• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于护士的干预对脆弱老年人药物治疗结局的影响。

Impact of a nurse-based intervention on medication outcomes in vulnerable older adults.

机构信息

University of California, 3333 California St, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA.

San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement St, Box 181G, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0905-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-018-0905-1
PMID:30189846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6127952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication-related problems are common in older adults with multiple chronic conditions. We evaluated the impact of a nurse-based primary care intervention, based on the Guided Care model of care, on patient-centered aspects of medication use.

METHODS

Controlled clinical trial of the Comprehensive Care for Multimorbid Adults Project (CC-MAP), conducted among 1218 participants in 7 intervention clinics and 6 control (usual care) clinics. Inclusion criteria included age 45-94, presence of ≥3 chronic conditions, and Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) score > 0.19. The co-primary outcomes were number of changes to the medication regimen between baseline and 9 month followup, and number of changes to symptom-focused medications, markers of attentiveness to medication-related issues.

RESULTS

Mean age in the intervention group was 72 years, 59% were women, and participants used a mean of 6.6 medications at baseline. The control group was slightly older (73 years) and used more medications (mean 7.1). Between baseline and 9 months, intervention subjects had more changes to their medication regimen than control subjects (mean 4.04 vs. 3.62 medication changes; adjusted difference 0.55, p = 0.001). Similarly, intervention subjects had more changes to their symptomatic medications (mean 1.38 vs. 1.26 changes, adjusted difference 0.20, p = 0.003). The total number of medications in use remained stable between baseline and follow-up in both groups (p > 0.18).

CONCLUSION

This nurse-based, primary care intervention resulted in substantially more changes to patients' medication regimens than usual care, without increasing the total number of medications used. This enhanced rate of change likely reflects greater attentiveness to the medication-related needs of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov , trial number NCT01811173 .

摘要

背景

患有多种慢性病的老年人普遍存在药物相关问题。我们评估了基于护理指导模式的护士主导的初级保健干预对药物使用的以患者为中心方面的影响。

方法

对 1218 名参与者进行了综合多病成年人护理项目(CC-MAP)的对照临床试验,这些参与者来自 7 个干预诊所和 6 个对照组(常规护理)诊所。纳入标准包括年龄 45-94 岁,存在≥3 种慢性病,调整后的临床分组(ACG)评分>0.19。主要结局是在基线和 9 个月随访期间药物治疗方案的改变数量,以及改变针对症状的药物、关注药物相关问题的标记物的数量。

结果

干预组的平均年龄为 72 岁,59%为女性,参与者在基线时使用了平均 6.6 种药物。对照组年龄稍大(73 岁),使用的药物更多(平均 7.1 种)。与基线相比,干预组在 9 个月内的药物治疗方案变化多于对照组(平均 4.04 次与 3.62 次药物变化;调整后的差异 0.55,p=0.001)。同样,干预组对症状性药物的改变更多(平均 1.38 次与 1.26 次变化,调整后的差异 0.20,p=0.003)。两组的用药总数在基线和随访期间均保持稳定(p>0.18)。

结论

与常规护理相比,这种基于护士的初级保健干预显著增加了患者的药物治疗方案的改变,而不增加使用的药物总数。这种更高的改变率可能反映了对患者药物相关需求的更高关注度。

试验注册

该试验在 https://clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,试验编号为 NCT01811173。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4460/6127952/c8e7b49b571a/12877_2018_905_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4460/6127952/c8e7b49b571a/12877_2018_905_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4460/6127952/c8e7b49b571a/12877_2018_905_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a nurse-based intervention on medication outcomes in vulnerable older adults.基于护士的干预对脆弱老年人药物治疗结局的影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0905-1.
2
Effectiveness of a complex intervention on Prioritising Multimedication in Multimorbidity (PRIMUM) in primary care: results of a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.一项综合干预措施对基层医疗中多重疾病患者多重用药优先排序(PRIMUM)的效果:一项实用整群随机对照试验的结果
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 24;8(2):e017740. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017740.
3
4
Supporting prescribing in older people with multimorbidity and significant polypharmacy in primary care (SPPiRE): a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol and pilot.在初级保健中支持多病共存和大量用药的老年人处方(SPPiRE):一项集群随机对照试验方案和试点研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 1;12(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0629-1.
5
Impact of a tailored program on the implementation of evidence-based recommendations for multimorbid patients with polypharmacy in primary care practices-results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项量身定制的项目对基层医疗实践中患有多种疾病且使用多种药物的患者实施循证推荐的影响——一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Implement Sci. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0535-y.
6
Narrative medicine-based intervention in primary care to reduce polypharmacy: results from the cluster-randomised controlled trial MultiCare AGENDA.基于叙事医学的初级保健干预以减少多重用药:整群随机对照试验MultiCare AGENDA的结果
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e017653. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017653.
7
Effectiveness of an intervention for improving drug prescription in primary care patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: study protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial (Multi-PAP project).一项改善患有多种疾病和使用多种药物的初级保健患者药物处方的干预措施的有效性:一项整群随机临床试验的研究方案(多药多症项目)
Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 27;12(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0584-x.
8
Optimising prescribing in older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in primary care (OPTICA): cluster randomised clinical trial.优化初级保健中老年多病共存和多种药物治疗患者的处方(OPTICA): 集群随机临床试验。
BMJ. 2023 May 24;381:e074054. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074054.
9
Baseline characteristics and comparability of older multimorbid patients with polypharmacy and general practitioners participating in a randomized controlled primary care trial.基线特征和患有多种疾病且药物治疗复杂的老年患者与参与随机对照初级保健试验的全科医生的可比性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01488-8.
10
Enhanced coordination of care to reduce medication risks in older home care clients in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.增强护理协调性以降低初级保健中老年居家护理客户的用药风险:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1353-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The PopGrouper as a tool for morbidity adjustment in regional comparisons of health care: an analytical framework.PopGrouper作为区域医疗保健比较中发病率调整的工具:一个分析框架。
Res Health Serv Reg. 2025 Aug 6;4(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s43999-025-00068-y.
2
Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)在研究中的应用:一项国际范围综述
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03958-3.
3
A mixed-methods systematic review of nurse-led interventions for people with multimorbidity.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics and Trends in Hypnotics Consumption in the Largest Health Care System in Israel.以色列最大医疗保健系统中催眠药物消费的特征与趋势
Sleep Disord. 2016;2016:8032528. doi: 10.1155/2016/8032528. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
2
Changes in medication regimen complexity and the risk for 90-day hospital readmission and/or emergency department visits in U.S. Veterans with heart failure.美国心力衰竭退伍军人药物治疗方案复杂性的变化以及90天内再次入院和/或急诊就诊的风险
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 Sep-Oct;12(5):713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
3
Rates of Deintensification of Blood Pressure and Glycemic Medication Treatment Based on Levels of Control and Life Expectancy in Older Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.
多病症患者的护士主导干预措施的混合方法系统评价
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Dec;78(12):3930-3951. doi: 10.1111/jan.15427. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
4
Determine the impact of a structured pharmacist-led medication review - a controlled intervention study to optimise medication safety for residents in long-term care facilities.确定以药剂师为主导的结构化药物审查的影响 - 一项对照干预研究,旨在优化长期护理机构居民的药物安全。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03025-3.
5
Indicators of Good Nursing Practices for Vulnerable Groups in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review.初级卫生保健中弱势群体良好护理实践的指标:范围综述。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Oct 29;29:e3488. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5203.3488. eCollection 2021.
6
Deprescribing for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.针对社区居住老年人的减药治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):3323-3332. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06089-2. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
7
Healthcare providers' experiences in supporting community-living older adults to manage multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study.医疗保健提供者在支持社区居住的老年慢性病患者管理方面的经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Nov 19;19(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1345-2.
基于糖尿病老年患者的控制水平和预期寿命的血压和血糖药物治疗的弱化率
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1942-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5110.
4
American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.美国老年医学会2015年更新的《老年人潜在不适当用药的Beers标准》
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Nov;63(11):2227-46. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13702. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
5
Patient-centered priorities for improving medication management and adherence.以患者为中心改善药物管理和依从性的优先事项。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jan;98(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
6
Patient-centered interventions to improve medication management and adherence: a qualitative review of research findings.以患者为中心的干预措施以改善药物管理和依从性:研究结果的定性综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Dec;97(3):310-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
7
High-risk case identification for use in comprehensive complex care management.用于综合复杂护理管理的高风险病例识别。
Popul Health Manag. 2015 Feb;18(1):15-22. doi: 10.1089/pop.2014.0011. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
8
The patient centered medical home. A systematic review.患者为中心的医疗之家。系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):169-78. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00579.
9
Cumulative changes in the use of long-term medications: a measure of prescribing complexity.长期药物使用的累积变化:一种衡量处方复杂性的指标。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Sep 9;173(16):1546-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7060.
10
Effects of Guided Care on providers' satisfaction with care: a three-year matched-pair cluster-randomized trial.基于指南的护理对医护人员护理满意度的影响:一项为期三年的配对整群随机试验。
Popul Health Manag. 2013 Oct;16(5):317-25. doi: 10.1089/pop.2012.0091. Epub 2013 Apr 6.