Suppr超能文献

提高人群心血管健康水平的群组随机试验的长期结果:心血管健康意识计划(CHAP)。

Long term outcomes of cluster randomized trial to improve cardiovascular health at population level: The Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP).

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e0201802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201802. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

The Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) cardiovascular risk reduction program consisted of sessions run by local volunteers in local pharmacies during which cardiovascular risk was assessed, healthy lifestyle and preventive care was promoted, and the participants were oriented to local resources to support changes in modifiable risk factors. A clustered randomized trial implemented in September 2006 across 39 communities targeting community-dwelling individuals 65 years and older showed a significant reduction in hospitalization one year after its implementation (rate ratio of 91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 86%-97%]). This study explores the impact of CHAP in the first five years.

METHODS

Using health administrative data housed at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, we established a closed cohort consisting of all individuals eligible in these communities at the study onset whom we followed over time. We assessed hospitalizations and survival using a negative binomial model for count data and Cox regression to assess time to first event, accounting for the clustered design. The primary outcome was the rate of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations defined as congestive heart failure, stroke or acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Most estimates pointed to an advantage for the intervention arm, but only all-cause mortality reached statistical significance (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.955 [0.914-0.999]). The hospitalization cardiovascular-related hospitalization rate ratio was (0.958, 95% CI: 0.898-1.022) in favour of the intervention communities, translating to an estimated 408 averted hospitalizations over the five-year period. There was no evidence of the effect of time from start of intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistent direction of the outcomes in favour of the intervention arms suggests that CHAP likely had a meaningful impact on reducing cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality. Given the low cost of the intervention, further development of CHAP should be pursued.

摘要

研究问题

心血管健康意识计划(CHAP)心血管风险降低计划由当地志愿者在当地药店开展,评估心血管风险,促进健康生活方式和预防保健,并引导参与者了解当地资源,以支持可改变风险因素的改变。该计划于 2006 年 9 月在 39 个社区实施,针对 65 岁及以上的社区居民,实施一年后,住院率显著降低(发生率比为 91 [95%置信区间(CI):86%-97%])。本研究探讨了 CHAP 在最初五年的影响。

方法

利用安大略省伦敦市评估科学研究所保存的健康管理数据,我们建立了一个封闭队列,由研究开始时这些社区中所有符合条件的个体组成,我们对他们进行了随访。我们使用负二项回归模型评估计数数据中的住院情况和生存情况,使用 Cox 回归评估首次事件的时间,以考虑到聚类设计。主要结局是心血管相关住院率,定义为充血性心力衰竭、中风或急性心肌梗死。

结果

大多数估计结果表明干预组有优势,但只有全因死亡率达到统计学意义(风险比[95%CI] = 0.955 [0.914-0.999])。干预社区的心血管相关住院率比值为(0.958,95%CI:0.898-1.022),这意味着在五年期间估计可避免 408 例住院治疗。没有证据表明干预开始时间的影响。

结论

有利于干预组的结果一致表明,CHAP 可能对降低心血管相关发病率和死亡率产生了有意义的影响。鉴于干预的成本低,应进一步开发 CHAP。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/6126805/fd0df3a5a846/pone.0201802.g001.jpg

相似文献

3
Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP): a community cluster-randomised trial among elderly Canadians.
Prev Med. 2008 Jun;46(6):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
4
Economic appraisal of a community-wide cardiovascular health awareness program.
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.002.
6
7
9
NSAID use and association with cardiovascular outcomes in outpatients with stable atherothrombotic disease.
Am J Med. 2014 Jan;127(1):53-60.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.08.017. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Stroke Awareness and Activation Among High-Risk Populations: A Randomized Direct Mail Intervention in Diverse Healthcare Settings.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 May;18(5):e011425. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011425. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
3
[Not Available].
CMAJ. 2023 Dec 10;195(48):E1674-E1701. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230237-f.
4
Preventive care recommendations to promote health equity.
CMAJ. 2023 Sep 25;195(37):E1250-E1273. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230237.
6
Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Cardiology Specialists from the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Apr;116(4):774-781. doi: 10.36660/abc.20200125.
7
Heart Failure Awareness in the General Population: What Should We Do Next?
Korean Circ J. 2020 Jul;50(7):596-598. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0165.

本文引用的文献

2
The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.
Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S15628. eCollection 2015.
6
Educational group visits for the management of chronic health conditions: a systematic review.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Apr;95(1):3-29. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.021. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
8
Tight versus standard blood pressure control in patients with hypertension with and without cardiovascular disease.
Hypertension. 2014 Mar;63(3):475-82. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02089. Epub 2013 Dec 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验