.253).

CONCLUSIONS

Women delivering twins vaginally were not at a significantly higher risk of sustaining OASIS compared to those delivering singletons.

摘要

目的

随着双胞胎妊娠数量的增加,有必要研究与产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)相关的危险因素。本研究旨在确定 OASIS 的发生率,并比较分娩双胞胎和单胎的产妇、新生儿和产科结局的风险。

方法

进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1999 年至 2015 年期间在伦敦一家三级妇产医院分娩的女性;确定了 51957 名符合条件的单胎妊娠妇女和 261 名双胎妊娠妇女。采用未调整的相对风险比较分娩双胞胎的妇女和分娩单胎的妇女发生产妇、新生儿和产科结局的情况。进行了二次分析,并使用条件逻辑回归得出 OASIS 的调整相对风险。以 2:1 的比例按年龄、产次、种族、孕周和分娩方式将分娩单胎的妇女与分娩双胞胎的妇女进行匹配。

结果

与单胎组相比,分娩双胞胎的母亲剖宫产率显著更高(RR [95%CI] 1.92 [1.67-2.27];P<0.0001),胎儿较小(2754.1 与 3383.8g;P<0.001),年龄更大(32.9 与 31.0 岁;P<0.0001)。双胞胎组与单胎组的 OASIS 风险无显著差异(RR 0.61 [0.27-1.33],P=0.205)。条件逻辑回归也显示 OASIS 风险相似(调整 RR=0.58 [0.22-1.47];P=0.253)。

结论

与分娩单胎的产妇相比,阴道分娩的双胞胎产妇发生 OASIS 的风险没有显著增加。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vaginal deliveries of twins and singleton pregnancies.经阴道分娩的双胞胎与单胎妊娠产妇的产科肛门括约肌损伤的比较研究。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Nov;37(8):2717-2723. doi: 10.1002/nau.23727. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
2
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vaginal delivery of twins: associated risk factors and comparison with singletons.双胎阴道分娩时的产科肛门括约肌损伤:相关危险因素及与单胎的比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 May;24(5):769-74. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1923-8. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
3
Is the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries increased in vaginal twin deliveries?阴道分娩双胞胎时,产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险会增加吗?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(10):1700-3. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1059813. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
4
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in twin deliveries: a retrospective review.双胎分娩中产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):757-62. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2842-2. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
5
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: To prolong or to vacuum?产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素:是延长产程还是使用真空吸引?
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
6
Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery.不同阴道分娩方式的初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤率。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Dec;131(3):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.025. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
7
Incidence and risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter ruptures, OASIS, following the introduction of preventive interventions. A retrospective cohort study from a Norwegian hospital 2012-2017.产科肛门括约肌撕裂(OASIS)的发生率和危险因素,在预防干预措施引入后。2012-2017 年挪威一家医院的回顾性队列研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019 Dec;22:100460. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.100460. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
8
Long-term anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury-does grade of tear matter?分娩性肛门括约肌损伤后长期肛门失禁-撕裂程度重要吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):232.e1-232.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.569. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Anal Sphincter Injury Associated with Vaginal Twin Delivery.阴道分娩双胞胎相关的肛门括约肌损伤。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Sep;37(11):1134-1139. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692392. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
10
Risk of recurrence and subsequent delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injuries.产科肛门括约肌损伤后复发和再次分娩的风险。
BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03150.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.