Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Stoystr. 3, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Division of Psychological Interventions and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, Binzmühlestrasse 14, Box 04, CH-8050, Zürich, Switzerland.
Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 8;7(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0802-x.
While it is well known that psychotherapy is efficacious in the treatment of mental disorders, much less is known about the adverse effects of psychotherapeutic interventions. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the definition, frequency, nature, and severity of adverse effects occurring parallel to or following psychotherapeutic treatment and to compare it against control groups.
All registered randomised controlled trials published since 2004 (publication year of harm-reporting extension of the CONSORT statement) with adult patients fulfilling clinical criteria of defined mental disorders, which compare individual or group psychotherapy against a control group, will be included. First, a search through international trial registers as well as a search in literature databases (e.g. MEDLINE) and in relevant journals (e.g. Trials) for study protocols will be conducted to identify eligible trials. In a second step, we will search for respective publications of the results of the eligible studies. Publications will be retrieved and screened for eligibility. Two previously trained, independent raters will extract the data in duplicate. Reporting of adverse effects will be descriptively analysed regarding frequency, heterogeneity, and longitudinal course. We will further compare the adverse effects of psychotherapeutic interventions against various control groups. For each categorical outcome, we will calculate relative risks (RR) together with 95% confidence intervals. For continuous outcomes, standardised mean differences (Hedges' g) with a 95% confidence interval will be computed. Between-study heterogeneity will be tested with the Q statistic and quantified using I.
Preselecting studies with regard to randomised controlled trials might induce bias due to dropout before the beginning of treatment or end of treatment. However, we will thoroughly assess the negative effects of randomisation, e.g. reasons for non-randomisation, if reported. Even if delayed adverse effects might be overlooked in randomised controlled trials, these are the only sources of causal evidence.
PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews 2017: CRD42017055507 (17 January 2017).
虽然众所周知心理疗法在治疗精神障碍方面是有效的,但对于心理治疗干预的不良影响却知之甚少。本系统评价的目的是检查与心理治疗治疗同时或之后发生的不良影响的定义、频率、性质和严重程度,并将其与对照组进行比较。
所有自 2004 年以来(CONSORT 声明的不良事件报告扩展发布年份)发表的符合临床定义的精神障碍的成年患者的注册随机对照试验,将个体或团体心理治疗与对照组进行比较,将被纳入研究。首先,通过国际试验登记处以及文献数据库(如 MEDLINE)和相关期刊(如 Trials)搜索研究方案,以确定符合条件的试验。其次,我们将搜索符合条件研究的相应出版物。检索和筛选出版物以确定其是否符合入选标准。两名经过培训的、独立的评估者将重复提取数据。将对不良事件的报告进行描述性分析,包括频率、异质性和纵向过程。我们还将比较心理治疗干预与各种对照组的不良影响。对于每种分类结果,我们将计算相对风险(RR)及其 95%置信区间。对于连续结果,将计算标准化均数差异(Hedges'g)及其 95%置信区间。将使用 Q 统计量和 I 来检验异质性。
由于治疗开始前或治疗结束时的脱落,预先选择随机对照试验可能会导致偏倚。但是,如果有报告,我们将彻底评估随机化的负面影响,例如非随机化的原因。即使在随机对照试验中可能会忽略延迟的不良影响,但这些是唯一的因果证据来源。
PROSPERO 国际前瞻性系统评价注册中心 2017:CRD42017055507(2017 年 1 月 17 日)。