• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床问题与心理变化:人工智能如何支持心理健康从业者?

Clinical Questions and Psychological Change: How Can Artificial Intelligence Support Mental Health Practitioners?

作者信息

Orrù Luisa, Cuccarini Marco, Moro Christian, Turchi Gian Piero

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1225. doi: 10.3390/bs14121225.

DOI:10.3390/bs14121225
PMID:39767368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11673989/
Abstract

Despite their diverse assumptions, clinical psychology approaches share the goal of mental health promotion. The literature highlights their usefulness, but also some issues related to their effectiveness, such as their difficulties in monitoring psychological change. The elective strategy for activating and managing psychological change is the clinical question. But how do different types of questions foster psychological change? This work tries to answer this issue by studying therapist-patient interactions with a ML model for text analysis. The goal was to investigate how psychological change occurs thanks to different types of questions, and to see if the ML model recognized this difference in analyzing patients' answers to therapists' clinical questions. The experimental dataset of 14,567 texts was divided based on two different question purposes, splitting answers in two categories: those elicited by questions asking patients to start describing their clinical situation, or those from asking them to detail how they evaluate their situation and mental health condition. The hypothesis that these categories are distinguishable by the model was confirmed by the results, which corroborate the different valences of the questions. These results foreshadow the possibility to train ML and AI models to suggest clinical questions to therapists based on patients' answers, allowing the increase of clinicians' knowledge, techniques, and skills.

摘要

尽管临床心理学方法有着不同的假设,但它们都有促进心理健康的共同目标。文献强调了它们的有用性,但也指出了一些与有效性相关的问题,比如在监测心理变化方面存在困难。激活和管理心理变化的选择性策略是一个临床问题。但是不同类型的问题是如何促进心理变化的呢?这项工作试图通过使用文本分析的机器学习模型研究治疗师与患者的互动来回答这个问题。目标是研究由于不同类型的问题心理变化是如何发生的,并查看机器学习模型在分析患者对治疗师临床问题的回答时是否能识别这种差异。14567篇文本的实验数据集根据两种不同的问题目的进行了划分,将回答分为两类:一类是由要求患者开始描述其临床情况的问题引发的回答,另一类是由要求他们详细说明如何评估自己的情况和心理健康状况的问题引发的回答。模型能够区分这些类别的假设得到了结果的证实,这些结果证实了问题的不同效价。这些结果预示了训练机器学习和人工智能模型根据患者的回答为治疗师建议临床问题的可能性,从而增加临床医生的知识、技术和技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e5/11673989/1576009442ba/behavsci-14-01225-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e5/11673989/a0b6baddc3a8/behavsci-14-01225-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e5/11673989/5b53f214adb2/behavsci-14-01225-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e5/11673989/1576009442ba/behavsci-14-01225-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e5/11673989/a0b6baddc3a8/behavsci-14-01225-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e5/11673989/5b53f214adb2/behavsci-14-01225-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e5/11673989/1576009442ba/behavsci-14-01225-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Questions and Psychological Change: How Can Artificial Intelligence Support Mental Health Practitioners?临床问题与心理变化:人工智能如何支持心理健康从业者?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1225. doi: 10.3390/bs14121225.
2
Organizational factors associated with community therapists' self-efficacy in EBP delivery: The interplay between sustainment leadership, sustainment climate, and psychological safety.与社区治疗师在循证实践实施中的自我效能相关的组织因素:维持领导、维持氛围和心理安全之间的相互作用。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Jul 4;3:26334895221110263. doi: 10.1177/26334895221110263. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Tangentiality as non-conformity: Responses of participants with right hemisphere damage to questions in clinical interactions.作为不相符性的牵连性:右半球损伤参与者在临床互动中对问题的反应
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Mar-Apr;60(2):e70000. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70000.
5
Assessing the performance of Bing Chat artificial intelligence: Dental exams, clinical guidelines, and patients' frequent questions.评估 Bing Chat 人工智能的性能:牙科检查、临床指南和患者常见问题。
J Dent. 2024 May;144:104927. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104927. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
6
Investigating Protective and Risk Factors and Predictive Insights for Aboriginal Perinatal Mental Health: Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach.探究原住民围产期心理健康的保护因素、风险因素及预测性见解:可解释人工智能方法
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e68030. doi: 10.2196/68030.
7
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
8
Comparing answers of artificial intelligence systems and clinical toxicologists to questions about poisoning: Can their answers be distinguished?比较人工智能系统和临床毒理学家对中毒问题的回答:能否区分他们的答案?
Emergencias. 2024 Oct;36(5):351-358. doi: 10.55633/s3me/082.2024.
9
Can Artificial Intelligence Pass the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Examination? Orthopaedic Residents Versus ChatGPT.人工智能能通过美国骨科医师学会考试吗?骨科住院医师与ChatGPT的对比。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Aug 1;481(8):1623-1630. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002704. Epub 2023 May 23.
10
Large Language Models Versus Expert Clinicians in Crisis Prediction Among Telemental Health Patients: Comparative Study.大语言模型与专家临床医生在远程心理健康患者危机预测中的比较研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Aug 2;11:e58129. doi: 10.2196/58129.

本文引用的文献

1
Confirmatory information seeking is robust in psychologists' diagnostic reasoning.在心理学家的诊断推理中,寻求确证信息的行为很常见。
Law Hum Behav. 2024 Oct-Dec;48(5-6):503-518. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000574. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Worry about the Future in the Climate Change Emergency: A Mediation Analysis of the Role of Eco-Anxiety and Emotion Regulation.气候变化紧急状态下对未来的担忧:生态焦虑和情绪调节作用的中介分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;14(3):255. doi: 10.3390/bs14030255.
3
The Invisible Discrimination: Biases in the Clinical Approach Regarding Migrants: A Study to Help Ethnopsychology Services and Clinicians.
无形的歧视:临床诊疗中对移民的偏见:一项助力民族心理学服务与临床医生的研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;14(3):155. doi: 10.3390/bs14030155.
4
Revisiting the theoretical and methodological foundations of depression measurement.重新审视抑郁症测量的理论和方法基础。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022 Jun;1(6):358-368. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00050-2. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
A contribution towards health.对健康的一份贡献。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;28(5):717-720. doi: 10.1111/jep.13732. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Forward to a methodological proposal to support cancer patients: the dialogics' contribution for the precision care.迈向支持癌症患者的方法建议:对话学对精准医疗的贡献。
Med Oncol. 2022 Feb 23;39(5):75. doi: 10.1007/s12032-021-01644-1.
7
The Interactive Management of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus: The Social Cohesion Index, a Methodological-Operational Proposal.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒的互动管理:社会凝聚力指数,一项方法学-操作建议
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 2;12:559842. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.559842. eCollection 2021.
8
How to Intervene in the Health Management of the Oncological Patient and of Their Caregiver? A Narrative Review in the Psycho-Oncology Field.如何干预肿瘤患者及其照顾者的健康管理?心理肿瘤学领域的叙述性综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Jul 9;11(7):99. doi: 10.3390/bs11070099.
9
Automated evaluation of psychotherapy skills using speech and language technologies.使用语音和语言技术自动评估心理治疗技能。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):690-711. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01623-4. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
10
Using Prosodic and Lexical Information for Learning Utterance-level Behaviors in Psychotherapy.利用韵律和词汇信息学习心理治疗中的话语层面行为。
Interspeech. 2018 Sep;2018:3413-3417. doi: 10.21437/interspeech.2018-2551.